Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

A single center’s experience of the extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas

Pages
35–40
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this research was to explore the overall survival (OS) and therapeutic effects of platinum-etoposide combination therapy in EP-NEC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) is a rare tumor type, and a standard therapy for EP-NEC has not yet been established.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted based on the medical records from January 2010 to March 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this research was to explore the overall survival (OS) and therapeutic effects of platinum-etoposide combination therapy in EP-NEC.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) is a rare tumor type, and a standard therapy for EP-NEC has not yet been established. The purpose of this research was to explore the overall survival (OS) and therapeutic effects of platinum-etoposide combination therapy in EP-NEC. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted based on the medical records from January 2010 to March 2020. Eligible patients had been pathologically diagnosed with EP-NEC. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the study. About 72.3% (n=34) of the patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease at the first diagnosis. The most common primary tumor site was the stomach. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the patient group, who received the combination of platinum/etoposide, was 5.83 months (95% CI 4.46– 7.20), whereas the median OS of the patients, who were found to have metastatic disease at the first diagnosis, was 13.6 months (95% CI 9.01–18.18). There was no difference in PFS and OS between patients with and without liver metastasis. CONCLUSION: The outcome of advanced EP-NECs with platinum/etoposide chemotherapy remains poor. Obviously, there is a need for new, more effective treatment options.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMANCI, N. Ş., ÇELİK, E., TURNA, Z. H., DEĞERLİ, E., DERİN, S., BEDİR, Ş., ORUÇ, K., ÖZTAŞ, N. Ş., ALKAN, G., ŞENYİĞİT, A. (2022). A single center’s experience of the extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 35–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/551217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas 2010;39:707–12
  2. Taal BG, Visser O. Epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2004;80 Suppl 1:3–7
  3. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Available at: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/ abstract/20113051318. Accessed Dec 24, 2021
  4. Dasari A, Mehta K, Byers LA, Sorbye H, Yao JC. Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: A SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases. Cancer 2018;124:807–15
  5. Garcia-Carbonero R, Sorbye H, Baudin E, Raymond E, Wiedenmann B, Niederle B, et al; Vienna Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology 2016;103:186–94
  6. Moertel CG, Kvols LK, O’Connell MJ, Rubin J. Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Evidence of major therapeutic activity in the anaplastic variants of these neoplasms. Cancer 1991;68:227–32
  7. Terashima T, Morizane C, Hiraoka N, Tsuda H, Tamura T, Shimada Y, et al. Comparison of chemotherapeutic treatment outcomes of advanced extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas and advanced small-cell lung carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology 2012;96:324–32
  8. Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, Vestermark LW, Holt N, Osterlund P, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol 2013;24:152–60
  9. Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, Rinke A, Borbath I, Crespo G, et al; other Knowledge Network members. Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer 2015;22:657–64
  10. Yamaguchi T, Machida N, Morizane C, Kasuga A, Takahashi H, Sudo K, et al. Multicenter retrospective analysis of systemic chemotherapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system. Cancer Sci 2014;105:1176–81
  11. Frizziero M, Spada F, Lamarca A, Kordatou Z, Barriuso J, Nuttall C, et al. Carboplatin in combination with oral or intravenous etoposide for extra-pulmonary, poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinol