Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Integrating Individual Strategies in the Job Demands-Resources Theory

Pages
5–32
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is my hope that JD-R Theory will continue toinspire researchers and practitioners who want to promote employee well-being and effective organizational functioning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model was introduced in the 00’s to explain the causes of burnout.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The current paper expands the role of the individualin the JD-R theory even further by presenting strategies that individuals use to (i) deal directly with the unfavorableeffects of job characteristics including actual or anticipated loss of resources, namely coping and recovery; (ii) maximizefavorable effects, goal achievement and avoid losses, i.e., self-regulation and (iii) alter job characteristics such that theyare less demanding and more motivating, i.e., job crafting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is my hope that JD-R Theory will continue toinspire researchers and practitioners who want to promote employee well-being and effective organizational functioning.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model was introduced in the 00’s to explain the causes of burnout. Later it maturedinto JD-R theory that can explain how various employee and organizational outcomes develop. Job demands areresponsible for the health impairment process, whereas job resources initiate a motivational process. These processesoccur simultaneously and have unique as well as interactive effects on outcomes. The role of the individual in the formof personal resources was added in the JD-R theory more recently. The current paper expands the role of the individualin the JD-R theory even further by presenting strategies that individuals use to (i) deal directly with the unfavorableeffects of job characteristics including actual or anticipated loss of resources, namely coping and recovery; (ii) maximizefavorable effects, goal achievement and avoid losses, i.e., self-regulation and (iii) alter job characteristics such that theyare less demanding and more motivating, i.e., job crafting. It is discussed that individual strategies can be integrated inthe JD-R Theory, both as a mediator and a moderator of both processes. It is my hope that JD-R Theory will continue toinspire researchers and practitioners who want to promote employee well-being and effective organizational functioning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demerouti, E. (2022). Integrating Individual Strategies in the Job Demands-Resources Theory. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 5–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/542775

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aluja Fabregat, A., Blanch Plana, A., & Biscarri Gassió, J. (2003). Burnout syndrome and coping strategies: a structural relations model. Psychology in Spain, 7, 46-55. Ângelo R. P. & Chambel M.J. (2014) The role of proactive coping in the Job Demands–Resources Model: A cross-section study with firefighters. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 203-216.
  2. Bakker A. B. (2018). Job crafting among health care professionals: The role of work engagement. Journal of Nursing Management, 26, 321–331.
  3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328.
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job Demands–Resources theory. In C. Cooper & P. Chen (Eds.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37-64).
  5. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273-285.
  6. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170-180.
  7. Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.
  8. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.
  9. Billings, A. G. & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139-157.
  10. Brenninkmeijer, V., Demerouti, E., le Blanc, P. M., & Hetty van Emmerik, I. J. (2010). Regulatory focus at work: The moderating role of regulatory focus in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 15(7), 708-728.
  11. Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P., van Harrison, R., & Pinneau, S. R. (1975). Job demands and worker health, main effects and occupational differences. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Chan, D. W. & Hui, E. K. P. (1995). Burnout and coping among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong-Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 15-25.
  12. Cheng, C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in real life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 814-833.
  13. Cox, T. (