SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

EFFECTIVENESS OF UTILIZING SCENARIO-BASED INSTRUCTION TO TEACH “FUNCTIONS” TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS CLASSES

Neslihan USTA
Şeyma SÖYLEMEZ
Journal
IOJET
Pages
1791–1821
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analyses, it wasobserved that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores infavor of the post-test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of teaching the subject of “Functions”,utilizing scenarios associated with everyday life, to high school students in terms of theiracademic achievements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out with twenty 10th grade students at a highschool in a district of Bartin, Turkey in the 2018–2019 school year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analyses, it wasobserved that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores infavor of the post-test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018–2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of teaching the subject of “Functions”,utilizing scenarios associated with everyday life, to high school students in terms of theiracademic achievements. The study was carried out with twenty 10th grade students at a highschool in a district of Bartin, Turkey in the 2018–2019 school year. In the study, which wasbased on the Mixed Methods, a weak quasi-experimental design with one pre-test and post-testgroup, was employed. Function achievement test (FAT) and semi-structured student interviewform (SSIF) were used as data collection tools. During the study, scenarios and activities withthe examples of daily life related subject of functions were applied for a period of 8 weeks. Inthe research, the quantitative data were analyzed via the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test, and thequalitative data were analyzed using the coding technique. As a result of the analyses, it wasobserved that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores infavor of the post-test.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTA, N., SÖYLEMEZ, Ş. (2022). EFFECTIVENESS OF UTILIZING SCENARIO-BASED INSTRUCTION TO TEACH “FUNCTIONS” TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS CLASSES. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 1791–1821. https://ajindex.com/articles/542269

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akkoç, H. (2006). Concept images evoked by multiple representations of functions. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(30), 1–10.
  2. Altun, M. (2010). Primary education second level mathematics [İlköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretimi]. Bursa, Aktüel Yayıncılık. Argün, Z., Arıkan, A., Bulut, S., & Halıcıoğlu, S. (2014). Basics of Basic Mathematics Concepts [Temel Matematik Kavramların Künyesi]. Ankara:
  3. Gazi Kitabevi.
  4. Baki, A. (2018). Knowledge of teaching math [Matematiği öğretme bilgisi]. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi. Bayazıt, İ. (2010). Fonksiyonlar konusunun öğretiminde karşılaşılan zorluklar ve çözüm önerileri (Difficulties faced in teaching the subject of functions and solutions). M. F. Özmantar, E. Bingölbali & H. Akkoç. (Eds.), Matematiksel Kavram Yanılgıları ve Çözüm Önerileri (Mathematical Misconceptions and Solution Suggestions) (pp. 92–104). Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Bayazıt, İ. & Aksoy, Y. (2010). Pedagogical views of teachers about the concept and teaching of function [Öğretmenlerin fonksiyon kavramı ve öğretimine ilişkin pedagojik görüşleri]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 697–723.
  7. Bayazıt, İ. & Aksoy, Y. (2013). Concept of Function: epistemology, perception types and mental development [Fonksiyon kavramı: epistemolojisi, algı türleri ve zihinsel gelişimi]. Erciyes University Journal of Institute of Science and Technology, 29(1),1–9. http://fbe.erciyes.edu.tr/
  8. Butgel-Tunalı, S., Gözü, Ö., & Özen, G. (2016). Using qualitative and quantitative research methods together “mixed research method” [Nitel ve nicel araştırma yöntemlerinin bir arada kullanılması “karma araştırma yöntemi”] Online Journal of the Faculty of Communication Sciences, 24(2), 106–112.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Manual of Data Analysis for Social Sciences [Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı]. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Yayıncılık. Cantürk-Günhan, B. (2006). An investigation on applicability of problem-based learning in the mathematics lesson at the second stage in the elementary education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  11. Clement, L. (2001). What do student really know about functions. The Mathematics Teacher, 94(9), 745. Creswell, J. W. & Clark, P. (2015) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications (3). Çağır