SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

TEACHERS' PERCEPTIONS OF READINESS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT IN THEIR SCHOOLS

İsmail Karsantı
Journal
IOJET
Pages
261–287
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a consequence, it was recommended thatschooladministrators develop themselves in terms of thosematters

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of thestudy was to describe teachers’ readiness for change and teachers’ perceptions ofinnovation management in their schools as well as to analyze the relationship between them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were composed of 104 primary school teachers who were selected usingconvenient sampling method in Zeytinburnu district of Istanbulin 2019-2020 schoolyear.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a consequence, it was recommended thatschooladministrators develop themselves in terms of thosematters
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of thestudy was to describe teachers’ readiness for change and teachers’ perceptions ofinnovation management in their schools as well as to analyze the relationship between them. The study adopted survey model of the descriptive research design. The participants were composed of 104 primary school teachers who were selected usingconvenient sampling method in Zeytinburnu district of Istanbulin 2019-2020 schoolyear. The data were collected via ‘Readiness for Change Scale’ developed by Kondakçı, Zayim and Çalışkan (2013),and ‘Scale for Innovation Management at School’ developed by Bülbül (2012). In the analysis of the obtained data,quantitative data analysis techniqueswere utilized. The results revealed that the participantteachers’ perceptions of readiness for innovation in terms of the functioning of change and innovation process were positive, and these perceptions of readiness were depended on school administrators’ abilities of innovationmanagement. As a consequence, it was recommended thatschooladministrators develop themselves in terms of thosematters

🔖

Cite This Article

Karsantı, İ. (2022). TEACHERS' PERCEPTIONS OF READINESS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT IN THEIR SCHOOLS. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 261–287. https://ajindex.com/articles/542150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adair, J. E. (2008).The best of John Adair on leadership and management. Thorogood Publishing. Adams, J. D. & Spencer, S. A. (1988). People in transition.Training & Development Journal,42(10), 61-64. https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA7037253&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00410861&p=AONE&sw=w
  2. Adams, R., Bessant, J. & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review.International Journal of Management Reviews,8(1), 21-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x
  3. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G. & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600601
  4. Aslan, M., Beycioğlu, K. & Konan, N. (2008). Principals’ openness to change in Malatya, Turkey. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 12(8), 1-14. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.958.5740&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  5. Awamleh, N. I. A. (1994). Managerial innovation in the civil service in Jordan: A field study.Journal of Management Development,13(9), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719410072099
  6. Bayrakçı, M. & Eraslan, F. (2014). Ortaöğretim okul yöneticilerinin inovasyon yeterlilikleri. [Innovation competence of high school administrators].Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty -SUJEF, 28, 96-135. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/115886
  7. Bouckenooghe, D. & Devos, G. (2007). Psychological change climate as a catalyst of readiness for change: A dominance analysis (Report No. 07/483). Ghent University,Ghent, Belgium. Boydak-Ozan, M. & Karabatak, S. (2013). Ortaöğretim okul yöneticilerinin yenilik yönetimine yaklaşımları ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar. [Secondary school administrators' approaches to innovation management and encountered problems]. International Online Journal ofEducational Sciences, 5(1), 258-273. https://iojes.net/?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=&makaleurl=IOJES_940.pdf&key=41163
  8. Buganza, T., Chiaroni, D., Colombo, G. A.& Frattini, F. (2011). Organisational implications of open innovation: An analysis of inter‐industry patterns. International Journal of Innovation Management,15, 423–455. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003210
  9. Bülbül, T. (2012). Okullarda yenilik yönetimi ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Developing a scale for innovation management at schools: A study of validity and reliability]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 157-175. https://toad.