Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

The Investigation of Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Solutions of A Locus Problem

Pages
39–58
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Contrary to paper-pencil solutions in the process of the software solution, prospective teachers got opportunity to try different solutions, to make hypothesis, to test their hypothesis and to make generalization by using the software and thus they reached expected solutions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate problem solving processes of prospective elementary mathematics teachers on locus problems by using paper-pencil and Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the research designed as a case study the partipicants were 19 senior prospective teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Contrary to paper-pencil solutions in the process of the software solution, prospective teachers got opportunity to try different solutions, to make hypothesis, to test their hypothesis and to make generalization by using the software and thus they reached expected solutions
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate problem solving processes of prospective elementary mathematics teachers on locus problems by using paper-pencil and Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS). In the research designed as a case study the partipicants were 19 senior prospective teachers. This data was collected by using diary notes and worksheets of the prospective teachers. The qualitative data were analyzed by following the stages suggested by the Miles and Huberman (1994, p.10): data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing/verification. In the research it was determined that prospective teachers experienced various situations such as diffuculty in understanding the question, guessing the answer, and making generalization in paper-pencil application. Contrary to paper-pencil solutions in the process of the software solution, prospective teachers got opportunity to try different solutions, to make hypothesis, to test their hypothesis and to make generalization by using the software and thus they reached expected solutions

🔖

Cite This Article

AÇIKGÜL, K., ASLANER, R. (2022). The Investigation of Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Solutions of A Locus Problem. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 39–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/547525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Açıkgül. K. ve Aslaner, R. (2012a). Matematik Öğretmen adaylarının geometrik yer kavramına ilişkin algıları ve sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Özet Kitapçığı, 27-30
  2. Haziran, Niğde Üniversitesi,
  3. Niğde. Açıkgül. K. ve Aslaner, R. (2012b). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının geometrik yer problemlerini çözüm sürecinde karşılaştıkları güçlükler ve bilgisayar destekli çözüm önerileri. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Özet Kitapçığı, 27-30
  4. Haziran, Niğde Üniversitesi,
  5. Niğde. Antohe G.S. (2009). Modeling geometric locus with Geogebra. Computer Science Series, 7(2),105-112.
  6. Baki, A., Güven, B. ve Karataş, (2002). Dinamik geometri yazılımı Cabri ile keşfedereköğrenme. V. Ulusal Fen bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 16—18 Eylül, ODTU, Ankara.
  7. Baki, A., Çekmez E. ve Kösa, T. (2009). Solving geometrical locus problems in Geogebra.Geogebra Conference, 14-15
  8. July, RISC in Hagenberg. Botana, F. and Valcarce, J. L. (2003). software tool for the investigation of plane loci.Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 61, 139-152.
  9. Botana, F., Aba' Nades, M. A. and Escrıbano J. (2011). Exact Internet AccessibleComputation of Paths of Points in Planar Linkages and Diagrams. ComputerApplications in Engineering Education, 19(4), 835-841
  10. Camargo, L. Sarnper, C. ve Perry, P. (2007). Cabri’s role in the task of proving Within the activity of building part of an axiomatic system. CERME 5, Working Group:Argumantation andProf, 571- 580. Ceylan, T. (2012). Geogebra Yazılımı Ortamında İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen adaylarının geometrik ispat biçimlerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi,Ankara Üniversitesi,
  11. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  12. Cha, S., Noss, R. (2001). lnvestigating students’ understanding of locus With dynamic geometry. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, Southampton meeting, November, 21(3), 84-89, http://WWW.bsrlm.org.uk/lPs/ip2l3/BSRLM-lP-2l-3Full.pdf adresinden 10.11.2011 tarihinde alınmıştır. Christou, C., Mousoulides N., Pittalis M. Ve Pitta-Pantazi D. (2004). Proofs thruough exploration in dynamic geometry environments. Proocedings of the 28thConference of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematic Education, 2,215-222.
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. De Villiers, M. (2008). Solving locus problem via generalization. publication ofthe Georgi