Journals / İnfeksiyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of daily antibiotic usage in ministry of healt Ankara Training and Research Hospital

S.B. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi'nde bir günlük kesitsel antibiyotik kullanımının irdelenmesi

Pages
238–286
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that prophylactic antibiotic usage should be reevaluated in the authors' hospital, and also use of microbiology laboratory and co-operation with clinics should be increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate daily antibiotic usage and to obtain data in hospitalized patients for improvement of rational antibiotic usage strategies in the hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of the 450 hospitalized patients, 193 (42.8%) were using antibiotics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that prophylactic antibiotic usage should be reevaluated in the authors' hospital, and also use of microbiology laboratory and co-operation with clinics should be increased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate daily antibiotic usage and to obtain data in hospitalized patients for improvement of rational antibiotic usage strategies in the hospital. Daily consumption of antibiotics on a determined day in all departments, indications and appropriateness of indications in regard to clinical picture were recorded. Of the 450 hospitalized patients, 193 (42.8%) were using antibiotics. Ninetyseven patients (50.2%) were taking antibiotics for prophylaxis while 96 patients (49.8%) for treatment. Prophylactic antibiotic choice was appropriate in 52 of 97 patients (53.6%). Only 20 of 96 patients (20.8%) were on treatment according to the microbiological findings. Treatment was appropriate in regard to the clinical picture in 73 of 96 patients (78.5%). The results showed that prophylactic antibiotic usage should be reevaluated in the authors' hospital, and also use of microbiology laboratory and co-operation with clinics should be increased.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, akılcı antibiyotik kullanımına yön vermek amacıyla kliniklerde yatan hastalarda günlük antibiyotik kullanma oranı ve indikasyonlarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tüm kliniklerde yatan hastalarda belirli bir günde kullanılan antibiyotikler, kullanım indikasyonlan ve indikasyonlarm uygunluğu kaydedilmiştir. Buna göre yatan toplam 450 hastadan 193'ü (%42.8) antibiyotik tedavisi görüyordu. Bu hastaların 97'sine (%50.2) profilaktik, 96'sına (%49.8) tedavi amacıyla antibiyotik veriliyordu. Profilaksi alan hastaların 52'sinde (%53.6) antibiyotik seçimi profilaksi iç|n uygundu, infeksiyona yönelik antibiyotik tedavisi gören hastaların 20'sine (%20.8) mikrobiyolojik veriye göre tedavi uygulanıyordu. Tedavi gören hastaların 73'ünde (%78.5) tedavi klinikle uyumluydu. Sonuçlar; profilaktik antibiyotik kullanımının yeniden gözden geçirilmesi, hastanede kültür alma alışkanlığının artırılması ve diğer kliniklerle işbirliği gereğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞDEMİR, A., ERTEM, T. G., ARICA, A. N., BAKIR, A., ORUN, H., TÜLEK, N., ŞİMŞEK, H. (2022). Evaluation of daily antibiotic usage in ministry of healt Ankara Training and Research Hospital. İnfeksiyon Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 238–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/546563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kerns MP, Meyer GE. Concurrent antibiotic-usage review in a small hospital. Am J Hosp Pharmacy 1986; 43:1476-8
  2. Hecker MT, Aron DC, Patel NP, Lehmann MK, Donskey CJ. Unnecessary use of antimicrobials in hospitalized patients: current patterns of misuse with an emphasjs on the antianaerobic spectrum activity. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 972-8
  3. George RH. Do antibiotic policies have an effect? Infect Cont Hosp Ep 1997; 36:85-93
  4. North D. Controlling the costs of antibiotic resistance. Clin Ther 1993; 15 (Suppl A): 3-11
  5. American Society -of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 1999; 56:1839-88
  6. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Sande MA. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy. 33th ed. Vermont: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc; 2003
  7. Çakır N. Rasyonel olmayan antibiyotik kullanımının ekonomik sonuçları. KLİMİKDerg '2001; 14:35-40
  8. Erbay A, Çolpan A, Bodur H, Çevik MA, Samore MH, Ergönül Ö. Evaluation of antibiotic use in a hospital with an antibiotic restriction policy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 21: 308-12
  9. Berild D, Ringertz SH, Lelek M. Appropriate antibiotic usage according to diagnoses and bacteriological findings: report of 12 point-prevalence studies on antibiotic usage in a university hospital. Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34:56-60
  10. Usiuer G, Özgüneş İ, Leblebicioğiu H and Turkish Study Group. Antibiotic prescription rate in hospitalized patients: a multicenter prevalence study [Abstract] In: 13th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) Abstracts, 2003: Abstract No. P688
  11. Khvet RA, Dahl ML, Llerena A, Maimets M, Wettermark B, Berecz R. Antibiotic use in 3 European university hospitals. Scand J Infect Dis 1998; 30: 277-80.