SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT POST-AND-CORE SYSTEMS IN TEETH RESTORED WITH SINGLE CROWNS

Tek Kuronlarla Restore Edilen Dişlerde Farklı Post ve Kor Sistemlerinin Retrospektif Bir Değerlendirmesi

Fatih DEMİRCİ
Cevdet ÇALIŞKAN
Pages
73–83
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, opposing dentition, type of cement, and restoration exhibited a statistically significant difference with the post-and-core survival.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this retrospective clinical study, the aim is to evaluate the effect of the clinical survival rates of different post-and-core systems in terms of the age and sex of the population, type of restoration, tooth position, type of post material, effect of opposing dentition, and type of cement used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A retrospective analysis was conducted via spreadsheets that showed patients who were treated with post-and-cores between August 2016 and March 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, opposing dentition, type of cement, and restoration exhibited a statistically significant difference with the post-and-core survival.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cam fiber · Karbon fiber · Post ve kor

Abstract

In this retrospective clinical study, the aim is to evaluate the effect of the clinical survival rates of different post-and-core systems in terms of the age and sex of the population, type of restoration, tooth position, type of post material, effect of opposing dentition, and type of cement used. A retrospective analysis was conducted via spreadsheets that showed patients who were treated with post-and-cores between August 2016 and March 2020. A total of 524 records were included in the analysis according to the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. While a statistically significant difference between the post-and-core survival among age, restoration type, cement type, opposing dentition, and service time was determined (p<0.001), a statistically significant difference with tooth position and sex was not detected (p>0.05). The analyzes showed no evidence that different post-and-core systems (prefabricated glass and carbon fiber reinforced composite resin, cast metal and prefabricated metal) were significantly associated with post-and-core survival. However, opposing dentition, type of cement, and restoration exhibited a statistically significant difference with the post-and-core survival.

Özet

Bu retrospektif klinik çalışmanın amacı; popülasyon yaşının ve cinsiyetin, restorasyon tipinin, diş pozisyonunun, post materyal tipinin, karşıt dişlerin etkisinin ve kullanılan siman tipinin farklı post ve kor sistemlerinin klinik hayatta kalma oranına etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Ağustos 2016 ile Mart 2020 arasında post ve kor uygulanan hastaları gösteren elektronik tablolar üzerinde retrospektif bir analiz yapıldı. Dahil etme kriterlerine göre analize toplam 524 kayıt dahil edildi. Veriler Kaplan-Meier ve Cox orantılı risk analizi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Post ve korların hayatta kalma oranları ile yaş, restorasyon tipi, siman tipi, karşıt diş ve hizmet süresi faktörleri ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken (p<.001); diş pozisyonu ve cinsiyet faktörleri ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamadı (p>0.05). Analizler, post ve kor sağkalımı ile farklı post ve kor sistemlerinin (prefabrike cam ve karbon fiber destekli kompozit rezin, döküm metal ve prefabrike metal) önemli ölçüde ilişkili olduğuna dair bir kanıt göstermedi. Bununla birlikte, post ve kor sağkalımı ile karşıt diş, siman ve restorasyon tipi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, F., ÇALIŞKAN, C. (2022). RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT POST-AND-CORE SYSTEMS IN TEETH RESTORED WITH SINGLE CROWNS. İnönü üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 73–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/548246

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Al-Omiri, M. K., Mahmoud, A. A., Rayyan, M. R., Abu-Hammad, O. (2010). Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. Journal of Endodontics, 36(9),1439-1449.
  2. Baba, N. Z., Golden, G., Goodacre, C.J. (2009). Nonmetallic prefabricated dowels: a review of compositions, properties, laboratory, and clinical test results. Journal of Prosthodontics, 18, 527-536.
  3. Balkenhol, M., Wöstmann, B., Rein, C., Ferger, P. (2007). Survival time of cast post and cores: a 10-year retrospective study. Journal of Dentistry, 35(1), 50-58.
  4. Barfeie, A., Thomas, M. B., Watts, A., Rees, J. (2015). Failure mechanisms of fibre posts: A literature review. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 23(3), P115-27. Coelho, C. S., Biffi, J. C., Silva, G. R., Abrahão, A., Campos, R.E., Soares, C.J. (2009). Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts. Dental Materials Journal, 28, 671-678.
  5. Dammaschke, T., Nykiel, K., Sagheri, D., Schäfer, E. (2013). Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 39(2), 48-56.
  6. Dietschi, D., Duc, O., Krejci, I., Sadan, A. (2007). Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature--Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence International, 38, 733-743.
  7. Figueiredo, F. E., Martins-Filho, P. R., Faria-E-Silva, A. L. (2015). Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jounal of Endodontics, 41, 309-316.
  8. Fredriksson, M., Astbäck, J., Pamenius, M., Arvidson, K. (1998). A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(2), 151-157. Gómez-Polo, M., Llidó, B., Rivero, A., Del Río, J., Celemín, A. (2010). A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. Journal of Dentistry, 38(11), 916-920.
  9. Goracci, C., Ferrari, M. (2011). Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Australian Dental Journal, 56(1), 77-83.
  10. Heydecke, G., Peters, M. C. (2002). The restoration of endodontically treated, single rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. Journal of Prosth