SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

SELF-REGULATION OF NOVICE MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHERS IN THE PREPARATION PROCESS FOR TEACHING

Pınar YILDIZ
Ramazan GÜREL
İ. Elif YETKİN ÖZDEMİR
Erhan BOZKURT
Journal
IOJET
Pages
449–470
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also found that they do not set clear goals and develop detailed planning in regard to teaching activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyses the self-regulation (goal setting and planning) of the novice middle school mathematics teachers during the preparation phase of teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study is designed as a case study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also found that they do not set clear goals and develop detailed planning in regard to teaching activities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study analyses the self-regulation (goal setting and planning) of the novice middle school mathematics teachers during the preparation phase of teaching. The study is designed as a case study. The participants are six mathematics teachers with less than five-year teaching experience. The data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. In regard to the observations, the teaching of certain topics (e.g., basic elements of prisms) were observed to uncover the classroom behavior of the participants. In the semistructured interviews carried out after the class observations, the participants were asked some questions about their goals and planning concerning the related teaching activities. The findings of the study indicate that the participants do not exhibit the goal setting and planning activities that are consistent with the conceptual learning covered in the mathematics education program. It is also found that they do not set clear goals and develop detailed planning in regard to teaching activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, P., GÜREL, R., ÖZDEMİR, İ. E. Y., BOZKURT, E. (2022). SELF-REGULATION OF NOVICE MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHERS IN THE PREPARATION PROCESS FOR TEACHING. IOJET, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 449–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/542093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). "Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194-222.
  2. Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498.
  3. Bozkurt, E. (2015). Ders araştırması modeli bağlamında ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin öğretim faaliyetlerine yönelik grup temelli öz-düzenlemelerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of middle-school mathematics teachers’ group-based self-regulation of instructional activities in the context of the lesson study model] [Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hacettepe]. Ankara,
  4. Turkey. Brown, D. S. (1993). Descriptions of two novice secondary teachers' planning, Curriculum Inquiry, 23(1), 63-84.
  5. Clark, C. (1978). "Teacher planning study, described", Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 4. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage. Çapa-Aydın, Y., Sungur, S., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2009). Teacher self-regulation: Examining a multidimensional construct. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 345-356.
  6. Çapa-Aydın, Y., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakçı, E. (2014). Öğretmen özdüzenlemesi [Teacher self-regulation]. In G. Sakız (Ed.), Öz-düzenleme: Öğrenmeden öğretime öz-düzenleme davranışlarının gelişimi, stratejiler ve öneriler [Self-regulation: The development, strategies, and recommendations of self-regulating behaviors in learning and teaching] (pp. 218-230).
  7. Nobel. Davidson, A. (2016). The Priorities and Challenges of Primary Teachers' Knowledge in Their Mathematics Planning. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Fantilli, R. D., & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 814-825.
  8. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson Study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Grundén, H. (2020). Planning in mathematics teaching–a varied, emotional process influenced by others. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 67-88.
  9. Hall, T. J., & Smith, M. A. 2006. Teacher planning, instruction and reflection: What we know about teacher cognitive processes. Quest, 58(4), 424-442