Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 126 - Sayı: 126

TERTIARY GEOLOGY OF GÖKÇEADA AND BOZCAADA (ÇANAKKALE), TURKEY

Pages
49–49
Publication Date
2003-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, tectonic features can be seen in the seismic sections from the offshore areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Karaağaç formation which is made up of mainly sandstone lithology and presented by the regresive features toward up in the Gökçeada and Fıçıtepe formation which consist of red continental conglomerates are Early Eocene in age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Approximately 1000 m Thick Pliocene sediments (Ergene formation) were determinal in the offshore sedimentary basins by the seismic and drilling data, however they do not encountered in the field exposures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, tectonic features can be seen in the seismic sections from the offshore areas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Karaağaç formation which is made up of mainly sandstone lithology and presented by the regresive features toward up in the Gökçeada and Fıçıtepe formation which consist of red continental conglomerates are Early Eocene in age. Middle Eocene carbonates of the Soğucak formation including numerous Nummulites overlie Early Eocene units unconformably. Soğucak formation is presented as lens with no lateral continuation in the field. Sedimentation continued with the shale deposition of the Ceylan formation and left its place to the shore face facies of the Mezardere and Osmancık formations with the beginning of the regression in the Early Oligocene. Continental Danişmen formation overlies all these units. Volcanic activity (Hisarlıdağ-Ayvacık volcanics) continued intensly during Early-Middle Eocene in the region. Depositional systems which were formed under tectonic control in the Late Miocene continued to be develop until the beginning of the Early Pliocene. This is turn provided Gazhanedere, Kirazli and Alçıtepe formations to be deposited. Approximately 1000 m Thick Pliocene sediments (Ergene formation) were determinal in the offshore sedimentary basins by the seismic and drilling data, however they do not encountered in the field exposures. Facies were seperated according to their depositional difference. There are four main depositional periods in the islands. These are Early Eocene, Middle Eocene-Late Oligocene, Late Miocene-Pliocene and Pliocene- Present depositional periods. The most important tectonic feature in the islands is the Ganos fault which is a western extention of the Late Miocene NAF. This fault borders the northern part of the Gökçeada island. Lateral components of the Ganos fault in the southern parts provided sedimentary basins to be developed in the Late Miocene-Pliocene. There is no tectonic data from the Early Miocene time in the islands. However, tectonic features can be seen in the seismic sections from the offshore areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESGİN, Y., VAROL, B. (2003). TERTIARY GEOLOGY OF GÖKÇEADA AND BOZCAADA (ÇANAKKALE), TURKEY. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 126 - Sayı: 126, 49–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/54182

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akartuna, M.,1950, imroz adasında bazı jeolojik müşahadeler: Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bült., 2, 9-17.
  2. Ailen, J.R.L., 1970, Sediments of the modern Nıger delta, a summary and review: in Society of Economic Paleontologist and Mineralogists, special publication, 15, 198-151.
  3. Berg, O.R., 1982, Seismic detection and evoluation of delta and turbudite seguences: application to explaration for the subtle trap: AAPG Bul- letin, v66, 1271-1288.
  4. Coşkun, B., 2000, North Anatolian Fault-Saros Gulf relationships and their relevance to hydrocarbon exploration, northern Aegean Sea, Turkey: Marine and Petroleum Geology, 17, 751-772.
  5. Ercan, T.; Satır, M.; Steinitz, G.; Dora, A.; Sarfakıoğ- lu, E.; Adis, C.; Walter, H.J. ve Yıldırım T.,1995,
  6. Biga Yarımadası ve Gökçeada, Bozcada ve Tavşan adalarındaki (KB Anadolu) Tersiyer volkanizmasının özellik- leri: MTADerg., 117, 55-86.
  7. Erguvanlı, K., 1955, Etüde geologigue de l'ile de Bozcaada: Bull. Geol. Soc. France, (6), 5, 399-401.; 1957, Outline of geology of the Dardanelles: Geol. Mag., 94,47-53.
  8. Georgakopulos, A., 1992, History, status and future considerations of hydrocarbon exploration in Greece: First Break Vol: 10, No: 11, 413- 416. Haq, B.Y., 1991, Sequence stratigraphy, sea level change, and significance for the deep sea, in Mac Donald D.l.M. ed., Sedimentation, tectonics and eustasy; sea level changes at active margins: International Association of Sedimantologist, special publications, 12, 3-39.
  9. Holmes, A.W., 1961, A stratigrapfic review of Thrace: TPAO Arşiv No; 368. Karacık, Z., 1995, Ezine-Ayvacık (Çanakkale) dola- yında genç volkanizma plutonizma ilişkileri: İTÜ Fen Bil. Ens. Doktora Tezi 342 s, (Yayımlanmamış). Kasar, S.; Burkan, K.A.; Siyako, M. ve Demir, O., 1983, Tekirdağ-Şarköy-Keşan-Enez böl- gesinin jeolojisi ve Hidrokarbon olanakları: TPAO rap., 1171 (Yayımlanmamış). Kesgin, Y., 2002, Kuzeydoğu Ege kıyı ve deniz alan- larının Tersiyer Jeolojisi ve Sedimantolojisi, Ankara Üniv. Fen Bil. Ens. Doktora Tezi, 265 s. (Yayımlanmamış). Mutti, E. ve Ricci Lucehi, F., 1975, Turbidite facies and facies associations. In Examples of Tur- bidite Facies Associatons from selected Formations of the Northern Appendies: E. Mutti, G.C.; Parea, F.; Ricci Lucehi, M.: Sag- ri, G.; Zanzushi, G.; Ghibaudo, S.; Jacerino (Eds), Field Trip Guidebook A. 11,22-36, 9. LAS Congress, Nice France. Okay, A.I., 1987, Biga Yarımadasının Batı kesiminin jeolojisi ve Tektoniği: İTÜ Yerbilimleri ve Yer altı Kaynakları UYGAR Merkezi, İstanbul. ve Tüys