Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2008 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Sezeryan skar gebeliğinde erken tedaviyi reddeden hastada 23.gebelik haftasında hayat kurtarıcı histerektomi vakası: Olgu sunumu

Patient’s refusal of early treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy resulting in life - saving hysterectomy at 23 weeks gestation: Report of a case

Pages
201–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We herein present a case of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy complicated with uterine rupture at 23 weeks’ gestation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare life-threatening form of ectopic pregnancy embedded in the myometrium of a previous cesarean scar.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pathogenesis is suggested to be related with an existing scar defect or a microscopic dehiscent tract generated between the prior cesarean scar and the endometrial canal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We herein present a case of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy complicated with uterine rupture at 23 weeks’ gestation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare life-threatening form of ectopic pregnancy embedded in the myometrium of a previous cesarean scar. Pathogenesis is suggested to be related with an existing scar defect or a microscopic dehiscent tract generated between the prior cesarean scar and the endometrial canal. The most common risk factor is a history of previous cesarean section. Sonography is the firstline diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of CSP. It is possible to make the diagnosis in the early weeks of pregnancy and early diagnosis would let the patient retain her future fertility. Treatment options prior to rupture include expectant management, dilatation&curettage, conservative medical treatment, hysteroscopic-laparoscopic-primary open surgical removal or hysterectomy. We herein present a case of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy complicated with uterine rupture at 23 weeks’ gestation.

Özet

Sezaryen skar gebeliği, geçirilmiş sezaryen skar hattında myo-metriuma yerleşmiş hayatı tehdit eden nadir bir ektopik gebelik formudur. Patogenezin mevcut bir skar defekti ya da geçirilmiş sezaryen skarı ile endometrial kanal arasında oluşmuş mikroskopik dehisans traktusu ile ilişkili olduğu savunulmaktadır. En sık karşılaşılan risk faktörü geçirilmiş sezaryen öyküsüdür. Sezaryen skar gebeliğinde ilk basamak tanı aracı ultra-sonografidir. Erken gebelik haftalarında tanı konulması mümkündür ve erken tanı hastanın fertilitesini korumasına imkan sağlar. Rüptür öncesi tedavi seçenekleri arasında gözlemsel tedavi, dilatasyon&küretaj, konservatif tıbbi tedavi, histerosko-pik-laparoskopik-primer açık cerrahi ya da histerektomi sayılabilir. Burada, 23. gebelik haftasında uterus rüptürü ile komplike olmuş bir sezaryen skar ektopik gebelik olgusu sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞKAN, E., ÇAKIROĞLU, A. Y., ÇORAKÇI, A. (2008). Sezeryan skar gebeliğinde erken tedaviyi reddeden hastada 23.gebelik haftasında hayat kurtarıcı histerektomi vakası: Olgu sunumu. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 201–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/227101

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lai YM, Lee JD, Lee CJ, Chen TC, Soong YK. An ectopic pregnancy embedded in the myometrium of a previous cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 75: 573-6. 2.Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 398-400. 3.Fait G, Goyert G, Sundareson A, Pickens A Jr. Intramural pregnancy with fetal survival: case history and discussion of etiologic factors. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 472. 4.Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 220-7. 5.Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Cesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG2007; 114:253-63. 6.Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in cesarean scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 278-84. 7.Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Yan-Sheng Lin M, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 247-53. 8.Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002; 57: 537-43. 9.Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1372-81. 10.Deb S, Clewes J, Hewer C, Raine-Fenning N. The management of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy following treatment with methotrexate- a clinical challenge. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007: 30; 889-92. 11.Timor- Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Mandeville EO, et al. Successful management of viable cervical pregnancy by local injection of methotrexate guided by trans vaginal sonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:737-9.