SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

TETRAHEDRON CYBER DIPL TO IMPROVE TEACHING, LEARNING AND DIGITAL EQUITY IN THE INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE

Messaoud ABBAOUI
Boualem MEFOUED
Ali RAHMANE
Journal
IOJET
Pages
30–46
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to knowledge types: know-how (Kh),knowledge practice (Kp), and theoretical knowledge, learned or scientific knowledge (Tk),tetrahedron Cyber DiPL includes Cyber DiPL to do, Cyber DiPL to practice, and Cyber DiPLto differentiate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is a research based on asking students questions and the conceptual frameworkdeveloped by Houssaye (2000).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The integration of a fourth pole into the Houssaye’spedagogical triangle (2000), as well as the survey carried out with 322 students, allowed us todevelop a tetrahedron designed to improve teaching, learning, and digital equity in theinstitute of architecture, Ferhat Abbas University Setif 1 (Algeria).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to knowledge types: know-how (Kh),knowledge practice (Kp), and theoretical knowledge, learned or scientific knowledge (Tk),tetrahedron Cyber DiPL includes Cyber DiPL to do, Cyber DiPL to practice, and Cyber DiPLto differentiate.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is a research based on asking students questions and the conceptual frameworkdeveloped by Houssaye (2000). The integration of a fourth pole into the Houssaye’spedagogical triangle (2000), as well as the survey carried out with 322 students, allowed us todevelop a tetrahedron designed to improve teaching, learning, and digital equity in theinstitute of architecture, Ferhat Abbas University Setif 1 (Algeria). The tetrahedron is calledtetrahedron Cyber DiPL with Di for Didactic, P for Pedagogy, L for Learning. The pole, as adevice cyber including digital inclusion, is an opportunity to use Information andCommunication Technologies (ICTs). According to knowledge types: know-how (Kh),knowledge practice (Kp), and theoretical knowledge, learned or scientific knowledge (Tk),tetrahedron Cyber DiPL includes Cyber DiPL to do, Cyber DiPL to practice, and Cyber DiPLto differentiate.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABBAOUI, M., MEFOUED, B., RAHMANE, A. (2022). TETRAHEDRON CYBER DIPL TO IMPROVE TEACHING, LEARNING AND DIGITAL EQUITY IN THE INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 30–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/542263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adams Becker, S., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V. & Pomerantz, J. (2018). Horizon report 2018 higher education. Edition EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184633
  2. Ailincai, R. (2010). Interactions éducatives en contexte plurilingue et multiculturel. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, CMLF, Didactique et enseignement français langue maternelle, français langue seconde, edited by Neveu F., Muni Toke V., Durand J., Klingler T., Mondada L., Prévost S. Institut de Linguistique Française Akarowhe., K. (2017). Information communication technology (ICT) in the rducational system of the third world countries as a pivotal to meet global best practice in teaching and development. American Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology. 5 (2:10). Alava, S. (2000). Cyberespace and open training: Towards a change in training practices? Brussels: De Boeck University. Algeria Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). (2016). Report 2000-2015. Prepared by Algerian government. Retrieved from File:///C:/Users/Service%20Info/Downloads/Documents/MAE_Rapport_2000- 2015_BD%20FF_2.pdf Al-Qirim, N., Mesmari, A., Mazroeei, K., Khatri, S. & Kaabi, Z. (2017). Pedagogy and interactive white board technology integration in higher education institutions: Computer-based teaching scenario protoypes. Education and Information Technologies, 22 (1), 355-368.
  3. Altet, M. (1997). Les pédagogies de l’apprentissage. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Castañeda, L. & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 22. Retrieved from https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
  4. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L & Teo, Y.H. (2018). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57 (2), 360-384.
  5. Champagne, M. (2014). The Survey Playbook: Volume 1: How to create the perfect survey. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Clarke, A. (2018). Designing computer-based learning materials. New York, NY 10017, USA: Routledge. Davis, T., Fuller, M., Jackson, S., Pittman & J., Sweet, J. (2007). A national consideration of digital equity. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education, 28. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED49