Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF THE NEW PARADIGM IN EFL USING SYSTEMS APPROACH: A MIXED METHOD DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAM EVALUATION STUDY

Journal
IOJET
Pages
690–712
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that there are many issues that need to be considered for distance education implementations and pedagogy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although some education institutions have implemented open or online education in line with their own needs so far, distance education did not have national recognition until the pandemic that swept the world at the beginning of 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Five English language instructors and 403 English preparatory department students, five of whom were also interviewed, participated in this study. ‘Distance Education System Evaluation Scale (DESES)’, semi-structured interviews, observational journals and institutional documents were used as data collection tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that there are many issues that need to be considered for distance education implementations and pedagogy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although some education institutions have implemented open or online education in line with their own needs so far, distance education did not have national recognition until the pandemic that swept the world at the beginning of 2020. After this date, many institutions underwent transformation from conventional face-to-face education to distance or online education, and they had to change their programs accordingly. For this reason, this simultaneous explanatory mixed method study was conducted to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of distance education program of an English language institution situated in the northern part of Turkey. Five English language instructors and 403 English preparatory department students, five of whom were also interviewed, participated in this study. ‘Distance Education System Evaluation Scale (DESES)’, semi-structured interviews, observational journals and institutional documents were used as data collection tools. The results of quantitative data showed that students were mostly satisfied with instructors and least satisfied with the content of the program. Moreover, it is found out that students with higher grades gave high scores to DESES. On the other hand, from the results of qualitative data, while it is understood that the program was criticized negatively in terms of socialization, technical problems, teacher’s mood, pacing schedule, registration, attendance, feedback, assessment, language skills and distance education pedagogy; positive themes emerged as time and expenses, technical infrastructure, instructors and psychological factors. The results show that there are many issues that need to be considered for distance education implementations and pedagogy.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUTLU, H. T., İPEK, Ö. F. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF THE NEW PARADIGM IN EFL USING SYSTEMS APPROACH: A MIXED METHOD DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAM EVALUATION STUDY. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 690–712. https://ajindex.com/articles/542118

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aljumah, F. H. (2020). The Impact of the EFL Undergraduate Students' Integration in Distance Learning with its Various Platforms. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.1), 298-317.
  2. Amiryousefi, M., & Geld, R. (2021). The role of redressing teachers’ instructional feedback interventions in EFL learners’ motivation and achievement in distance education. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 13-25.
  3. Amiri, M., & Maftoon, P. (2010). A critical look at distance education in Elt. in Edulearn 10 Proceedings (pp. 6792-6799).
  4. IATED. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems’ success. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58-70.
  5. Boehler, T. (1999). A design plan for online distance learning program delivery. Doctoral Dissertation. Pepperdine University. Bozkurt, A.; Sharma, R.C. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Corona Virus pandemic. Asian Journak of Distance Education. 2020, 15, i–vi. Available online: https://www.asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447 (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  6. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Chan, V. (2001). Determining students’ language needs in a tertiary setting. English Teaching Forum July, 39(3), 16-27.
  7. Coskun, A., & Daloglu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English language teacher education program through Peacock's model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 35(6), 24- 42. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209(240), 209-240.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Debes, G. (2021). Distance Learning in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Advantages and Disadvantages. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1109-1118.
  9. Derakhshan, A. (2021). Emergence Distance Education (EDE) role in the Learning of English Language Skills during COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 40(3), 41-82.
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications. Do Le, T., & Tran, T. N. T. (2021). English Language Training Curriculum: An Evaluation From Learner’s Perceptions. Open Journal of Social