Journals / İktisat Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 534

Kalkınma paradigmasındaki dönüşümün temelleri üzerine

Pages
53–65
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By doing this, we try to dig into the bases of the transformation of development paradigm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The idea of development has undergone radical changes as compared to the periods starting with 1940s in which development economics was emerging as a new branch of economics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As well known, some development economists interpret this change as a progress, while others as decadence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By doing this, we try to dig into the bases of the transformation of development paradigm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The idea of development has undergone radical changes as compared to the periods starting with 1940s in which development economics was emerging as a new branch of economics. As well known, some development economists interpret this change as a progress, while others as decadence. Going beyond this debate of the mainstream development thinking, this study claims that the development paradigm has been transformed in accordance with the needs of the capitalist system. To this end, we try to present how theoretical approaches, which are brought to the fore in the mainstream development economics correspond to the needs of the capitalist system in the specific periods of time. By doing this, we try to dig into the bases of the transformation of development paradigm.

Özet

Günümüzde kalkınma düşüncesi, kalkınma iktisadı adı altında ayrı bir disiplin olarak görülmeye Meltem Kayıranbaşlandığı 1940'lı yıllarla karşılaştırıldığında çok farklı bir görünüm almıştır. Bu değişim, kalkınma iktisadı yazarlarınca farklı biçimlerde yorumlanmış, kimi yazarlara göre bir ilerlemeyi, kimi yazarlara göre ise bir gerilemeyi temsil ettiği ifade edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, anaakım kalkınma düşüncesi içerisindeki bu tartışmanın ötesine geçerek, kalkınma paradigmasının kapitalist sistemin ve sermayenin ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda dönüştürüldüğünü iddia etmektedir. Bu amaçla, anaakım kalkınma iktisadında ön plana çıkarılan teorik yaklaşımların kapitalist sistemin ihtiyaçlarına nasıl karşılık geldiği yapılan bir dönemlendirme çerçevesinde gösterilmekte, bu yolla kalkınma paradigmasındaki dönüşümün temel belirleyenleri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYIRAN, M. (2022). Kalkınma paradigmasındaki dönüşümün temelleri üzerine. İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 534, 53–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/544350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anderson, K. (1998), "Uncovering Marx's Yet Un- published Writings", Critique, No. 30-31, 179- 187 [Türkçesi İnsancıl, Mayıs 1997]. (http:// www.kevin-anderson.com/wp-content/uploads/ docs/anderson-article-uncovering-marx.pdf) Bellofiore, R. ve Fineschi, R. (2009), "Introducti- on", Bellofiore, R. ve Fineschi, R. (der.) Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives after the Critical Edition içinde, London: Palgrave - MacMillan. Carchedi, G. ve Roberts, M. (2013), "A Critique of Heinrich's 'Crisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Profit Rate to Fall, and Marx's Studies in the 1870s'", Monthly Review, 65:7 (Aralık). Cottrell, A. ve Cockshott, P. (2006), "Demography and the Falling Rate of Profit", Indian Development Review, IV-1, 39-59. http://users.wfu. edu/cottrell/profitrate.pdf Harvey, D. (2014), "Crisis Theory and the Falling Rate of Profit". basılmamış makale. Heinrich, M. (2012), An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital, New York: Monthly Review Press. (Almanca ilk baskısı: 2004). ------ (2013), "Crisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Profit Rate to Fall, and Marx's Studies in the 1870s", Monthly Review, 64:11 (Nisan). Marx, K. (2016), Marx's Economic Manuscripts of 1864-1865,
  2. Moseley, F. (der.), Leiden: Konink- lijke Brill NV. Marx, K. (2015),
  3. Kapital III, İstanbul:
  4. Yordam Kitap. Moseley, F. (2016), "Introduction", Marx's Economic Manuscripts of 1864-1865,
  5. Moseley, F. (der.) Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Mage, S. (2013), "Response to HeinrichIn Defense of Marx's Law", Monthly Review, 65:7 (Aralık). Reuten, G. ve Thomas, P. (2011), "From the "Fall of the Rate of Profit" in the Grundrisse to the Cyclical Development of the Profit Rate in Ca- pital", Science and Society, 75:1 (Ocak), 74-90.
  6. Roth, R. (2009), "Karl Marx's Original Manuscripts in the Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA): Another View on Capital" Bellofiore, R. ve Fineschi, R. (der.) Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives after the Critical Edition içinde, London: Palgrave - MacMillan. Roth, R. ve Moseley, F. (2002), "Guest Editors' Introduction", International Journal of Political Economy, 32:1 (Bahar), 3-13.
  7. Sperber, J. (2014), Karl Marx; 19. Yüzyılda Yaşanmış Bir Hayat, İstanbul:
  8. İletişim Yayıncılık. Vollgraf, C. ve Jungnickel, J. (2002), ""Marx in Marx's Words"? On Engels's Edition of the Main Manuscript of Book 3 of Capital", Inter- national Journal of Political Economy, 32:1 (Bahar), 35-78.
  9. Vygodskii, V. (2002), "Discussion, What Was It Actually That Engels Published in th