✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
It is shown that modified degree-day method gives higher estimations especially for fuel oil and natural gas.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper compares some of the different methods proposed for estimating fuel consumption for space and water heating.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In particular, Recknagel and ASHRAE modified Degree-Day methods are considered.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is shown that modified degree-day method gives higher estimations especially for fuel oil and natural gas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This paper compares some of the different methods proposed for estimating fuel consumption for space and water heating. In particular, Recknagel and ASHRAE modified Degree-Day methods are considered. It is shown that modified degree-day method gives higher estimations especially for fuel oil and natural gas.
Özet
Bu çalışmada gerek bina, gerekse su ısıtılması için gerekli yıllık yakıt miktarını tahmin etmek için önerilmiş farklı metodlar ve sonuçları karalaştırılmıştır. Derece-gün (ASHRAE) metodunun özellikle fuel oil ve doğal gaz için çok yüksek tahminler yaptığı, Recknagel metodunun ise gerçek tüketime daha yaklaştığı belirlenmiştir.
🔖
Cite This Article
MOSHIRI, S., İLERİ, A. (2022). Comparison of estimation methods for annual fuel consumption for space and water heating. Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 9–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/542721