SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5

Disabled woman attitude scale: Reliability and validity study

Besey Oren
Melike Punduk Yilmaz
Pages
454–463
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Kaiser-Meyer Olkin coefficient of 0.793, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop a scale to determine the attitude of nursing and midwifery university students towards disabled women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was realized with a total of 167 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Kaiser-Meyer Olkin coefficient of 0.793, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop a scale to determine the attitude of nursing and midwifery university students towards disabled women. METHODS: In the development of the scale; expert opinion, content validity, item reliability, and construct validity stages were included in the study. It was realized with a total of 167 students. To evaluate the suitability of the data for factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Sample Fit Test and Bartlett’s test have been applied. To evaluate validity and reliability; test-retest, factor analysis, and internal consistency analysis have been applied. Permission from the institutions and ethics committee permission was obtained. RESULTS: The number of the items in the scale decreased from 64 to 31 in accordance with expert opinion. Internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.817 and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.992. The exploratory factor analysis revealed an four-factor structure, accounting for 59.81% of the variance. Kaiser-Meyer Olkin coefficient of 0.793, p

🔖

Cite This Article

Oren, B., Yilmaz, M. P. (2022). Disabled woman attitude scale: Reliability and validity study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5, 454–463. https://ajindex.com/articles/551264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Geneva; 2011
  2. World Healt Organization. Disability and health, 2016. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disabilityand- health. Accessed Jan 26, 2018
  3. Şen M. Employment policies for disabled people in Turkey: problems and suggestions. Journal of Social Security 2018;8:129–52
  4. Kahraman Güloğlu F. A new organization in the field of disability rights in turkey women with disabilities’ movement. The Journal of International Social Research 2015;8:477–89
  5. Löve L, Traustadottir R, Rice JG. Trading autonomy for services: Perceptions of users and providers of services for disabled people in Iceland. ALTER 2018;12:193–207
  6. Karabulut A. The role of patriarchal ideology in the gender framework of orthopedic disabled women and men. [Master’s Thesis]. Ankara Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences Department of Social Work; 2017
  7. Buz, S, Karabulut A. Orthopedically handicapped women: a study in the framework of gender. Iğdır University Journal of Social Sciences 2015;:25–45
  8. Bulut S, Karaman H. Sexual, physical and emotional abuse of individuals with disabilities. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education 2018;19:277–301
  9. Demir A, Yeşiltuna D. Being a disabled woman in the context of family and power relationship. The Journal of International Social Research 2017;10:534–44
  10. Tezbaşaran AA. A comparison of conventional item analysis techniques to construct Likert type scales. Turkish Journal of Psychology 2004;19:77–87
  11. Süngü B. Development and validation of the preservice physical education and sport teacher’s attitudes toward children with intellectual disabilities. [Master Thesis]. Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Health Sciences; 2012
  12. İlhan EL, Esentürk OK. An effort to develop an awareness scale regarding effects of sport on persons with ıntellectual disabilities. CBU Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences 2014;9:19-36
  13. Yelpaze İ, Türküm AS. Adaptation and validation of Turkey version of multidimensional attitudes toward persons with disbilities. International Journal of Society Researches 2018;8167–87
  14. Tavşancıl E. Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. 5th ed. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing; 2014
  15. Büyüköztürk Ş. Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Publishing; 2010