Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 32

Professional standards in public relations: A survey on practitioners

Halkla ilişkilerde meslek standartları: Uygulayıcılara yönelik bir araştırma

Pages
63–85
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this vein, the literature on the professionalization of public relations have been presented and then the standads of professionalization in public relations have been put to test by operationalization of social projection theory among the practitioners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In modern industrial societies, the concept of “profession” stands at the center of the whole economic system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While contributing to the stability of the social order through the functions it performs, a profession also provides a social status to the professional.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this vein, the literature on the professionalization of public relations have been presented and then the standads of professionalization in public relations have been put to test by operationalization of social projection theory among the practitioners.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In modern industrial societies, the concept of “profession” stands at the center of the whole economic system. While contributing to the stability of the social order through the functions it performs, a profession also provides a social status to the professional. At the roof of a profession is the concept of work and for a work to be accepted as a profession, there are certain social processes to be fulfilled. This reseach deals with the social processes required for the professionalization of public relations in Turkish context through a social psychological perspective. In this vein, the literature on the professionalization of public relations have been presented and then the standads of professionalization in public relations have been put to test by operationalization of social projection theory among the practitioners.

Özet

Günümüz sanayi toplumlarında, tüm ekonomik sistemin merkezinde “meslek” kavramı bulunmaktadır. Meslek, yerine getirdiği işler ile toplumsal düzenin sürekliliğine katkıda bulunurken bir yandan da meslek sahibine toplumsal statü sağlamaktadır. Mesleğin temelinde “iş” kavramı bulunmaktadır ve bir işin meslek olarak kabul edilmesi için tamamlaması gereken toplumsal süreçleri vardır. Bu çalışmada görece yeni bir meslek olarak halkla ilişkilerin geçtiği toplumsal süreçler Türkiye özelinde sosyal psikolojik bir perspektiften sorgulanmaktadır. Bu çerçevede halkla ilişkilerin meslekleşmesi üzerine literatür incelemesi yapılmış ve Türkiye’de halkla ilişkilerin meslekleşme standartlarının durumu uygulayıcıların görüşleri doğrultusunda araştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCER, M. (2022). Professional standards in public relations: A survey on practitioners. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 32, 63–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/544954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Austin, E W ve Pinkleton, B E, (2006) Strategic Public Relations Management: Planning and Managing Efective Communication Programs, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers,
  2. London. Aydın, İ P (2002)
  3. Yönetsel Mesleki ve Örgütsel Etik, Ankara:
  4. Pegem Yayıncılık. Barber, B (1996) Meslekler Sosyolojisinde Bazı Sorunlar, Zafer Cirhinlioğlu (Der.), Meslekler ve Sosyoloji, Ankara:
  5. Gündoğdu Yayınları.
  6. Blewett, S (1994) Poetry and Public Relations: Reality in a Waterball of Glass, Journalism Educator, s.39-46.
  7. Boven, L V ve Loewenstein, G (2003) Social Projection of Transient Drive States, Society for Personality And Social Psyhology, 29, s.1159-1168.
  8. Bowen, S A (2007)
  9. Ethics and Public Relations, Institute for Public Relations, http://www.instituteforpr.org/essential_knowledge/detail/ethics_and_public _relations (Erişim: 01 Mart 2011).
  10. Bowen, S A (2004) Organizational Factors Encouranging Ethical Decision Making: an Exploration into The Case of An Exemplar, Journal of Business Ethics, 52, s.311-324.
  11. Brom, G M (1982) A Comparison of Sex Roles in Public Relations, Public Relations Review, 8, s.17-22.
  12. Brown, B J ve Clow, J E (2008)
  13. Introduction to Business, Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, USA. Cameron, T G, Sallot, M L ve Lariscy, R A W (1996) Devoloping Standarts of Professional Performans in Public Relations, Public Relation Review, 22, s.43-61.
  14. Caplow, T (1954)
  15. The Sociology of Work, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, http://www.questia.com (Erişim: 13 Temmuz 2009).
  16. Carl, L M (1982)
  17. Pr and Creativity, Journalism Educator, 37, s.6-8.
  18. Clement, R W ve Krueger J (2002) Social categorization moderates social projection, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, s.219-231.
  19. Conarroe, R R (1967) How to Plan and Organize a Public Relations Program, The Public Relations Quarterly, s.24-30.
  20. Cronbach, L J (1955) Processes Affecting Scores on “Understanding Others” and “Assumed Similarity”, Psychological Bulletin, 52, s.177-193.
  21. Cutlip, S, Center, A ve Brom, G (1985)
  22. Effective Public Relations, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Dozier, D M (1984) Program Evaluation and Roles of Public Relations Proctitioners, Public Relations Review, 10, s.13-21.
  23. Dozier, D M (2005) İletişim ve Halkla İlişkiler Uygulayıcılarının Örgütsel Rolleri, içinde: Grunig, J., E., Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik, E. Özsayar (Çev.), İstanbul:
  24. Rota Yayın. Durkheim, E (2006a)
  25. Sosyoloji Dersleri, A. Berkay (Çev.), İstanbul:
  26. İletişim Yayınları.
  27. Durkheim, E (2006b)
  28. Toplumsal İşbölümü, Ö. Ozankaya (Çev