Journals / İktisat Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 532

Human development approach and income distribution

Beşeri gelişme yaklaşımı ve gelir bölüşümü

Pages
25–31
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within this framework, the social costs of tight fiscal policies as a response to the crises during the last two decades will be analysed in terms of their effects on human development and income distribution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, human development approach will be analysed within the context of neoliberal restructuring of the state.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In connection with this, it will be argued whether the human development approach that is defined as the enlargement of people's choices reveals a paradigm shift vis-à-vis the traditional approaches perceiving economic growth or industrialisation tantamount to development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within this framework, the social costs of tight fiscal policies as a response to the crises during the last two decades will be analysed in terms of their effects on human development and income distribution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, human development approach will be analysed within the context of neoliberal restructuring of the state. In connection with this, it will be argued whether the human development approach that is defined as the enlargement of people's choices reveals a paradigm shift vis-à-vis the traditional approaches perceiving economic growth or industrialisation tantamount to development. Concurrently with the prevalence of the human development approach, economic policies promoted by the Washington Consensus have been effective particularly in the developing world. Within this framework, the social costs of tight fiscal policies as a response to the crises during the last two decades will be analysed in terms of their effects on human development and income distribution.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, beşeri gelişme yaklaşımı, devletin neoliberal yeniden yapılandırılması süreci kapsamında incelenecektir. Bağlantılı olarak, insanların seçeneklerinin genişletilmesi süreci şeklinde tanımlanan beşeri gelişme yaklaşımının, ekonomik büyümeyi ya da sanayileşmeyi kalkınma ile eşdeğer gören geleneksel yaklaşımlar karşısında bir paradigma değişimini ifade edip etmediği tartışılacaktır. Beşeri gelişme yaklaşımının yaygınlaşması ile eşzamanlı olarak, Washington Uzlaşısı çerçevesinde gündeme gelen ekonomi politikaları özellikle yeni gelişen ekonomileri etkilemeye başlamıştır. Bu kapsamda, özellikle son yirmi yılda yaşanan krizlerin aşılabilmesi için uygulanan sıkı maliye politikalarının toplumsal maliyetleri, beşeri gelişme ve gelir bölüşümü üzerindeki etkileri açısından incelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKBOĞA, A. (2022). Human development approach and income distribution. İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 532, 25–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/544358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adelman, Irma ve Erinç Yeldan (2000) "Is This the End of Economic Development?", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11 (1-2): 95-109.
  2. Cammack, Paul (2014) "The UNDP and the End of Human Development: A Critique of the 2013 Human Development Report", Working Papers Series: The Multilateral Development Banks and the Global Financial Crisis, No: 6, Southeast Asia Research Centre, http://www.academia. edu/8134292/The_UNDP_and_the_End_of_ Human_Development, (Erişim Tarihi: 30 Eylül 2014).
  3. Fine, Ben (2009) "Social Policy and the Crisis of Neo-Liberalism", The Crisis of Neo-Liberalism in India: Challenges and Alternatives konulu konferansta sunulan tebliğ, Tata Institute of So- cial Sciences (TISS) Mumbai and International Development Economics Associates (IDEAs), 13-15 Mart 2009, http://www.networkideas.org/ networkideas/editorfiles/file/Fine.pdf, (Erişim Ta- rihi: 1 Ağustos 2015). International Institute for Labour Studies, 2008, World of Work Report 2008, International Labour Offi- ce, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publica- tion/wcms_100354.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 8 Kasım 2014).
  4. Jahan, Selim (2015) "The Human Development Index - What It Is and What It Is Not", http://www.undp. org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2015/3/10/The- Human-Development-Index-what-it-is-and-what- it-is-not.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Haziran 2015).
  5. Martorano, Bruno, Giovanni Andrea Cornia, Frances Stewart (2014) "Human Development and Fis- cal Policy: Comparing the Crises of 1982-5 and 2008-11", Giovanni Andrea Cornia ve Frances Stewart (Ed.), Towards Human Development içinde, Oxford University Press, 221-244.
  6. Ranis, Gustav ve Frances Stewart (2005) "Dynamic Links between the Economy and Human Deve- lopment", DESA, Working Paper No: 8, http:// www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2005/wp8_2005. pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ocak 2015).
  7. Rodrik, Dani (2006) "Goodbye Washington Consen- sus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank's 'Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform'", Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (4): 973-987.
  8. Sen, Amartya (2000)
  9. Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books. Singh, Ajit (2012) "Financial Globalization and Human Development", Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development, 13(1): 135-151.
  10. Srinivasan, T.N. (1994) "Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel?", The American Economic Review, 84 (2): 238-243.
  11. Stockhammer, Eng