SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF USING WEB 2.0s IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ARE

Vildan DONMUŞ KAYA
Journal
IOJET
Pages
194–216
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis of bibliometric mapping, it was concluded that the most effective countries in Web 2.0s in the educational research area are the USA, England, and Spain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of present study is to reveal the tendency towards Web 2.0s in the educational research area with the analysis of bibliometric mapping.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As of July 5th 2021, the 786 studies have been retrieved from in the Web of Science database, and are included in the analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis of bibliometric mapping, it was concluded that the most effective countries in Web 2.0s in the educational research area are the USA, England, and Spain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of present study is to reveal the tendency towards Web 2.0s in the educational research area with the analysis of bibliometric mapping. As of July 5th 2021, the 786 studies have been retrieved from in the Web of Science database, and are included in the analysis. VOSviewer was used for the analysis of bibliometric mapping. As a result of the analysis of bibliometric mapping, it was concluded that the most effective countries in Web 2.0s in the educational research area are the USA, England, and Spain. According to the keyword co-occurrence analysis, technology, social media, collaborative learning, e-learning, and higher education keywords stand out on Web 2.0s in the educational research area. It was found that Timothy J. Newby is the most productive researcher. It can be concluded that the most effective researches are higher education researches. According to the analyses conducted in the context of journals, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology”, “Interactive Learning Environments”, and “Internet and Higher Education” were the most contributing journals.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, V. D. (2022). A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF USING WEB 2.0s IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ARE. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 194–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/542144

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
  2. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
  3. Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2016). Research trends in social network sites’ educational use: A review of publications in all SSCI journals to 2015. Review of Education, 4(3), 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3075
  4. Amoozegar, A., Khodabandelou, R., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2018). Major trends in distance education research: A combination of bibliometric and thematic analyze. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 5(2), 5352-5359.
  5. Anastasiades, P. S., & Kotsidis, K. (2013). The Challenges of Web 2.0 for education in Greece: A review of the literature. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 8(4), 19-33.
  6. Barak, M., Herscoviz, O., Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). MOSAICA: A web-2.0 based system for the preservation and presentation of cultural heritage. Computers & Education, 53(3), 841-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.004
  7. Bozkurt, A. 2020. Educational Technology Research Patterns in the Realm of the Digital Knowledge Age. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.570
  8. Byrne, R. (2009). The effect of Web 2.0 on teaching and learning. Teacher Librarian, 37(2), 50-53.
  9. Chen, X., Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2020). Fifty years of British Journal of Educational Technology: A topic modeling based bibliometric perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 692-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12907
  10. Chitanana, L. (2020). The role of Web 2.0 in collaborative design: An ANT perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09578-x
  11. Ciampa, M., & Revels, M. (2012). Student access to online interaction technologies: The impact on grade delta variance and student satisfaction. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 9(6), 31-42.
  12. Clarke, L. W., & Kinne, L. (2012). More than words: Investigating the format of asynchronous discussions as threaded discussions or blogs. Journa