Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 26

'To Be Supporter' In the Industrial Football Age

Endüstriyel Futbol Çağında "Taraftarlık"

Pages
289–316
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this perspective, the main effort is to give examples in both national and international levels and to discuss these examples from the perspective of critical social sciences literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article is based on a general consideration of football, particularly the processes of change determined on the ground of marketization, and the analysis of the concept “supporter”, which can be thought as a discussion topic accompanying these processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, considerable effort is put into the distinction between the “supporter” and the “audience/onlooker”, which has a relatively passive meaning and the tension that can be seen as stemming from this distinction in the age of “industrial football”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this perspective, the main effort is to give examples in both national and international levels and to discuss these examples from the perspective of critical social sciences literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article is based on a general consideration of football, particularly the processes of change determined on the ground of marketization, and the analysis of the concept “supporter”, which can be thought as a discussion topic accompanying these processes. In this study, considerable effort is put into the distinction between the “supporter” and the “audience/onlooker”, which has a relatively passive meaning and the tension that can be seen as stemming from this distinction in the age of “industrial football”. In this perspective, the main effort is to give examples in both national and international levels and to discuss these examples from the perspective of critical social sciences literature.

Özet

Bu makale, futbol alanında özellikle piyasalaşma temelinde belirlenen değişim süreçlerini genel olarak değerlendirme ve bu süreçlerle birlikte tartışılabileceği düşünülen ‘taraftarlık’ kavramının incelenmesi üzerine kurulmuştur. Makalede ‘taraftarlık’ kavramının görece daha pasif bir anlam içeren ‘seyircilikten’ ayrışması ve bu durumun ‘endüstriyel futbol’ çağında yarattığı düşünülebilecek gerilim üzerinde durulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu çerçevede uluslararası ve ulusal düzeylerde kimi örnekler verilmeye çalışılmış ve bu örnekler özellikle eleştirel sosyal bilim geleneği çerçevesinde tartışılmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYHAN, Ç., HATİPOĞLU, D., AYDIN, M. B. (2022). 'To Be Supporter' In the Industrial Football Age. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 26, 289–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/545003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. A.S. Roma Ultras manifesto: http://www.asromaultras.it/manifesto.html. (Erişim: 18 Nisan 2008)
  2. Akşar, T. (2005). Endüstriyel futbol. İstanbul:
  3. Literatür. Arık, M.B. (2004). Top ekranda. İstanbul:
  4. Salyangoz. Authier, C. ( 2002). Futbol A.Ş. İstanbul:
  5. Kitap. Bjelajac, S. (2005, 11-15 Jul). The social structure of football fans in the city of split. Presentation at the 8th international seminar democracy and human rights in multiethnic societies. Konjic-Bosna-Herzegovina. Boniface, P. (2007). Futbol ve küreselleşme. İstanbul:
  6. NTV. Conn, D. (1999). The new commercialism. İçinde: S. Hamil, J. Michie, C. Oughton (der.). A game of two halves? The business of football. London: Mainstream. Çevik, E. (2004). Ankaragücü taraftarından bir kesit. İçinde: Bora, T. (der.). Takımdan ayrı düz koşu. İstanbul:
  7. İletişim. Debord, G. (1996). Gösteri toplumu ve yorumlar. İstanbul:
  8. Ayrıntı. De Certau (1988). The practice of everyday life. London: University of California. Elias, N. & Dunning E. (1986). Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process. London: Blackwell. Fiske, John (1999). Popüler kültürü anlamak. Ankara:
  9. Ark. FSI (2008). Congress invitation. http://footballsupportersinternational.com/en/ (Erişim: 8 Mayıs 2008).
  10. Girtler, R. (2005).Terbiyesizliğin teorisi, İstanbul:Kale. Guilianotti, R. (2005). Towards a critical antropology of voice: the politics and poets of popular culture, scotland and football. Crituque of Antropology, Vol. 25,Is.4:339-359.
  11. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol 2, Lifeworld and system: a critiqe of functionalist theory. Boston-New York: Beacon. Hall, S. (1999). Popüler kültür ve devlet. İçinde: N. Güngör (der.). Popüler kültür ve iktidar. Ankara: Vadi. Hatıpoğlu D. & Aydın, B. (2007). Bastır Ankaragücü: Kent, kimlik, endüstriyel futbol ve taraftarlık. Ankara:
  12. Epos. Howard, S. & Sayce, R. (2002). Branding, sponsorship and commerce in football, Fact Sheet 11, University of Leicister. http:// standupsitdown.co.uk. (Erişim: 18 Nisan 2008).
  13. Il Movimento del Ultras (2007). Manifesto Ultras, www.movimentoultras.it/doc/ manifesto_ultras.pdf, (Erişim: 18 Nisan 2008).
  14. King, A. (1997). New directors, customers and fans: The transformation of english football in 1990’s. Sociology of Sport, Vol: 14/3, 226-244.
  15. King, A. (1998). The end of the terraces: the transformation of english football in 1990’s. London: Leicister University. King, A. (2001). Violent pasts: collective memory and football hooliganism. The S