SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF AND ENGAGEMENT IN REACTIVE ONLINEEDUCATION PROVIDED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Mehmet KANIK
Journal
IOJET
Pages
1063–1082
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Forty-six college students responded to the survey and the results indicate that students had an overall negative perception of their experience in online education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic was school closures, which was also the case in North Cyprus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, they demonstrated high engagement with online education and had higher academic achievement in the semester when education moved online than the previous semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Forty-six college students responded to the survey and the results indicate that students had an overall negative perception of their experience in online education.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic was school closures, which was also the case in North Cyprus. As a response to school closures, universities switched to online education. This study aims to investigate students' perception of and engagement in this reactive online education provided during the pandemic. To investigate the issue, an online survey was used. Forty-six college students responded to the survey and the results indicate that students had an overall negative perception of their experience in online education. However, they demonstrated high engagement with online education and had higher academic achievement in the semester when education moved online than the previous semester. Results have implications for future online course offerings during moments of crisis in considering possible factors that contribute to positive attitude, motivation, engagement, and academic achievement.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANIK, M. (2022). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF AND ENGAGEMENT IN REACTIVE ONLINEEDUCATION PROVIDED DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1063–1082. https://ajindex.com/articles/542154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 15-44). Edmonton: AU Press.
  2. Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 45-74). Edmonton: AU Press.
  3. Applefield, J., Huber, R., & Moallem, M. (2000). Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding. The High School Journal, 84(2), 35-53. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40364404
  4. Astani, M., Ready, K. J., & Duplaga, E. A. (2010). Online course experience matters: Investigating students’ perceptions of online learning. Issues in Information Systems, 11(2), 14-21.
  5. Bennett, S., Marsh, D. & Killen, C. (2007). Handbook of online education. London: Continuum Books. Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006 Coates, H. (2005) The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25-36. doi:10.1080/13538320500074915 Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Davidson, K. (2016). Comparing university student performance in online v. face-to-face offerings of the same course, and investigating student perceptions of satisfaction in an online course. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1046. Retrieved from https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1046
  6. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship and Learning, 10(2), 1-13.
  7. Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.561 Ellis, R. (1991, April). The interaction hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Paper presented at The Regional Language Centre Seminar, Singapore. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338037.pdf
  8. El Mansour, B., & Mupinga, D. M. (2007). Students' positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes. College Student Journal, 41(1), 242-248.
  9. Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfact