Journals / İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Single-or Double-Layer Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section on Uterine Scar Formation

Sezaryende Tek veya Çift Kat Kapatma Tekniklerinin Uterin Skar Oluşumuna Etkisi

Pages
25–31
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In Group 1, concurrent measurements were 5.4±1.5 mm and 8.1±1.5 mm, respectively (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to compare scar thickness on the Cesarean section incision site as measured with TVUSG at postpartum 48th hours and 6th months after applications of single-, and double layer suture techniques and intended to enlighten the complications such as uterine rupture, cesarean scar pregnancy, placental abnormalities, infertility and postmenstrual drip style bleeding in further pregnancies.Material and Methods: Our patients are divided into 2 groups as those receiving single-layer (Group 1; n=27) and doublelayer sutures (Group 2; n=46).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The characteristics of the patients were investigated in four main groups as (sociodemographic characteristics, antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum 48 hours-6 months).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In Group 1, concurrent measurements were 5.4±1.5 mm and 8.1±1.5 mm, respectively (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare scar thickness on the Cesarean section incision site as measured with TVUSG at postpartum 48th hours and 6th months after applications of single-, and double layer suture techniques and intended to enlighten the complications such as uterine rupture, cesarean scar pregnancy, placental abnormalities, infertility and postmenstrual drip style bleeding in further pregnancies.Material and Methods: Our patients are divided into 2 groups as those receiving single-layer (Group 1; n=27) and doublelayer sutures (Group 2; n=46). The characteristics of the patients were investigated in four main groups as (sociodemographic characteristics, antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum 48 hours-6 months). Findings of transvaginal ultrasound performed at 48 hours, and 6 months after CS were taken into consideration US parametres as thickness, and lenght of the scar, myometrial thickness, echogenicity, vascularization, and continuity of the scar, length of the cervix, size of the uyterus, presence of a niche, right, and left uterine artery PI values were taken into account on 2. postprocedural day. Besides uses of iron supplementation, steroid, NSAID, and multivitamin during postpartum period were also questioned.Results: In both group as age, gravidity, parity, abortion, education, BMI, mean duration of sun exposure were similar. In patients various variables like smoking, anemia, iron and multivitamin supplementations, vitamin D levels and the presence of pregnancy-existing illnesses were not found to effect the 6-month scar thickness (p>0.05). In Group 2, mean thickness of the scar was measured as 7.5±2.2 mm at 48th hours, and 6.9±2.0 mm at 6th months. In Group 1, concurrent measurements were 5.4±1.5 mm and 8.1±1.5 mm, respectively (p

Özet

Amaç: Sezaryen kesi yerine uygulanan tek ve çift katmanlı sütür teknikleri sonrası postpartum 48. saat ve 6. ayda skar kalınlıklarının karşılaştırılması ve sonraki gebeliklerde uterus rüptürü, skar yeri gebeliği, plasenta anomalileri, infertilite, postmenstrual damlama tarzı kanama gibi oluşacak komplikasyonlara ışık tutması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastalarımız Grup 1 (n=27) tek katmanlı ve Grup 2 (n=46) çift katmanlı sütür atılanlar olarak 2 gruba ayrılmıştır. Hastaların özellikleri 4 ana grupta (sosyodemografik, antepartum, intrapartum ve postpartum 48 saat-6. ay olarak) incelenmiştir. Postpartum dönemde 48. saat ve 6. ayda yapılan transvajinal ultrason bulguları dikkate alınmıştır. İkinci günde USG'de dikkat edilen parametreler; skar kalınlığı ve skar boyu, myometrial kalınlık, skar ekojenitesi, vaskülarizasyonu ve devamlılığıdır. Yüz sekseninci günde ise skar kalınlığı, skar boyu, myometrial kalınlık, skar ekojenitesi, vaskülarizasyonu, devamlılığı, servikal uzunluk, uterus boyutu, niş varlığı, sağ ve sol uterin arter PI değerleridir. Ayrıca postpartum dönemde demir takviyesinin olup olmadığı, steroid ve NSAİİ ve multivitamin kullanımı sorgulanmıştır. Bulgular: Her iki gruptaki yaş, gravida, parite, abortus, eğitim durumu, BMI, güneşe maruziyet süresi benzer bulunmuştur. Sigara kullanımı, anemi varlığı, demir ve multivitamin takviyesinin, D vitamini düzeyi, gebelikte var olan hastalıklar gibi çeşitli değişkenlerin 6. ay skar kalınlığına etkisi olmadığı gözlenmiştir (p>0,05) (Şekil 2). Grup 2'de skar kalınlığını 48. saatte 7,5±2,2 olarak, 6. ayda ise 6,9±2,0 olarak ölçtük. Grup 1'de eşzamanlarda sırasıyla 5,4±1,5 ve 8,1±1,5 olarak ölçtük (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇORAKÇI, A., AVCI, M. E., ÇAKIROĞLU, A. Y., BARAN, F. Ş. (2022). The Effect of Single-or Double-Layer Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section on Uterine Scar Formation. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 25–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/551039

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62:1- 20
  2. Küçükbaş GN, Moraloğlu Ö, Özel Ş, Erkaya S, Taşcı Y, Bedir Fındık R. The cesarean rates and indications between 2010 and 2014 in the Obstetrics Department of Dr. Zekai Tahir Burak Maternal Health Training and Research Hospital. Perinatal J. 2016;24:61-5.
  3. Flamm BL. Cesarean section: a worldwide epidemic? Birth. 2000;27:139-40.
  4. Scioscia M, Vimercati A, Cito L, Chironna E, Scattarella D, Selvaggi LE. Social determinants of the increasing caesarean section rate in Italy. Minerva Ginecol. 2008;60:115-20
  5. Seiler CM, Deckert A, Diener MK, Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Weigand MA, et al. Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomised, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCT 60734227). Ann Surg. 2009;249:913-20.
  6. Dikmen S, Aslan Çetin B, Gedikbaşı A, Kıyak H, Köroğlu N. The outcomes of extending uterine incision transversely or cephalocaudally in patients with previous cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled study. Perinatal Journal. 2017;25:1-5.
  7. Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernández C, Mackenna A, Zegers F, Fernández E. Surgical treatment and followup of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:25-8.
  8. Van Horenbeeck A, Temmerman M, Dhont M. Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1137-9.
  9. Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1108-11.
  10. Ferrari AG, Frigerio LG, Candotti G, Buscaglia M, Petrone M, Taglioretti A, Calori G. Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;72: 135-43.
  11. Armstrong V, Hansen WF, Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH. Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:61-5
  12. Charoenkwan K. Double-layer continuous parallel uterine closure for low tranverse cesarean incisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;94:137-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.