Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Application of King’s Health Questionnaire in urology outpatient clinic

Üroloji polikliniğinde King Sağlık Anketi uygulaması

Pages
96–105
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical analysis was performed by Pearson’s chi-square and Student’s t-tests, and p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: From simple to complex, there is a wide range of problems involving the bladder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between November and December 2010, for a period of one month, 171 female patients applying to urology outpatient clinic for the first time with any complaints, were agreed to fill out KHQ.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical analysis was performed by Pearson’s chi-square and Student’s t-tests, and p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: From simple to complex, there is a wide range of problems involving the bladder. One of the most distressing situations for patients is urinary incontinence. A lot of questionnaire studies were conducted to understand this situation which many patients who did not want to explain. We aimed to apply one of the world's most widely administered questionnaires, King 's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), to our patients. Materials and Methods: Between November and December 2010, for a period of one month, 171 female patients applying to urology outpatient clinic for the first time with any complaints, were agreed to fill out KHQ. This survey is mainly composed of 9 questions. We divided the patients into two groups according to the second question which evaluates incontinence effect (the first group with no or mild complaints, the second group with moderate or severe complaints), and comparisons were made accordingly. Statistical analysis was performed by Pearson’s chi-square and Student’s t-tests, and p

Özet

inkontinanstır. Birçok hastanın açıklamak istemediği bu durumu anlamaya yönelik birçok anket çalışması yapılmıştır. Biz de dünyada en çok uygulanan anketlerden biri olan King Sağlık Anketi (KSA)’ni hastalarımıza uygulamayı amaçladık. Materyal ve Metot: Kasım ile Aralık 2010 arasında 1 ay süre ile üroloji polikliniğimize ilk defa herhangi bir şikayetle başvuran 171 kadın hasta KSA’ni doldurmayı kabul etti. Bu anket asıl olarak 9 sorudan oluşmaktadır. Biz anketin inkontinans etkisini değerlendiren ikinci sorusuna göre hastaları iki gruba ayırdık (hiç ya da az şikayeti olan ilk grup, orta ya da çok şikayeti olan ikinci grup) ve karşılaştırmaları buna göre yaptık. İstatistiksel değerlendirmeler Pearson kikare ve Student t-testleri ile yapıldı ve çalışmada anlamlılık düzeyi p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKKAYA, C. S., MEMİŞ, A., BULUT, S., AKTAŞ, B. K., DOLUOĞLU, Ö. G., AKDEMİR, A. Ö., DEMİREL, H. C., ERKMEN, A. E. (2022). Application of King’s Health Questionnaire in urology outpatient clinic. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 96–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/548457

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Thom DH. Overactive bladder: Epidemiology and impact on quality of life. Patient Care 2000; Winter Suppl: 6-14
  2. Wein AJ, Rovner ES. The overactive bladder: An overview for primary care health providers. Int J Fertil 1999;44:56-66
  3. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fail M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wem A. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international Continence Society. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2002;21:167-178
  4. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:1-16
  5. Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TW. Prevalance of urinary incontinence. Br Med J 1980;281:1243-5
  6. Herzog AR, Fultz NH. Prevalance and incidence of urinary incontinence in community dwelling populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:273-281
  7. Maral I, Özkardeş H, Peskircioğlu L,Bumin MA. Prevalence of stress urinary incontinence in both sexes at or after age 15 years: a cross-sectional study. J Urol 2001;165:408-12
  8. Özerdoğan N, Beji NK, Yalçın O. Urinary incontinence: its prevalance, risk factors and effects on the quality of life of women living in a region of Turkey. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004;58:145-50
  9. Buchsbaum GM, Chin M, Glantz C, Guzick D. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in a cohort of nuns. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:226-9
  10. Simeonova Z, Milsom I, Kullendorff AM, Molander U, Bengtsson C. The prevalence of urinary incontinence and its influence on the quality of life in women from an urban Swedish population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:546-51
  11. Wyman JF, Harkins SW, Choi SC, Taylor JR, Fantl JA. Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70(3 Pt 1):378-81
  12. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14(2):131-9
  13. Raz S and Erickson DR. SEAPI QMM incontinence classification system. Neurourol Urodyn 1992;11:187-92
  14. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 1996;47(1):67-71; discussion 71-2
  15. Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes