Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

The Turkish adaptation of scale to measure patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services: A validity and reliability study

Pages
187–193
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Item-total correlations ranged from 0.56 to 0.83 for the entire group, which was above expected values.CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the scale to assess patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services, which comprised 4 sub-dimensions and 36 items, was found to be valid and reliable for use with the Turkish population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of a version of the tool developed in Sri Lanka in 2011 to assess patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services created for use with Turkish patients.METHODS: This methodological study was conducted between November 2013 and November 2014 after obtaining ethical approval and organizational permission.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data was collected during discharge from 180 adult patients who were hospitalized for at least 3 days at a medical school hospital located in Istanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Item-total correlations ranged from 0.56 to 0.83 for the entire group, which was above expected values.CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the scale to assess patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services, which comprised 4 sub-dimensions and 36 items, was found to be valid and reliable for use with the Turkish population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of a version of the tool developed in Sri Lanka in 2011 to assess patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services created for use with Turkish patients.METHODS: This methodological study was conducted between November 2013 and November 2014 after obtaining ethical approval and organizational permission. Data was collected during discharge from 180 adult patients who were hospitalized for at least 3 days at a medical school hospital located in Istanbul. After language validation, validity and reliability analyses of the scale were conducted. Content validity, content validity index (CVI), construct validity, and exploratory factor analysis were assessed and examined, and reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlations.RESULTS: Mean CVI was found to be 0.95, which is above expected value. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 factors with eigenvalues above 1, which explained 82.4% of total variance in the Turkish version of the tool to measure patient perceptions of nursing care and other hospital services. Factor loading for each item was >=.40. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of sub-dimensions and total scale were found to be 0.84-0.98 and 0.98, respectively. Item-total correlations ranged from 0.56 to 0.83 for the entire group, which was above expected values.CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the scale to assess patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services, which comprised 4 sub-dimensions and 36 items, was found to be valid and reliable for use with the Turkish population.

🔖

Cite This Article

OREN, B., YİLDİZ, N., ZENGİN, N. (2022). The Turkish adaptation of scale to measure patient perceptions of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services: A validity and reliability study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/551642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Mucuk İ. Pazarlama ilkeleri. 6. baskı. İstanbul: DER Yayınları; 1994.
  2. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. Reassesment of expec- tations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for further research. J Mark January 1994;56:111- 24. Asubonteng P, McCleary KJ, Swan JE. SERVQUAL Revisited: a critical review of service quality. JSM 1996;10:62-81.
  3. Devebakan N, Aksaraylı M. Sağlık işletmelerinde algılanan hizmet kalitesinin ölçümünde SERVQUAL skorlarının kullanımı ve Özel Altınordu Hastanesi Uygulaması. Dokuz Ey- lül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2003;5:38-54. Yılmaz M. Sağlık bakım kalitesinin bir ölçütü: Hasta memnuni- yeti. CNJ 2001;5:69-74.
  4. Senarath U, Nalika SG. Development of an ınstrument to mea- sure patient perception of the quality of nursing care and related hospital services at the national hospital of Sri Lanka. Asian Nurs Res June 2011;5:71-80.
  5. Bacon CT, Mark B. Organizational effects on patient satisfaction in hospital medical-surgical units. J Nurs Adm 2009;39:220-7.
  6. Yildiz Z, Erdoğmus S. Measuring patient satisfaction of the quality of health care: a study of hospitals in Turkey. J Med Syst 2004;28:581-9.
  7. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 1988;49:41-9.
  8. Gonzalez-Valentin A, Padin-Lopez S, de Ramon- Garrido E. Patient satisfaction with nursing care in a regional university hospital in southern Spain. J Nurs Care Qual 2005;20:63-72.
  9. Dozier AM, Kitzman HJ, Ingersoll GL, Holmberg S, Schul- tz AW. Development of an instrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care. Res Nurs Health 2001;24:506-17.
  10. Sandin Bojo AKF, Hall-Lord ML, Axelsson O, Uden G, Wilde Larsson B. Midwifery care: development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization's clas- sification of care in normal birth. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:75-83.
  11. Lynn M, McMillen B, Sidani S. Understanding and measuring patients' assessment of the quality of nursing care. Nursing Re- search 2007;56:159-66. Uzun O. Patient satisfaction with nursing care at a university hospital in Turkey. J Nurs Care Qual 2001;16:24-33. Erkuş A. Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme I: Temel ka- vramlar ve işlemler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2012.
  12. Aksayan S, Gözüm S. Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için reh- ber I: Ölçek uyarlama araştırmaları ve dil uyarlaması. HEMAR- G 2002;4:9-14. Karasar N. Ölçme ve araçlarında aranan nitelikler. Bilimsel araşt