Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Koitus sıklığı, servikal uzunluk ve ürogenital enfeksiyonların etkileşimleri obstetrik sonuçları etkiler mi?

Do the interactions between coital frequency, cervical length, and urogenital infection affect obstetric outcomes?

Pages
66–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:66-70

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine whether interactions between coital frequency, cervical length, and urogenital infection affect obstetric outcomes.Materials and Methods: A total of 268 unselected pregnant women were recruited in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study population consisted of four groups of women: group 1 (n=203) screened negative for bacterial vaginosis (BV) both in the first and second trimesters; group 2 (n=18) screened negative for BV in the first trimester but positive in the second trimester; group 3 (n=33) screened positive for BV in the first trimester but negative in the second trimester; and group 4 (n=14) screened positive for BV both in the first and second trimesters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:66-70
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether interactions between coital frequency, cervical length, and urogenital infection affect obstetric outcomes.Materials and Methods: A total of 268 unselected pregnant women were recruited in the study. The study population consisted of four groups of women: group 1 (n=203) screened negative for bacterial vaginosis (BV) both in the first and second trimesters; group 2 (n=18) screened negative for BV in the first trimester but positive in the second trimester; group 3 (n=33) screened positive for BV in the first trimester but negative in the second trimester; and group 4 (n=14) screened positive for BV both in the first and second trimesters. Urine culture, cervico-vaginal cultures, and bacterial vaginosis were screened between 11-14 weeks and 20-24 weeks. Results: Two hundred fifty women were eligible for analysis in the study after lost-to-follow up patients were excluded. Previous abortion >=1 and previous preterm delivery at 24-34 weeks >=1 were statistically significantly higher in group 2. The number of patients who were diagnosed as having preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) was statistically significantly higher in group 4. Sexual intercourse during the first trimester, cervical length during the second trimester, and history of preterm birth (PTB) were statistically significant risk factors for preterm birth <37 weeks (1.27; (1.12-1.44); 5.33; (1.84-15.41); 6.95; (1.58-30.54), respectively). Conclusion: Presence or treatment of BV did not influence rates of PTB. The probability of PPROM would be higher in patients who are BV positive both in the first and second trimesters. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:66-70

Özet

Amaç: Koitus sıklığı, serviks uzunluğu ve ürogenital enfeksiyon varlığı ve değişkenlerin etkileşimlerinin obstetrik sonuçlara etkileri.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamıza 268 gebe kadın dahil edildi. Dört gruba ayrıldı; grup 1 (n=203) hem ilk hem ikinci trimesterde bakteriyel vajinoz (BV) taramasında negatif, grup 2 (n=18) ilk trimesterde negatif, ikinci trimesterde pozitif, grup 3 (n=33) ilk trimesterde pozitif, ikinci trimesterde negatif, grup 4 (n=14) her iki trimesterde pozitif saptanan hastalardan oluşturulmuştur. On bir-14 gh ve 20-24 gebelik haftalarında idrar kültürleri serviko-vajinal kültürler ve bakteriyel vajinoz taraması yapılmıştır.Bulgular: Analizler kalan 250 kadın ile yapıldı. Abortus sayısı >=1 ve 24.-34. haftalar arası preterm doğumu >=1 olan hastalar grup 2'de anlamlı yüksek; PPROM tanısı alan hasta sayısı ise grup 4'de anlamlı yüksek saptandı. İlk trimesterde cinsel ilişki, ikinci trimesterde ölçülen serviks uzunluğu ve preterm doğum öyküsü sırası ile istatiksel olarak 37 gh'den önce preterm doğum için önemli risk faktörleri olarak saptanmıştır (1,27; (1,12-1,44); 5,33; (1,8415,41); 6,95; (1,58-30,54) sırasıyla). Sonuç: BV varlığı ve tedavisi preterm doğum oranını etkilememekte. Birinci ve ikinci trimesterde BV pozitif hastalarda PPROM artmakta. İlk trimesterdeki koitus sıklığı, ikinci trimesterde ölçülen servikal uzunluk ve preterm doğum öyküsü preterm doğum oranlarını etkileyen değişkenlerdir. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:66-70

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIROĞLU, Y., ÇALIŞKAN, Ş., DOĞER, E., KÖPÜK, Ş. Y., DÜNDAR, D., ÇALIŞKAN, E. (2015). Koitus sıklığı, servikal uzunluk ve ürogenital enfeksiyonların etkileşimleri obstetrik sonuçları etkiler mi?. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 66–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/376362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Iams JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1861. Oliver RS, Lamont RF. Infection and antibiotics in the aetiology, prediction and prevention of preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;33:768-75.
  2. Cunnington M, Kortsalioudaki C, Heath P. Genitourinary pathogens and preterm birth. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013;26:219-30. Manns-James L. Bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011;56:575-83.
  3. Laxmi U, Agrawal S, Raghunandan C, Randhawa VS, Saili A. Association of bacterial vaginosis with adverse fetomaternal outcome in women with spontaneous preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:64-7.
  4. McGregor JA, French JI. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55( Suppl 1):1-19.
  5. Kurki T, Ylikorkala O. Coitus during pregnancy is not related to bacterial vaginosis or preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1130-4.
  6. Yost NP, Owen J, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA, et al. Effect of coitus on recurrent preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:793- 7. Read JS, Klebanoff MA. Sexual intercourse during pregnancy and preterm delivery: effects of vaginal microorganisms. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:514-9.
  7. Jones C, Chan C, Farine D. Sex in pregnancy. CMAJ 2011;183:815-8.
  8. Bastek JA, Hirshberg A, Chandrasekaran S, Owen CM, Heiser LM, Araujo BA, et al. Biomarkers and cervical length to predict spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women. Obstetrics and gynecology 2013;122:283-9.
  9. Iams JD, Paraskos J, Landon MB, Teteris JN, Johnson FF. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstetrics Gynecol 1994;84:40-6.
  10. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1-103.
  11. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:297-301.
  12. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567- 72. Nygren P, Fu R, Freeman M, Bougatsos C, Guise JM. Screening and treatment for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: systematic review to update the 2001 U