Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

EVALUATING PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ WRITTEN AND ORAL ARGUMENTS ON ECOLOGY

Journal
IOJET
Pages
343–360
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be concluded that oral classroom discussions are more effective than written activities in creating arguments about the ecology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to evaluate prospective elementary school teachers’ skills in creating written and oral arguments about the ecology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 38 prospective elementary school teachers studying in the third year of an elementary teaching undergraduate program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be concluded that oral classroom discussions are more effective than written activities in creating arguments about the ecology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate prospective elementary school teachers’ skills in creating written and oral arguments about the ecology. The case study method, one of the qualitative research approaches, was used. The study group consisted of 38 prospective elementary school teachers studying in the third year of an elementary teaching undergraduate program. As data collection tools, an expressions table containing ecology topics was designed by the researchers to evaluate the written argument creation skills of the participants and audio recordings of discussions were used to determine their oral argument creation skills. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data obtained in these ways. According to the findings of this research, the written and oral arguments of these prospective elementary school teachers were concentrated at a moderate level, but their oral arguments were at a higher level than their written arguments. It can be concluded that oral classroom discussions are more effective than written activities in creating arguments about the ecology.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, B., OKUMUŞ, S. (2022). EVALUATING PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ WRITTEN AND ORAL ARGUMENTS ON ECOLOGY. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 343–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/542120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154d
  2. Balgopal, M.M., Wallace, A.M. & Dahlberg, S. (2017). Writing from different cultural contexts: how college students frame an environmental SSI through written arguments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 195–218.
  3. Berland, L.K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 68–94.
  4. Berland, L.K., & McNeill, K.L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793.
  5. Chang Rundgren, S.N., & Rundgren, C.J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-24.
  6. Chen, Y.C., Hand, B., & Park, S. (2016). Examining elementary students’ development of oral and written argumentation practices through argument-based inquiry. Sci & Educ, 25, 277–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9811-0
  7. Chin, C.C., Yang, W.C., & Tuan, H.L. (2016). Argumentation in a socioscientific context and its influence on fundamental and derived science literacies. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 603–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9606-1
  8. Choi, A., Hand, B., & Greenbowe, T. (2013). Students’ written arguments in general chemistry laboratory investigations. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1763–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9330-1
  9. Choi, A., Klein, V., & Hershberger, S. (2015). Success, difficulty, and instructional strategy to enact an argument-based inquiry approach: experiences of elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 991-1011.
  10. Çetin, P.S., Doğan, N., & Kutluca, A.Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation: influence of content knowledge. J Sci Teacher Educ, 25, 309–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9378-z
  11. Deveci, A. (2009). Developing seventh grade middle school students’ socioscientific argumentation, level of knowledge and cognitive thinking skills in the structure of matter subject (Master thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(