SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Modern Education Studies / 2022 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

An Investigation of Social Acceptance Levels of Students with Typical Development toward Their Peers with Special Needs in terms of Certain Variables

M.abdulbaki Karaca(INONU UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4192-6307
Hasan H. Toprak(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9580-1534
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found out that there was no statistically significant difference between the mother’s level of education of the students with typical development and their social acceptance levels towards their peers with special needs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the level of social acceptance of students with typical development in inclusive classes towards individuals with special needs in terms of certain variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the 2019-2020 academic year, 1083 6th, 7th, and 8th-grade students in inclusive classes in public secondary schools in Türkiye participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found out that there was no statistically significant difference between the mother’s level of education of the students with typical development and their social acceptance levels towards their peers with special needs.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Social acceptance · inclusive education · peer attitude

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the level of social acceptance of students with typical development in inclusive classes towards individuals with special needs in terms of certain variables. In this study, the screening model was used, which is one of the quantitative research methods. The reason for choosing the screening model in the research is to determine the relationship between different variables such as gender, parents' education level, and whether there is a person with disability in the student's immediate environment and the level of social acceptance. In the 2019-2020 academic year, 1083 6th, 7th, and 8th-grade students in inclusive classes in public secondary schools in Türkiye participated in the study. The Social Acceptance Scale was used in the study. The statistical package was used to analyze the data. The results of the study revealed that there was a significant difference in social acceptance levels of students with typical development towards their peers with special needs (p˂0.001) according to the variables as gender, father's education level, grade level, Having a person with disability among relatives, previous attendance to kindergarten and nursery in the past, family status. However, it was found out that there was no statistically significant difference between the mother’s level of education of the students with typical development and their social acceptance levels towards their peers with special needs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaca, M., Toprak, H. H. (2022). An Investigation of Social Acceptance Levels of Students with Typical Development toward Their Peers with Special Needs in terms of Certain Variables. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1413776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (75)

