SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE PERCEIVED ICT LITERACY SCALE AMONG TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Ahmet Murat UZUN
Journal
IOJET
Pages
644–656
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The limitations of the scale were discussed and some implicationswere suggested.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the 17-item 3-factors perceivedICT literacy scale in a sample of Turkish undergraduate students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 284undergraduate students educated at different departments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The limitations of the scale were discussed and some implicationswere suggested.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the 17-item 3-factors perceivedICT literacy scale in a sample of Turkish undergraduate students. Previous research onmeasuring ICT literacy mostly focused on the technical competence dimension of the ICT use.The current scale not only considers the technical literacy but it also evaluates the informationliteracy. The scale consists of three factors, each of which refers to one dimension of theInformation and Communication Technology (ICT). Data were collected from 284undergraduate students educated at different departments. Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) using maximum likelihood estimation procedure was applied to test the psychometricproperties of the scale. Results of the CFA indicated that the scale showed acceptable levels ofvalidity. Considering the reliability values, all the subscales and the scale as a whole showedadequate reliability values. The limitations of the scale were discussed and some implicationswere suggested.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, A. M. (2022). PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE PERCEIVED ICT LITERACY SCALE AMONG TURKISH UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 644–656. https://ajindex.com/articles/542354

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Arke, E. T., & Primack, B. A. (2009). Quantifying media literacy: Development, reliability, and validity of a new measure. Educational Media International, 46(1), 53–65.
  2. Buckingham, D. (2009). The future of media literacy in the digital age: Some challenges for policy and practice. Medienimpulse, 2, 69–82.
  3. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259.
  4. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., … Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1042–1053.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Dinçer, S. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgisayar okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve ölçme – Değerlendirme araçlarının yapısı [Assessing computer literacy of secondary school students and structure of assessment - Evaluation instruments]. Elementary Education Online, 16(3), 1329–1342.
  6. Educational Testing Service. (2003). Succeeding in the 21st century: What higher education must do to address the gap in information and communication technology. Princeton, NJ: National Higher Education ICT Initiative. European Commission (2018). Council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Retrieved June 30, 2019, from http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5464-2018-ADD-2/EN/pdf
  7. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education. Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Keßel, Y. (2013). Assessing individual differences in basic computer skills. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(4), 263-275.
  8. Gök, A., & Yıldırım, Z. (2015). Investigation of FATİH project within the scope of teachers, school administrators and YEGITEK administrators’ opinions: A multiple case study. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 6–8.
  9. Greiff, S., Kretzschmar, A., Müller, J. C., Spinath, B., & Martin, R. (2014). The computerbased assessment of complex problem solving and how it is influenced by students’ information and communication technology literacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 666-680.
  10. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Hair, J. F., Black,