SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Teaching Competencies in Higher Education: A Needs Analysis Study Regarding to Develop Instructional Planning and Evaluation Course

Yükseköğretimde Öğretim Yeterlikleri: Öğretimde Planlama ve Değerlendirme Dersinin Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Bir İhtiyaç Analizi

Melis YEŞİLPINAR UYAR
Ahmet Doğanay
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was seen that this situation resulted from content and implementations that were not integrated into higher education and field-specific situations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to conduct a needs analysis regarding to develop Instructional Planning and Evaluation in course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was based on case study design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was seen that this situation resulted from content and implementations that were not integrated into higher education and field-specific situations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme dersi · öğretim yeterlikleri · yükseköğretim

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a needs analysis regarding to develop Instructional Planning and Evaluation in course. This study was based on case study design. Eight research assistants and two instructors participated in this study. Interview method was used in data collection and inductive content analysis approach was adopted in data analysis. The result of the analysis identified that goals, content, learning-teaching and measurement-evaluation processes of instructional planning and evaluation course did not completely meet the needs and expectations of research assistants. It was seen that this situation resulted from content and implementations that were not integrated into higher education and field-specific situations.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme dersinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir ihtiyaç analizi çalışması yapılmasıdır. Araştırma, durum çalışması yöntemiyle desenlenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını maksimum çeşitlilik örneklemesiyle seçilmiş sekiz araştırma görevlisi ve ölçüt örnekleme yöntemine göre belirlenmiş iki öğretim elemanı oluşturmuştur. Verilerin toplanmasında görüşme yöntemi kullanılmış, veriler araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan iki farklı yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde ise tümevarımsal içerik analizi yaklaşımından yararlanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda; öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme dersi amaçlarının, içeriğinin, öğrenme-öğretme ve ölçme-değerlendirme süreçlerinin araştırma görevlilerinin ihtiyaç ve beklentilerini tam anlamıyla karşılamadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu durumun yükseköğretimle ve alana özgü durumlarla bütünleştirilmeyen içerik ve uygulamalardan kaynaklandığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYAR, M. Y., Doğanay, A. (2022). Teaching Competencies in Higher Education: A Needs Analysis Study Regarding to Develop Instructional Planning and Evaluation Course. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/547311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Addison, W. E. & Stowell, J. R. (2012). Conducting research on student evaluations of teaching. In M. E. Kite (Ed.). Effective evaluation of teaching: A guide for faculty and administrators (pp. 1-12). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Akpınar-Wilsing, N. & Paykoç, F. (2004). Needs of future faculty members in relation to instructional planning, effective teaching and evaluation: A case study. Education & Science, 29(133), 71-82.
  2. Bergan, S. & Damian, R. (Eds.). (2010). Higher education for modern societies–Competences and values. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Boysen, G. A., Richmond, A. S. & Gurung, R. A. (2015). Model teaching criteria for psychology: Initial documentation of teachers’ self-reported competency. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 48-59.
  3. Brown, G. & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Routledge. Bümen, N. T. (2006). Doktora eğitimi yapan öğrencilere yönelik yürütülen “öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme” ile “gelişim ve öğrenme” derslerinin değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 6 (1) 7-52.
  4. Catano, V. M. & Harvey, S. (2011). Student perception of teaching effectiveness: development and validation of the Evaluation of Teaching Competencies Scale (ETCS). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(6), 701-717.
  5. Colet, N. R. & Durand, N. (2004). Working on the Bologna Declaration: Promoting intergrated curriculum development and fostering conceptual change. International Journal for Academic Development, 9 (2), 167-179.
  6. Cruickshank, D. R. & Metcalf, K. K. (1993). Improving preservice teacher assessment through on-campus laboratory experiences. Theory Into Practice, 32(2), 86-92.
  7. Day, C. (1990). United Kingdom: Managing curriculum development at Branston School and Community College. In C. Marsh, C. Day, L. Hannay & G. McCutcheon (Eds.). Reconceptualising school-based curriculum development (pp. 140-172). London: The Falmer Press.
  8. Deggs, D. M. (2005). An investigation of the relationship between teaching perspective and faculty development activities among faculty in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, USA. Dentith, A. M., Miller, A.C., Jackson, G. & Root, D. (2011). Developing globalized teacher education curriculum through interdisciplinary. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 13(1&2), 77-92.
  9. Donnelly, R. (2008). Lecturers' self-perception of change in their teaching approaches: Reflections on a qualitative s