SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Turkish Adaptation of the 3 x 2 Goal Orientation Scale

3 x 2 Hedef Yönelimi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

Cansel KADIOĞLU AKBULUT
Esen UZUNTİRYAKİ-KONDAKÇI
Pages
839–866
Publication Date
2019-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the main study, it was found that the scale consisted of 18 items and six sub-dimensions (task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, other-avoidance) consistent with the original study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to translate the Goal Orientation Scale revised by Elliot, Murayama and Pekrun (2011) based on the 3 x 2 model into Turkish and to conduct the validity and reliability analyses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 198 pre-service teachers participated in the pilot study while 311 pre-service teachers attended the main study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the main study, it was found that the scale consisted of 18 items and six sub-dimensions (task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, other-avoidance) consistent with the original study.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Hedef yönelimi · Başarı Hedefleri Kuramı · 3 x 2 Modeli

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate the Goal Orientation Scale revised by Elliot, Murayama and Pekrun (2011) based on the 3 x 2 model into Turkish and to conduct the validity and reliability analyses. The adaptation of the scale to Turkish was done with the pre-service teachers taking “Educational Psychology” course at university level. A total of 198 pre-service teachers participated in the pilot study while 311 pre-service teachers attended the main study. As a result of pilot study, some revisions were made in the sentence structure of the items considering the expert opinions. As a result of the main study, it was found that the scale consisted of 18 items and six sub-dimensions (task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, other-avoidance) consistent with the original study. In addition, Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were satisfactory for each sub-dimension. As a result of this study, the scores obtained by using 3 x 2 Goal Orientation Scale were found to be valid and reliable. Accordingly, separating the mastery goals in the 2 x 2 model as "task" and "self" goals in the 3 x 2 model was found to be appropriate for Turkish sample.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı Elliot, Murayama ve Pekrun (2011) tarafından 3 x 2 modeline göre güncellenen Hedef Yönelimi Ölçeği’ni Türkçe’ye çevirmek, geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerini yapmaktır. Ölçeğin Türkçe uyarlaması üniversite düzeyinde “Eğitim Psikolojisi” dersini almakta olan öğretmen adayları ile yapılmıştır. Araştırma pilot ve asıl çalışma olmak üzere iki kısımdan oluşmaktadır. Pilot çalışmaya 198 öğretmen adayı katılırken asıl çalışmaya 311 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Pilot çalışma sonucunda, uzman görüşleri dikkate alınarak maddelerin cümle yapılarında bazı değişiklikler yapılmıştır. Asıl çalışma sonucunda ise, ölçeğin, aslına uygun olarak 18 maddeden ve altı alt boyuttan (görev-yaklaşma, görev-kaçınma, öz-yaklaşma, öz-kaçınma, diğer-yaklaşma, diğer-kaçınma) oluştuğu bulunmuştur. Her boyut için Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayısı yeterli düzeyde çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonucunda, Türkçe’ye uyarlanan 3 x 2 Hedef Yönelimi Ölçeği kullanılarak elde edilen puanların geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu doğrultuda 2 x 2 modelindeki “öğrenmeye yönelik” hedeflerin “görev” ve “öz” şeklinde ayrıldığı 3 x 2 modelinin Türkiye örneklemi için uygun olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBULUT, C. K., UZUNTİRYAKİ-KONDAKÇI, E. (2019). Turkish Adaptation of the 3 x 2 Goal Orientation Scale. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 839–866. https://ajindex.com/articles/55320

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
  2. Bartels, J. M. & Magun-Jackson, S. (2009). Approach–avoidance motivation and metacognitive self-regulation: The role of need for achievement and fear of failure. Learning and Individual Differences,19(4), 459–463.
  3. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. (pp. 136-162).
  4. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology; 35(1), 75-87.
  5. Conroy, D. E. ve Elliot, A. J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17(3) 271-285.
  6. David, A. P. (2014). Analysis of the separation of task-based and self-based achievement goals in a Philippine sample. Psychological Studies, 59(4), 365-373.
  7. Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social –cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
  8. Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Achievement Goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
  9. Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
  10. Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70, 968-980.
  11. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
  12. Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K., ve Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632-648.
  13. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J.M., Carter, S.M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330.
  14. Hulleman, C. S., & Rhee Bonney, C. (2006, April; co-organizers). Defining and distinguishing mastery-avoidance goals: Definitions, domains, and assessment. Symposium organized for the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Participants: S. Karabenick (chair), A. Elliot