Journals / İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Does the Choice of the Growth Potential Classification Affect the Non-surgical Treatment of the Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Büyüme Potansiyelini Değerlendiren Sınıflandırma Seçimi Cerrahi Dışı Tedavi Edilen Adölosan İdiyopatik Skolyozluların Tedavisini Etkiler mi?

Pages
123–128
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Miscorrelation of the two major growth potential classification systems should be considered to plan better non-surgical treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine the progression parameters effect for miscorrelation between the Risser sign and the Sanders classification and the accuracy of the determined level of the skeletal maturation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Patients with AIS who were followed up with non-surgical treatment between March 2018 and August 2020 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Miscorrelation of the two major growth potential classification systems should be considered to plan better non-surgical treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the progression parameters effect for miscorrelation between the Risser sign and the Sanders classification and the accuracy of the determined level of the skeletal maturation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Method: Patients with AIS who were followed up with non-surgical treatment between March 2018 and August 2020 were included in the study. The parameters taken into consideration were age, sex, weight, height, body mass index percentile, menarche status in females, Risser sign and Sanders classifications stages, major Cobb angle, location of the apex of the major curve, and correlation of the Risser sign toward the Sanders classification. Results: In total, 205 [126 (75.9%) females and 76 (24.1%) males] participants were included in the study. The rate of incorrect staging was 17.3% for the Risser sign toward the Sanders classification. Females were at a higher risk than males (p < 0.05). Patients who did not have their first menarche had a higher risk of miscorrelation for the Risser sign and Sanders classification (p < 0.05). Interobserver correlations were determined as A substantial correlation for the Risser sign and almost perfect correlation for Sanders classification (Risser K = 0.76, Sanders K = 0.93). Conclusion: Miscorrelation of the two major growth potential classification systems should be considered to plan better non-surgical treatment.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, adölosan idiyopatik skolyoz (AİS) hastalarında Risser işareti ile Sanders sınıflandırması arasındaki uyumsuzluğun ilerleme parametrelerine olan etkisini ve iskelet olgunlaşma düzeyinin doğruluğunu belirlemektir. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 2018 Mart ile 2020 Ağustos tarihleri arasında cerrahi dışı takip edilen AİS’li hastalar dahil edildi. Değerlendirme parametreleri yaş, cinsiyet, kilo, boy, vücut kitle indeksi, kadınlar için menarj durumu, Risser İşareti ve Sanders sınıflamasındaki evresi, majör cobb açısı, majör eğriliğin lokalizasyonu ve Risser işareti ile Sanders sınıflandırması arasındaki korelasyondur. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 205 [126 (%75,9) kadın, 76 (%24,1) erkek] katılımcı dahil edildi. Risser İşareti ile Sanders sınıflamasın arasında ki korelasyona uymayan hasta oranı %17,3, olarak saptandı. Kadınlarda ve adet görmemiş kişilerde sınıflandırmalar arasında uyuşmazlık oranının daha yüksek düzeyde olduğu saptandı (p < 0,05). Gözlemciler arası korelasyon Risser İşareti için yüksek, Sander sınıflaması için neredeyse mükemmel olarak saptandı (Risser К = 0,76, Sanders К = 0,93). Sonuç: Cerrahi dışı tedavi daha iyi planlamak için iki majör büyüme potansiyel sınıflama sistemin uyumsuzlukları dikkate alınmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, E. D., AKPOLAT, A. O., BALİOĞLU, M. B., KILINÇ, B. E., GÜLTEKİN, O., KOCABIYIK, A., AKGÜN, E. (2022). Does the Choice of the Growth Potential Classification Affect the Non-surgical Treatment of the Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 123–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/550947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Li DT, Cui JJ, DeVries S, Nicholson AD, Li E, Petit L, et al. Humeral head ossification predicts peak height velocity timing and percentage of growth remaining in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018
  2. e546. https:// doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001232 2. Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007
  3. S91-100. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ead9 3. Little DG, Song KM, Katz D, Herring JA. Relationship of Peak Height Velocity to Other Maturity Indicators in Idiopathic Scoliosis in Girls*. JBJS. 2000
  4. 93 doi: 10.2106/00004623-200005000-00009 4. Dimeglio A, Canavese F. Progression or not progression? How to deal with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis during puberty. J Child Orthop. 2013
  5. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0463-6 5. RISSER JC. The Iliac Apophysis: An Invaluable Sign in the Management of Scoliosis. A Publ Assoc Bone Jt Surg | CORR®. 1958
  6. Avaliable from: https://journals.lww.com/clinorthop/Citation/1958/01110/The_Iliac_ Apophysis__AnInvaluable_Sign_in_the.14.as 6. Sanders JO, Khoury JG, Kishan S, Browne RH, Mooney JF 3rd, Arnold KD, et al. Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008
  7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00004. 7. Minkara A, Bainton N, Tanaka M, Kung J, DeAllie C, Khaleel A, et al. High risk of mismatch between sanders and risser staging in adolescent ıdiopathic scoliosis: are we guiding treatment using the wrong classification? J Pediatr Orthop. 2020
  8. doi: 10.1097/ BPO.0000000000001135. 8. Vira S, Husain Q, Jalai C, Paul J, Poorman GW, Poorman C, et al. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Sanders classification versus the Risser stage. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017
  9. e246-9. doi: 10.1097/ BPO.0000000000000891. 9. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, et al. Adolescent ıdiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. JBJS. 2001
  10. Avaliable from: http:// www.ejbjs.org/cgi/content/abstract/83/8/1169 10. Karol LA, Johnston 2nd CE, Browne RH, Madison M. Progression of the curve in boys who have idiopathic scoliosis. JBJS. 1993
  11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00010 11. Little DG, Sussman MD. The Risser sign: a critical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994
  12. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199409000-00003. 12. Noordeen MHH, Haddad FS, Edgar M