Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Exploring Novice And Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs And Practices Of Written Feedback

Mesleğe Yeni Başlamış Ve Meslekte Deneyimli İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Geri Bildirim Hakkındaki Düşünceleri Ve Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi

Pages
355–369
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most salient motives behind the practices and beliefs were: i teachers’ attitudes towards writing and errors, and the roles of teacher and students in writing; ii pre-service teacher education and experience; and iii school policies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explored written feedback beliefs and practices and their underlying factors from one novice and one experienced ESL teacher.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected over 15 weeks through two semi-structured interviews, three stimulated recall interviews based on three sets of student writing analyses, and three classroom observations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most salient motives behind the practices and beliefs were: i teachers’ attitudes towards writing and errors, and the roles of teacher and students in writing; ii pre-service teacher education and experience; and iii school policies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:yazı · yazılı geribildirim · öğretmen inanışları

Abstract

This study explored written feedback beliefs and practices and their underlying factors from one novice and one experienced ESL teacher. The study adopted a case study approach. Data were collected over 15 weeks through two semi-structured interviews, three stimulated recall interviews based on three sets of student writing analyses, and three classroom observations. Ten student portfolios, including each teacher’s written feedback practices over a semester, were also examined. Teachers’ written feedback on the student writing was grouped based on the scheme by Ferris (2007). The analyses revealed that both participants opted to provide written feedback for several reasons. Additionally, both teachers gave comprehensive corrective written feedback throughout the term for a variety of reasons. The most salient motives behind the practices and beliefs were: i teachers’ attitudes towards writing and errors, and the roles of teacher and students in writing; ii pre-service teacher education and experience; and iii school policies.

Özet

Bu çalışma, bir meslekte deneyimli ve bir mesleğe yeni başlamış öğretmenin geri bildirim uygulamaları hakkındaki deneyim ve gözlemlenebilir düşünceleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek, geri bildirim uygulamaları ardındaki sebeplerini analiz etmek için gerçekleştirildi. Bu çalışmada örnek durum inceleme metodu benimsendi. Veri, 15 haftalık bir zamanda, öğrencilerin yazıları üzerindeki geri bildirim analizlerine dayandırılan anımsamayı sağlayan görüşmeler (3 kez), yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler (2 kez), ve ders gözlemleri (3 kez) ile toplanmıştır. Ayrıca, her bir öğretmenin bir dönem boyunca vermiş olduğu geri bildirimi içeren 10'ar öğrenci portfolyo incelemesi de yapıldı. Portfolyolar Ferris (2007) tarafından önerilen analiz sekline göre değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar yeni ve deneyimli öğretmenin çeşitli sebeplerden dolayı geri bildirimin verilmesi gerektiği görüşünü ortaya çıkardı. Ek olarak, öğretmenlerin dönem boyunca geri bildirim verirken ana odak noktalarının bazı sebeplerden dolayı gramer olduğu görüldü. Öğretmenlerin geri bildirim uygulamaları arkasındaki sebeplerin; i öğretmenlerin yazıya ve hatalara karşı olan tutumları ve öğrenci ile kendilerinin yazıdaki rolleri, ii aldıkları eğitim ile deneyim ve iii kurumun yaptırımları olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAN, G. K., YİĞİTOĞLU, N. (2022). Exploring Novice And Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs And Practices Of Written Feedback. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 355–369. https://ajindex.com/articles/547410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alshahrani, A., & Storch, N. (2014). Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context: How do they align with their beliefs, institutional guidelines, and student preferences? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 101-122.
  2. Bailey, R. & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187-198.
  3. Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4),544-559.
  4. Beuningen, C. G., Jong, N.H. & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing. Language Learning 62(1), 1-41.
  5. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.
  6. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2009). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: a ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214.
  7. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher Cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teacher, 36(2), 81-109.
  8. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and teacher education: research and practice. London: Continuum. Bruno, I. & Santos, L. (2010). Written comments as a form of feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation 36, 111-120.
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th edn). London: Routledge Falmer. Conrad, S. M. & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 147-179.
  10. Diab, R. L. (2005). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study. TESL Canada Journal, 23(1), 28-42.
  11. Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J. & Tuioti, E. A. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: Practitioners’ Perspectives. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 47-77.
  12. Fazio, L. L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235-249.
  13. Ferris, D. (1995). Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple-Draft Composition Classrooms. TESOL QUARTERLY, 29(1), 33-53.
  14. Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C. & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher written commentary on student writing: