Journals / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

FOR WHAT PURPOSE DO THE STUDENT TEACHERS USE DGS? A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE CASE OF CONTINUITY

Journal
IOJET
Pages
785–801
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper also shows the potential misconceptions of the STs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although numerous studies have investigated how technology affects academicachievement, very few have focused on the purpose of the use of technology in mathematicseducation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This current study examines how student teachers (STs) benefit from GeoGebra asone of the Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) while solving continuity problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper also shows the potential misconceptions of the STs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although numerous studies have investigated how technology affects academicachievement, very few have focused on the purpose of the use of technology in mathematicseducation. This current study examines how student teachers (STs) benefit from GeoGebra asone of the Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) while solving continuity problems. In orderto have deeper insights and a better understanding of the intended purposes, a case studyresearch design was adopted for this study. Participants in the study were seven mathematicsSTs. Six open-ended problems were used to collect data. Three themes were found to berelevant for understanding how STs use DGS in a problem solving process: visualize, verify,and calculate. The paper also shows the potential misconceptions of the STs.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜLBÜL, B. Ö., GÜVEN, B., GÜLER, M., GÜRSOY, K. (2022). FOR WHAT PURPOSE DO THE STUDENT TEACHERS USE DGS? A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE CASE OF CONTINUITY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 785–801. https://ajindex.com/articles/542236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Açıkgül, K., & Aslaner, R. (2015). Investigation of TPACK confidence perception of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 17(1), 118-152.
  2. Açıkyıldız, G. (2013). Mathematics candidate teachers’ understanding of derivative concept and their mistakes (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. Alqahtani, M. M., & Powell, A. B. (2016). Instrumental appropriation of a collaborative, dynamic-geometry environment and geometrical understanding. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), 72-83.
  3. Aydın, M. & Köğce, D. (2008). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of “equation and function” conceptions. Yüzüncü Yıl University Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 46-58.
  4. Baki, A. (2002). Öğrenen ve öğretenler için bilgisayar destekli matematik. Trabzon: Ceren Yayın Dağıtım. Baki, A. (2006). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi [Mathematics education from theory to practice]. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi.
  5. Barrera-Mora, F. & Reyes-Rodrigues, A. (2013). Cognitive processes developed by students when solving mathematical problems within technological environments. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 109-136.
  6. Baştürk, S., & Dönmez, G. (2011). Investigating mathematics student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the context of knowledge of assessment. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 17-37.
  7. Beery, S. K. (1975). The effect of teaching continuity via open intervals and of approaching the limit of a function as a generalization of continutiy. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, The Florida State University. Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4), 487-500.
  8. Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2007). Using dynamic geometry to introduce calculus concepts: CalGeo and the case of derivative. In Proceedings of the Conference of the British Society for Research into the Learning of Mathematics. (pp. 7-12).
  9. Sheffield, UK, BSLRM. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 247-285.
  10. Bridgers, L. C. (2007). Conceptions of continuity: an investigation of high school calculus teachers and their students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Hamilton College. Camargo, L., Samper, C., & Perry, P. (2007)