Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Gürültü kirliliği, psikiyatrik semptomlar ve yaşam kalitesi: Türkiye'nin Doğu Bölgesinde gürültü problemi

Noise pollution, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life: Noise problem in the East Region of Turkey

Pages
75–81
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to psychiatric SCL-90-R and SF-36 assessments, observed psychiatric symptoms were more pronounced between the high noise exposed group than other groups (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: As to clinical examinations, predisposition to aggression and aggressive behavior among drivers are very high in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:SCL-90-R and SF-36 questionnaire were used to assess the presence and severity of psychiatric symptoms and quality of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to psychiatric SCL-90-R and SF-36 assessments, observed psychiatric symptoms were more pronounced between the high noise exposed group than other groups (P
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: As to clinical examinations, predisposition to aggression and aggressive behavior among drivers are very high in Turkey. For this reason, direct correl ation between the noise pollution and general psychological symptoms with quality of life in public transport drivers were investigated in this survey. Material and Methods: Bus drivers of varying bus brands (F, O and P which has different noise levels) were subjected in this study. SCL-90-R and SF-36 questionnaire were used to assess the presence and severity of psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. Sound level meter (Smart Sensor AR844) was used for nois e pollution measurements (dB(A)) within the buses and city main streets. Results: According to the me asurements; F, O and P brand buses average 65.16 dB(A), 70.86 dB(A) and 75.33 dB(A) noise produces respectively. Especially, P brand mini-bus drivers were found to have worked under c ontinuously high noise (75.33 dB(A), average 11.22±3.86 hours daily). According to psychiatric SCL-90-R and SF-36 assessments, observed psychiatric symptoms were more pronounced between the high noise exposed group than other groups (P

Özet

Amaç: Kliniksel bulgulara göre, agresyona yatkınlık ve agrasif davranış Türkiye’de toplu taşıma sürücüleri arasında oldukça yaygındır. Bu sebeple, bu çalışmada, gürültü kirliliği ile psikolojik semptomlar ve yaşam kalitesi arasında doğrudan bir ilişki olup olmadığı toplu taşıma araç sürücüleri üzerinde araştırıldı. Materyal ve Metod: Çeşitli marka ve model araçta (Farklı gürültü seviyelerine sahip P, O, F marka araçlar) çalışan araç sürücüleri bu çalışmaya alınmıştır. Sürücülerin psikiyatrik semptom ve yaşam kalitesi analizleri için SCL-90-R ve SF-36 analiz ölçekleri. Şehir içi ana caddelerde ve araçların içerisindeki gürültü seviyesinin belirlenmesinde gürültü seviye ölçüm cihazı (Smart Sensor AR844) kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: Ölçümlere göre F, O ve P marka araçlar sırasıyla ortalama 65.16 dB(A), 70.86 dB(A) ve 75.33 dB(A) gürültü üretmektedirler. özellikle P marka araç sürücüleri sürekli olarak yüksek gürültü altında çalışmaktadırlar (75.33 dB(A) ortalama 11.22±3.86 saat günlük). Psikiyatrik SCL-90-R ve SF-36 değerlendirmelerine göre gözlenen psikiyatrik semptomlar yüksek gürültüye maruz kalan çalışanlarda diğer iki gruba göre daha belirgindi (P

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, Z., KORPINAR, M. A., YILMAZ, A., ÖZDEMİR, O. (2022). Gürültü kirliliği, psikiyatrik semptomlar ve yaşam kalitesi: Türkiye'nin Doğu Bölgesinde gürültü problemi. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 75–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/548441

References (14)

  1. Suter AH. The Hearing Co nservation Amendment: 25 Years Later. Noise Health 2009
  2. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.45306 2. Evans GW. The Psychological Costs of Chronic Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution. In R. L. Isaacson & K. F. Jensen (Eds.), Th e Vulnerable Brain and Environmental Risks, Volume 3: Toxins in Air and Water. New York: Plenum. 1994
  3. pp 167-182. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00014 3. Babisch W, Beule B, Schust M, Kersten N, Ising H. Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 2005
  4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147104.84424.24 4. Aydin Y, Kaltenbach M. Noise perception, heart rate and blood pressure in relation to aircraft noise in the vicinity of the Frankfurt airport. Clin Res Cardiol 2007
  5. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-007-0507-y 5. EPA Public health and welfare criteria for noise 1973
  6. . 550: 4-73-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DOI: 10.1002/9780470479216 6. Babisch W. Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence ha s increased. Noise Health 2006
  7. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.32464 7. Geen RG. Powers PC. Shock and Noise as Instigating Stimuli in Human Aggression. Psychological Reports, 1971
  8. 28, pp. 983-5. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1971.28.3.983 8. Mokhtar M, Kamaruddin S, Khan ZA, Mallick Z. A study on the effects of noise on industrial workers in Malaysia. J. Tech 2007
  9. 46(A): 17-30. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.44.584 9. Juang DF, Lee CH, Yang T, Chang MC. Noise pollution and its effects on medical ca re workers and patients in hospitals. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2010
  10. . 7(4): 705-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04319.x 10. Spreng M. Central nervous system activation by noise. Noise & Health 2000
  11. 2(7): 49-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00415- 003-0237-7 11. Berglund B, Lindvall T. Community noise. Document prepared for the World Health Organization. Archives of the Center for Sensory Research 1995
  12. 2(1): Stockholm, Center for Sensory Research. DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639- 00202 12. Maschke C, Rupp T, Hecht K. The influence of stressors on biochemical reactions – a review of present scientific findings with noise. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2000
  13. DOI: 10.1078/S1438-4639(04)70007-3 13. Banerjee D, Chakraborty SK, Bhattacharyya S, Gangopadhyay A. Appraisal and mapping the spatial temporal distribution of urban road traffic noise. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2009
  14. 6(2): 325-35. DOI: CNKI:SUN:QDHY.0.2001-01-0