Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS

Journal
IOJET
Pages
564–587
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results also revealed that the most commonly used data collecting instruments were achievement tests, questionnaires and scales; the most commonly preferred sample groups were university students; and the most commonly utilized research design was the quantitative method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study, which was based on qualitative research design, aimed to examine the research trends and results of bibliometric mapping analyses of articles about the Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) in education in the past ten years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 126 articles published with the keywords; flipped classroom, education, social science, science, chemistry, biology, and physicsbetween the years of 2010- 2019 were accessed through the Web of Science database.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results also revealed that the most commonly used data collecting instruments were achievement tests, questionnaires and scales; the most commonly preferred sample groups were university students; and the most commonly utilized research design was the quantitative method.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010- 2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study, which was based on qualitative research design, aimed to examine the research trends and results of bibliometric mapping analyses of articles about the Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) in education in the past ten years. For this purpose, 126 articles published with the keywords; flipped classroom, education, social science, science, chemistry, biology, and physicsbetween the years of 2010- 2019 were accessed through the Web of Science database. Out of these 126 articles, 63 were selected using criterion sampling model for the bibliometric and the content analysis. As a result of the bibliometric analysis, it was seen that the most frequently mentioned keywords were flipped classroom, active learning, and chemical education with many of them focusing more on “motivation”. The result of the content analysis showed that the variables included not only “motivation” and “perception” but also “academic achievement/performance” as the most common topics in the studies. The results also revealed that the most commonly used data collecting instruments were achievement tests, questionnaires and scales; the most commonly preferred sample groups were university students; and the most commonly utilized research design was the quantitative method.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKE, D., GÜLER, M., MERAL, E., NAMLI, Z. B. (2022). GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 564–587. https://ajindex.com/articles/542173

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aidinopoulou, V., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom model in primary school history teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237-247.
  2. Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345.
  3. Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2019). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-35.
  4. AlJarrah, A., Thomas, M. K., & Shehab, M. (2018). Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1. Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
  5. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day: International society for technology in education. Bicen, H., & Beheshti, M. (2019). Assessing perceptions and evaluating achievements of ESL students with the usage of infographics in a flipped classroom learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-29.
  6. Blackburn, R. A. (2018). Write my next lecture: Prelecture problem classes and in-lecture discussion to assist case-study teaching of synthesis. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 104-107.
  7. Capone, R., Del Sorbo, M. R., & Fiore, O. (2017). A flipped experience in physics education using CLIL methodology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6579-6582.
  8. Chang, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239.
  9. Chen, C.-K., Huang, N.-T. N., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019). Findings and implications of flipped science learning research: A review of journal publications. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.
  10. Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta‐analysis. Medical education, 52(9), 910-924.
  11. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
  12. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P.