Journals / İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Retrospective Analysis of Colonoscopic Polypectomy Results at University of Health Sciences Turkey Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital

Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kolonoskopik Polipektomi Sonuçlarının Retrospektif Analizi

Pages
236–240
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since it is impossible to determine the risk endoscopically, all polyps detected during endoscopy should be removed or coagulated and followed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Colorectal polyps are tissue masses originating from the mucosa and submucosa in the gastrointestinal system and extending into the intestinal lumen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: 2,267 colonoscopy reports made in the Gastroenterology Endoscopy Unit at University of Health Sciences Turkey Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between 2013 - 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since it is impossible to determine the risk endoscopically, all polyps detected during endoscopy should be removed or coagulated and followed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 - 2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Colorectal polyps are tissue masses originating from the mucosa and submucosa in the gastrointestinal system and extending into the intestinal lumen. Since polyps have a risk of cancer, the detected polyp should be removed by colonoscopy and examined histopathologically. In our study, we evaluated polyps that were removed colonoscopically and underwent histopathological examination. Method: 2,267 colonoscopy reports made in the Gastroenterology Endoscopy Unit at University of Health Sciences Turkey Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between 2013 - 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were analyzed according to polyp incidence, male-female ratio, average age, polyp location and polyp type. Results: Colonoscopy was performed on 2,267 patients for various reasons, and polyps were found in 302 (13.3%). One hundred seventy three (57.3%) of the cases were rectosigmoid, 67 (22.7%) descending colon, 47 (15.6%) transverse colon, 35 (11.6%) ascending colon and 13 (4.3%) polyps were seen in the cecum. 168 (55.6%) adenoma, 120 (39.7%) tubular adenoma, 41 (13.6%) tubulovillous adenoma, 7 (2.3%) villous adenoma, 30 (7%) inflammatory polyps, 10 (3.3%) were mucosal, 3 (1%) were serrated, 2 (0.7%) were lipomas. 52 (17.2%) of the cases were determined as adenocarcinoma and 71 (23.5%) as hyperplastic polyps. According to their size, 227 (75.2%) of the polyps were below 1 cm and 75 (24.8%) were over 1 cm. Conclusion: The results in our study were found to be compatible with the literature. Since it is impossible to determine the risk endoscopically, all polyps detected during endoscopy should be removed or coagulated and followed.

Özet

Amaç: Kolorektal polipler gastrointestinal sistemde mukoza ve submukozadan köken alan ve barsak lümeni içine uzanan doku kütlesidir. Poliplerin kanserleşme riski olduğundan tespit edilen polip kolonoskopiyle çıkarılarak histopatolojik incelenmelidir. Çalışmamızda kolonoskopi ile tespit edilen ve çıkarılan poliplerin sıklığı, boyutu, lokalizasyonu ve histopatolojik olarak özelliklerini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntem: Sağlık Bilimler Üniversitesi Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde 2013 - 2015 yılları arasında Gastroenteroloji Endoskopi Ünitesi'nde yapılan 2.267 kolonoskopi raporu retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar polip görülme oranı, erkek - kadın oranı, yaş ortalaması, polip yerleşim yeri ve polip cinsine göre analiz edildi. Bulgular: Ünitemizde çalışmaya alınan kolonoskopi yapılmış olan 2.267 hastanın, 302’sinde (%13,3) polip saptandı. Olguların 173’ü (%57,3) rektosigmoid, 67’si (%22,7) inen kolon, 47’si (%15,6) transvers kolon, 35’i (%11,6) çıkan kolonda ve 13’ü (%4,3) çekumda polip vardır. Poliplerin 168’i (%55,6) adenom, 120’si (%39,7) tubuler adenom, 41!i (%13,6) tubulovillöz adenom, 7’si (%2,3) villöz adenom, 30’u (%7) enflamatuvar polip, 10’ü (%3,3) mukozal, 3’ü (%1) serrated, 2’si (%0,7) lipomdur. Olguların 52’si (%17,2) adenokarsinom, 71’i (%23,5) hiperplastik polip olarak belirlenmiştir. Boyutlarına göre poliplerin 227’si (%75,2) 1 cm altında, 75’i (%24,8) 1 cm üzerinde idi. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda polip prevalansı literatürle uyumlu olarak bulunması yanısıra displazi ve adenokarsinom oranının yüksek olması kolonoskopi ile taramanın ve patolojik takiplerinin önemli olduğu sonucunu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUMBASAR, A., TABAK, Ö., IRAK, K., İNCEBACAK, A. T. (2022). Retrospective Analysis of Colonoscopic Polypectomy Results at University of Health Sciences Turkey Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital. İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 236–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/550941

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Korkmaz H, Kendir İC, Akkaya Ö. Kolon poliplerinin boyut, lokalizasyon ve histopatolojik yapılarının değerlendirilmesi. Endoscopy. 2016;24:13-7
  2. Heitman SJ, Ronksley PE, Hilsden RJ, Manns BJ, Rostom A, Hemmelgarn BR. Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.032
  3. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281301
  4. Bersentes K, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS. Lack of spontaneous regression of tubular adenomas in two years of follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:1117
  5. Kono S, Ahn Y. Vegetables, cereals and colon cancer mortality long-term trend in Japan. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000;9:363-5. doi: 10.1097/00008469- 200010000-00011
  6. Gönen Ö, Okan A, İlçin G. Kolon ve ince barsak tümörleri. Temel iç hastalıkları. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2005:1601-8
  7. Kalaycı G. Kolon kanserleri, genel cerrahi. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2002;2:1343-59
  8. Topuz E, Aykan FN. Sindirim Sistemi Kanserleri. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi: Onkoloji Enstitüsü Yayınları; 1998:373-475
  9. American Cancer Society Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Last Medical Review: February 21, 2018 Last Revised: May 30, 2018. Kaynağa erişilemedi 10. Gupta S, Lieberman D. Anderson JC. Recommendations for followup after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1131-53. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.026
  10. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A CA Cancer Statistics, 2021 Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654
  11. The American Cancer Society Medical and Editorial Content Team. Key Statistics for Colorectal Cancer. Last Medical Review: February 21, 2018, Last Revised: January 8, 2020. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/ cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/about/key-statistics.html
  12. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer; American Cancer Society. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872-85. doi: 10.1053/j. gastro.2006.0