A Study on Cotton (Gossypium sp.) Nectar Production in Uzbekistan

Objective & Hypothesis:Given the importance of cotton varieties in beekeeping, we have been able to determine the nectar and honey yield per hectare for several years Cotton nectaries produce highly concentrated carbohydrates, nectarines, amino acids and fatty acids.

📊

Key Findings & Data:In different varieties of cotton, there are 4 types of nectaries (intra-cup, bract, sub-bract, and leaf), and the number and concentration of nectarium are different for all types.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:It is understood from the research results that cotton varieties have high honey and nectar productivity in Uzbekistan environment.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Cotton varieties · Nectar · Nectar Concentration

Abstract

Given the importance of cotton varieties in beekeeping, we have been able to determine the nectar and honey yield per hectare for several years Cotton nectaries produce highly concentrated carbohydrates, nectarines, amino acids and fatty acids. Unlike other types of plants. In different varieties of cotton, there are 4 types of nectaries (intra-cup, bract, sub-bract, and leaf), and the number and concentration of nectarium are different for all types. Nectar productivity of fine fiber varieties is significantly higher than that of medium fiber varieties. Nectar is an important nutrient source for insects and pathogens due to its high sugar content. Several methods of nectar determination were used to determine the number of angles of cotton varieties planted in the country, such as "tube" and "washing." On average, honey yield of these varieties is 50-60 kg per hectare. It is understood from the research results that cotton varieties have high honey and nectar productivity in Uzbekistan environment.

Özet

Given the importance of cotton varieties in beekeeping, we have been able to determine the nectar and honey yield per hectare for several years Cotton nectaries produce highly concentrated carbohydrates, nectarines, amino acids and fatty acids. Unlike other types of plants. In different varieties of cotton, there are 4 types of nectaries (intra-cup, bract, sub-bract, and leaf), and the number and concentration of nectarium are different for all types. Nectar productivity of fine fiber varieties is significantly higher than that of medium fiber varieties. Nectar is an important nutrient source for insects and pathogens due to its high sugar content. Several methods of nectar determination were used to determine the number of angles of cotton varieties planted in the country, such as "tube" and "washing." On average, honey yield of these varieties is 50-60 kg per hectare. It is understood from the research results that cotton varieties have high honey and nectar productivity in Uzbekistan environment.

Keywords

Cotton varieties Nectar Nectar Concentration Test Method Washing Method

🔖

Cite This Article

Hamidov, G., Maxsudov, Q., Voxobova, S., Akramova, D. (2022). A Study on Cotton (Gossypium sp.) Nectar Production in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 247–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/541649

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

Layok, V. D. ( 1941). Kulturnıye medonosı Uzbekstana i rol pçelv povışenii ix urojaynosti (Tekst)/pod red. Akad. R.R.Şedreva-Taşkent: Uzgiz. pp. 68. Eskov, E. K. (1992).
Etologiya medonosnoy pçelı. Moskova, Kolos, pp. 336. Hamidov, G. H. (1977) Beekeeping and cotton growing. Tashkent, pp. 132. Kaziev, T. I. (1964). Problems of nectar secretion in cotton and the role of honey bees in increasing its vield. Baku, Azerb. Gos. İzdat. pp. 215. Minkov, S. G. (1957). Nectar productivity of cotton in South-Kazakh region. Pchelovodstvo, 34(12), 35-40.
Radoev, L. (1963). Studies on bee pollination and honey productivity of cotton. In 19th Internatl. Apic. Cong. Proc. Liblise, Czechoglovaciya. pp.99. Bulgakova, L. L. (1978). Medonosnaya rastitelnost pribrejnoy zonı srednogo teçeniya peki Sırdarı. Avtoreferat dis. Kand. Biol. Nauk. Taşkent, pp. 19. Anton, S., Komon, J. E., Denisow, B. (2017). Floral nectary, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in five nocturnal Oenothera species (Onagraceae) in relation to loral visitors. Planta, 246, 1051-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2748-y
Heil, M. (2011). Nectar: Generation, regulation, and ecological functions. Trends in Plant Science, 16, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.01.003
Chalcoff, V. R., Aizen, M. A., & Galetto, L.(2006). Nectar concentration and composition of 26 species from the temperate forest of South America. Annals of Botany, 97, 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj043
Knopper, L. D., Dan, T., Reisig, D. D., Johnson, J. D., & Bowers, L. M. (2016). Sugar concentration in nectar: A quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments. Pest Management Science, 72, 1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps. 4321 Nicolson, S.W. (2007).
Nectar consumers. In S. W. Nicolson, M. Nepi, & E. Pacini (Eds.), Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp. 289–342. ISBN 978-1-4020-5937-7
Gonzalez-Teuber, M., Silva-Bueno, J.C., Heil, M., & Boland, W. (2012). Increased host investment in extrafloral nectar (EFN) improves the efficiency of a mutualistic defensive service. PLoS One, 7, e46598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046598
Hanes, C. S. (1929). An application of the method of Hagedorn and Jensen to the determination of larger quantities of reducing sugars. Biochem J., 23(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0230099
Gilliam, M., Moffet, J. O., Kauffeld N. M. (1983). Examination of floral necta of citrus, cotton, and Arizona desert pl