Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Üçlü portal teknik ile anatomik tek bant ön çapraz bağ rekonstrüksiyonu

Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with three portal technique

Pages
368–374
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This technique is an applicable technique with good results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Anatomic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament is becoming more important as the knee anatomy and biomechanics are being understood much more.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: The study included 43 patients (four female, 39 males; mean age 29.3 years; range 18 to 42) with ACL injury.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This technique is an applicable technique with good results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Anatomic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament is becoming more important as the knee anatomy and biomechanics are being understood much more. In order to place femoral tunnel at its original point, it should be drilled from another porta which is more medial instead of from tibial tunnel. In this article we aimed to present clinical and radiologic results of ACL reconstructions that we placed femoral tunnel from a third anteromedial portal. Material and methods: The study included 43 patients (four female, 39 males; mean age 29.3 years; range 18 to 42) with ACL injury. ACL reconstruction was performed to all of the patients with the three portal anatomic single bundle technique using hamstring autograft. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation was done by Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Anteroposterior instability evaluation was done by anterior drawer and pivot shift tests. Results: According to IKDC score, preoperatively 22 patients were D (51%) and 21 were C (49%) and postoperatively 33 were A (%76), 10 were B (%23) and 1 was C (%2). Preoperative mean Lysholm knee score was 54,87 and increased to 89,86 at the last control. Tegner activity score was 4,70 preoperatively and 5,22 postoperatively. Conclusion: In ACL reconstruction, restoring knee biomechanics is possible by placing graft near normal anatomy. As defined for this purpose, three portal technique can place tibial and femoral tunnel as anatomic as possible. This technique is an applicable technique with good results.

Özet

Amaç: Diz anatomisi ve biyomekaniğinin daha iyi anlaşılmasıyla birlikte son zamanlarda ön çapraz bağın (ÖÇB) anatomik rekonstrüksiyonu önem kazanmıştır. Femur tünelinin anatomik açılabilmesi için tibia tünelinden bağımsız olarak ayrı drillenmesi önerilmiştir. Biz de bu çalışmada üçüncü bir anteromedial portalden femur tüneli açarak anatomik ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu uyguladığımız hastalarımızın klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarını sunmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu uygulanan 43 hasta (dört kadın, 39 erkek; ortalama yaş 29,3 yıl; dağılım 18-42 yıl) çalışma grubunu oluşturdu. Tüm hastalara artroskopik üçlü portal anatomik rekonstrüksiyon tekniği ile hamstring otogrefti kullanılarak ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu uygulandı. Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası klinik değerlendirme Lysholm diz skoru, Tegner aktivite skoru ve İnternasyonel Diz Dokumantasyon Komitesi Değerlendirme Formuna (IKDC) göre yapıldı. Anteroposterior stabilite değerlendirilmesi ön çekmece testi ve pivot shift testi ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi IKDC skorlamasında 22 olgu D (%51) 21 olgu C (%49) grubundayken ameliyat sonrası 33 olgu A (%76), 10 olgu B (%23) ve 1 olgu C (%2) grubundaydı. Ameliyat öncesi ortalama 54,87 olan Lysholm skorunun son kontrolde 89,86'ya yükseldiği görüldü. Tegner aktivite skorları ortalaması ameliyat öncesi 4,70 iken ameliyat sonrası 5,22 olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuç: ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonunda diz biyomekaniğini normale tekrar getirmek greftin anatomiye en yakın şekilde yerleştirilmesi ile mümkündür. Bu amaçla tanımlanan üçlü portal teknik hem tibial hem de femoral tüneli anatomiye yakın açılabilmektedir. Bu teknik iyi sonuçları ile uygulanabilir bir teknik olarak değerlendirilmelidir

🔖

Cite This Article

SİPAHİOGLU, S., SARİKAYA, B. (2022). Üçlü portal teknik ile anatomik tek bant ön çapraz bağ rekonstrüksiyonu. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 368–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/549259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Menetrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14(3):204- 13. Harner CD, Giffin JR, Dunteman RC, Annunziata CC, Friedman MJ. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 2001;50:463-74. Jacobsen K. Osteoarthrosis following insufficiency of the cruciate ligaments in man. A clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1977;48(5):520-6.
  2. Bach JM, Hull ML. Strain inhomogeneity in the anterior cruciate ligament under application of external and muscular loads. J Biomech Eng 1998;120(4):497-503.
  3. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Luetzow WF, Csintalan RP, Phelan D, et al. Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med 2005;33(3):335-46.
  4. Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Tohyama H. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2010;26(9 Suppl):S21-34. Cha PS, Brucker PU, West RV, Zelle BA, Yagi M, Kurosaka M, et al. Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic approach. Arthroscopy 2005;21(10):1275. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double- bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 2007;23(6):618-28.
  5. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 1994;22(5):632-44.
  6. Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2003;31(1):2-11.
  7. Yunes M, Richmond JC, Engels EA, Pinczewski LA. Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 2001;17(3):248-57.
  8. Brophy RH, Voos JE, Shannon FJ, Granchi CC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, et al. Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single- bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2008;36(11):2196-203.
  9. Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, et al. Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric position