Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

A research on examination of medical errors through court judgments

Pages
443–449
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, establishing mechanism to minimize medical errors, increasing the level of awareness of medical staff about medical errors, to minimize wrong treatment method and surgical errors thought to be effective strategies to prevent medical errors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Medical errors are one of the most important and chronic problems of health care systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, medical error cases decided by the Supreme Court were examined.Material and Methods: The work is retrospective, descriptive and analytical, and it is limited to civil court decisions on a suit for error.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, establishing mechanism to minimize medical errors, increasing the level of awareness of medical staff about medical errors, to minimize wrong treatment method and surgical errors thought to be effective strategies to prevent medical errors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Medical errors are one of the most important and chronic problems of health care systems. In this study, medical error cases decided by the Supreme Court were examined.Material and Methods: The work is retrospective, descriptive and analytical, and it is limited to civil court decisions on a suit for error. Sixty court decisions that were randomly selected in the study were obtained via www.yargitay.gov.tr and www.kazanci.com.tr. The decisions were examined in detail by researchers.Results: According to the research result, it is understood that the medical errors mostly occur in gynecology and obstetrics and general surgery branches. Treatment errors are the most important cause of medical errors. Material and moral damage ranks first, and death ranks the second due to medical errors. It has been revealed that the predominant responsibilities of medical errors are on physicians in large part. The two most common causes of medical errors are the choice of the wrong treatment method and surgical errors.Conclusion: In the light of the analyzes, it is seen that medical errors are largely human-induced factors. Therefore, establishing mechanism to minimize medical errors, increasing the level of awareness of medical staff about medical errors, to minimize wrong treatment method and surgical errors thought to be effective strategies to prevent medical errors.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, H., CAKMAK, C., KİDAK, L. B. (2022). A research on examination of medical errors through court judgments. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 443–449. https://ajindex.com/articles/549104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Flotta D, Rizza P, Bianco A, Pileggi C, Pavia M. Patient safety and medical errors: knowledge, attitudes and behavior among Italian hospital physicians. Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24(3):258-65.
  2. Avcı K, Aktan T. Bir sistem sorunu olarak tıbbi hatalar ve hasta Güvenliği. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2015;5(2):48-54. Conerly C. strategies to increase reporting of near misses and adverse events. J Nurs Care Qual 2007;22(2):102-6.
  3. Karsh BT, Escoto HK, Beasley WJ, Holden JR. Toward a theoretical approach to medical error reporting system research and design. Appl Ergon 2006;37(3):283-95.
  4. Beasley WJ, Escoto HK, Karsh BT. Design elements for a primary care medical error reporting system. WMJ 2004;103(1):56-9.
  5. Mayo MA, Duncan D. Nurse perception of medication errors. What we need to know for patient safety. J Nurs Care Qual 2004;19(3):209-17.
  6. Lawton R, Parker D. Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11(1):15-8.
  7. Zohar D, Livne Y, Orly TG, Admi H, Donchin Y. Healthcare climate: a framework for measuring and improving patient safety. Crit Care Med 2007;35(5):1312-7.
  8. Naveh E, Katz-Navon T, Stern Z. Treatment errors in healthcare: a safety climate approach. Manage Sci 2005;51(6):948-60. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000;320(7237):768-70.
  9. İntepeler SŞ, Dursun M.Tıbbi hatalar ve tıbbi hata bildirim sistemleri. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2012;15(2):129-35. Tümer AR. 1995-2000 yıllarında yüksek sağlık şurası’na gelen genel cerrahi vakalarının malpraktis açısından incelenmesi. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2003;19(1):11-6.
  10. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse event in hospitalized patients results of the harvard medical practice study II. e N Eng J Med 1991;324(6):377-84
  11. Smith M, Groenewegen PP, Timmermans DR, Wal G, Wagner C. The nature and causes of unintended events reported at ten emergency departments. BMJ Emergency Medicine 2009;9(16):1-11.
  12. Şahin AZ, Özdemir KF. Hemsirelerin tıbbi hata yapma egilimlerinin ıncelenmesi. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi 2015;12(3):210-4.
  13. Can Öİ, Özkara E, Can M. Yargıtayda karara bağlanan tıbbi uygulama hatası dosyalarının değerlendirilmesi. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2011;25(2):69-76.
  14. Giraldo P, Sato L, Sala M, Comas M, Dywer K, Castells X. A retrospective review of medical errors adjudicated in court between 2002 and 2012 in Spain. Int J Qual in Health Care 2016;28 (1):