Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

EXAMINATION OF OCCUPATIONAL RESILIENCE BELIEFS OF INSERVICE AND PRE-SERVICE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION TEACHERS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VARIABLES

Journal
IOJET
Pages
724–733
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings are discussed in the framework of the relevant literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Occupational resilience contributes teachers to adapt difficult conditions of teaching, to deal with obstacles and to maintain professional commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with this purpose, whether there is a significant difference between the occupational resilience beliefs of teachers and pre-service teachers, whether there is a significant difference in the occupational resilience beliefs of teachers according to their seniority and whether there is a significant difference in the occupational resilience beliefs of pre-service teachers according to type of university, the relational screening model has been used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings are discussed in the framework of the relevant literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Occupational resilience contributes teachers to adapt difficult conditions of teaching, to deal with obstacles and to maintain professional commitment. The purpose of this research is to compare the occupational resilience beliefs of early childhood education teachers and preservice teachers. In accordance with this purpose, whether there is a significant difference between the occupational resilience beliefs of teachers and pre-service teachers, whether there is a significant difference in the occupational resilience beliefs of teachers according to their seniority and whether there is a significant difference in the occupational resilience beliefs of pre-service teachers according to type of university, the relational screening model has been used. The data is collected from 275 participants via Occupational Resilience Beliefs Scale for Teacher Candidates. As the results of statistical analysis, there is a significant difference in the occupational resilience beliefs of early childhood education teachers and pre-service early childhood education teachers in favor of early childhood education teachers. On the other hand, there is no significant difference in the ccupationalresilience beliefs of teachers according to their seniority. There is no significant difference in the occupational resilience beliefs of pre-service teachers according to the type of university. The findings are discussed in the framework of the relevant literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖNMEZ, Ö., KARASULU, M., ZEMBAT, R., AŞANTOĞRUL, S. (2022). EXAMINATION OF OCCUPATIONAL RESILIENCE BELIEFS OF INSERVICE AND PRE-SERVICE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION TEACHERS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT VARIABLES. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 724–733. https://ajindex.com/articles/542372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arslan, G. (2015). Yetişkin psikolojik sağlamlık ölçeği’nin (YPSÖ) psikometrik özellikleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Psychometric Properties of Adult Resilience Measure (ARM): The Study of Reliability and Validity]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 344-357.
  2. Atik, E. (2013). Liseli ergenlerde bağlanma stilleri ve psikolojik sağlamlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkide öz yansıtma ve içgörünün rolü [The role of self-reflection and insight in the relationship between high school adolescents attachment styles and psychological resilience degree]. İstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Master Thesis). Barmby, P. (2006). Improving teacher recruitment and retention: The importance of workload and pupil behaviour. Educational Research, 247-265.
  3. Bouillet, D., Ivanec, T., & Milje, R. (2014). Preschool teachers’ resilience and their readiness for building children's resilience. Health Education, 435-450.
  4. Bowles, T., & Arnup, J. (2016). Early career teachers’ resilience and positive adaptive change capabilities. Australian Education Research, 147-164.
  5. Gallant, A., & Riley, P. (2014). Early career teacher attrition: New thoughts on an intractable problem. Teacher Development, 562-580.
  6. Garmezy, N. (1993). Children in poverty: Resilience despite risk. Psychiatry, 127-136.
  7. Gizir, C. (2007). Psikolojik sağlamlık, risk faktörleri ve koruyucu faktörler üzerine bir derleme çalışması [A literatüre review of studies on resilience, risk, and protective factors]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. Goldstein, L. (2005). Becoming a teacher as a hero's journey: Using metaphore in pre-service teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 7-24.
  8. Greenfield, B. (2015). How can teacher resilience be protected and promoted? Educational and Child Psychology, 52-68.
  9. Karaırmak, Ö. (2006). Psikolojik sağlamlık, risk faktörleri ve koruyucu faktörler [Resilience, risk, and protective factors]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(26), 129-142.
  10. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi [Scientific research methods]. Ankara:
  11. Nobel. Klag, S., & Bradley, G. (2004). The role of hardiness in stress and illness: An exploration of the effect of negative affectivity and gender. British Journal of Health Psychology, 137-161.
  12. Maddi, S., & Khoshaba, D. (1994). Hardiness and mental health. Journal of Personality Assessment, 265-274.
  13. Major, C., & Savin-Baden, M. (2011). Integration of qualitative evidence towards construction of academic kowledge in social science and pr