SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Modern Education Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Music Students' Use of Mobile Applications for Learning Purposes

Sadık ÖZÇELİK
Erkan DEMİRTAŞ
Pages
299–325
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research: It was found that the mobile application usage levels of the music education students were moderate, mobile application usage levels changed according to gender but did not change according to grade level, musical instrument type, and operating system used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper analyzes the use of mobile applications for learning purposes by music education department students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the validity and reliability studies were carried out, the scale was applied to 505 music education students from 5 universities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research: It was found that the mobile application usage levels of the music education students were moderate, mobile application usage levels changed according to gender but did not change according to grade level, musical instrument type, and operating system used.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper analyzes the use of mobile applications for learning purposes by music education department students. The survey design was used as the research method. The Mobile Application Usage in Music Learning scale developed by the researcher was used as a data collection tool. After the validity and reliability studies were carried out, the scale was applied to 505 music education students from 5 universities. As a result of the research: It was found that the mobile application usage levels of the music education students were moderate, mobile application usage levels changed according to gender but did not change according to grade level, musical instrument type, and operating system used. At the end of the research, suggestions were made about the participant groups, the use of the scale, and mobile applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELİK, S., DEMİRTAŞ, E. (2022). Music Students' Use of Mobile Applications for Learning Purposes. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 299–325. https://ajindex.com/articles/541434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & van Keulen, H. (2015). Students attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9268-x
  2. Ayhan, A., & Ertekin, B. (2017). Notasyon videoları yoluyla solfej eğitimi çalışmaları üzerine bir değerlendirme: Muzikolaj örneği [An evaluation on solfeggio training studies through notation videos: An example of musicolage]. In A. Bakla, H. Demiröz, & A. Çekiç (Eds.), Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu (pp. 25–38).
  3. Cumhuriyet University. Bannerman, J. K., & O’Leary, E. J. (2020). Digital natives unplugged: Challenging assumptions of preservice music educators’ technological skills. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 1– 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083720951462
  4. Bauer, W., & Dammers, R. (2016). Technology in music teacher education: A national survey. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 18(1), 2–15. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/fmea/rpme/2016/00000018/00000001/art0000 1 Bayyurt, Y., Erçetin, G., & Karataş, N. B. (2014). The stages in mobile-assisted language learning material development. In M. Kalz, Y. Bayyurt, & M. Specht (Eds.), Mobile as Mainstream – Towards Future Challenges in Mobile Learning (pp. 339–351). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13416-1
  5. Birch, H. J. S. (2017). Potential of SoundCloud for mobile learning in music education: A pilot study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.080895
  6. Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM -Mathematics Education, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
  7. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2005). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13. Routledge. Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2016). Conceptualising authentic mobile learning. In D. Churchill, J. Lu, T. K. F. Chiu, & B. Fox (Eds.), Mobile Learning Design Theories and Application (pp. 27– 43). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_2
  8. Burton, S. L., & Pearsall, A. (2016). Music-based iPad app preferences of young children. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X16642630
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş.; Çakmak, E. K.; Akgün, Ö. E.; Karadeniz, S.; Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akad