  1. Aktan, O., Budak, Y., & Botabekovna, A. B. (2019). İlkokul Öğrencilerinin Kaynaştırma Öğrencilerine Yönelik Sosyal Kabul Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi: Bir Karma Yöntem Çalışması. [Determination of Social Acceptance Levels of Primary School Students toward Inclusion Students: A Mixed Method Study]. İlköğretim Online, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.632374
  2. Aktaş, C. (2001). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fiziksel özürlü yaşıtlarına yönelik sosyal kabul düzeylerinin geliştirilmesi. [Developing the social acceptance levels of primary school students toward their peers with physical disability]. Master thesis. Publications of the Prime Ministry Administration for People with Disability.
  3. Aktaş, C. & Küçüker S. (2002), Bilişsel-Duyuşsal Odaklı Bir Programın İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Engelli Yaşıtlarına Yönelik Sosyal Kabul Düzeylerinin Etkisinin İncelenmesi, [Investigation of the Effect of a Cognitive-Affective Focused Program on Social Acceptance Levels of Primary School Students on Peers with Physical Disability], Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education.3(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000061
  4. Aral, N. & Dikici, A. (1998). Normal Gelişim Gösteren Çocukların Özel Gereksinimli Olan Akranları Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin incelenmesi. [Examining the Views of Typically Developing Children about their Peers with Special Needs]. VIII. Paper presented at the National Special Education Congress. Edirne
  5. Arslan, E. (2010). Kaynaştırma uygulamalarına katılan engelli öğrencilerin sosyal kabul düzeylerini belirlemeye yönelik ölçek geliştirme çalışması. [A Scale Development Study of Social Acceptance Levels For Students with Disability Who Integrated Primary School] Master Thesis. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Institute of Social Sciences, Burdur.
  6. Avcıoğlu, H. (2017). Classroom teachers’ behavior and peers’ acceptance of students in inclusive classrooms. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2), 463-492. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0034
  7. Ayral, M., Özcan, Ş., Can, R., Ünlü, A., Bedel, H., Şengün, G., Demirhen & Ş., Çağlar, K. (2015). Normal gelişim gösteren öğrencilerin özel gereksinimli öğrencilere bakışını etkileyen etkenler. [Factors affecting the view of students with special needs of students with typical development] Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 15, 218-230.
  8. Ayral, M., Özcan, Ş., Can, R., Ünlü, A., Bedel, H., Şengün, G., & Çağlar, K. (2013). Kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin sosyal kabul düzeyleri. [Social acceptance levels of inclusive students] ELMIS International Special Education Congress,19-21.
  9. Bahar A, Bahar G, Savaş H.A, & Parlar S. (2009). Engelli çocukların annelerinin depresyon ve anksiyete düzeyleri ile stresle başa çıkma tarzlarının belirlenmesi. [Determining the depression and anxiety levels of mothers of children with disability and their coping styles with stress]. Fırat Journal of Health Services; 4,97-112.
  10. Batu, S. (2008). Kaynaştırma ve Destek Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri. [Inclusive and Support Special Education Services] H, Diken (Edt). Özel Eğitim. Pegem Academy Publishing.
  11. Batu, S. & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2006). Kaynaştırma. [Inclusive]. Kök Publishing.
  12. Bishop, J. A., & Inderbitzen, H. M. (1995). Peer acceptance and friendship: An investigation of their relation to self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(4), 476-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431695015004005
  13. Buysse, V., Goldman, B. D., & Skinner, M. L. (2002). Setting effects on friendship formation among young children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 503-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206800406
  14. Chamberlain, B., Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Involvement or isolation? The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0164-4
  15. Chan, S. Y., & Mpofu, E. (2001). Children’s peer status in school settings current and prospective assessment procedures. School Psychology International, 22(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343010221004
  16. Civelek, A. H. (1990). Eğitilebilir Zihinsel Özürlü Çocukların Sosyal Kabul Görmelerinde Normal Çocukların Bilgilendirilmelerinin ve iki Grubun Resim-is ile Beden Eğitimi Derslerinde Bütünleştirilmelerinin Etkileri. [The Effects of Informing Typical Children and Integrating Two Groups in Art and Physical Education Classes on Social Acceptance of Educable Children with Intellectual Disabilities] Doctoral Thesis. Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences.
  17. Çiftçi, İ. (1997). Normal çocukları bilgilendirmenin zihinsel engelli yaşıtlarına yönelik tutumlarına etkisi. [The Effect of Informing Typical Children to Their Attitude Toward Their Peers with Intellectual Disability.] Abant İzzet Baysal University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis.
  18. Dağlı Gökbulut, Ö, Gökbulut B. & Yeniasır, M. (2017). Social Acceptance of Students with Special Needs from Peer Viewpoint. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11),7287-7294. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79592
  19. Ercan, Z. G. (2001). Kaynaştırılmış Ortamdaki Normal Gelişim Gösteren Çocukların 8- 11 Yasları Arasındaki Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Akranlarına Karsı Tutumlarının incelenmesi. [Examination of the attitudes of typically developing children in an integrated environment toward their peers with learning difficulties between the ages of 8-11]. Master Thesis. Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology.
  20. Erefe, İ. (2012). Hemşirelikte Araştırma İlke Süreç ve Yöntemleri. [Research Principles, Processes and Methods in Nursing] Odak Ofset Publishing.
  21. Fırat, T., & Koyuncu, İ. (2019). Lise Öğrencilerinin Özel Gereksinimli Bireylere Yönelik Sosyal Kabul Düzeyleri. [Social Acceptance Levels of High School Pupils Toward Individuals with Special Needs] Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 39(1), 503-525. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.431264
  22. Gali, D. M., Borg, R. W. & Gali, P. J. (1996) Educational Research: An Introduction (6th ed.). Longman
  23. Georgiadi M, Kalyva E, Kourkoutas E. & Tsakiris V. (2012). Young children's attitudes toward peers with intellectual disabilities: effect of the type of school, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25,531-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2012.00699.x
  24. Graham, L. (2020). Inclusive education for the 21st century: Theory, policy and practice. Routledge.
  25. Guralnick, M. J., Neville, B., Hammond, M. A., & Connor, R. T. (2007). The friendships of young children with developmental delays. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.10.004
  26. Guralnick, M. J., Connor, R. T., Neville, B., & Hammond, M. A. (2006). Promoting the peer-related social development of young children with mild developmental delays: Effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 336-356. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[336:PTPSDO]2.0.CO;2
  27. Guralnick, M. J. (2002). Involvement with peers: Comparisons between young children with and without Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00405.x
  28. Hall L.J. & McGregor J.A. (2000) A follow-up study of the peer relationships of children with disabilities in an inclusive school, The Journal of Special Education, 34(3),114-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669000340030
  29. Harper. D. C. (1997). Children's attiludes toward physical disabilitiy in Nepal: A field study. Journal Of Cross Cultural Psychology. 28(6), 710-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197286004
  30. Hogan A., McLellan L. & Bauman A. (2000) Health promotion needs of young people with disabilities & population study. Disability & Rehabilitation, 22, 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800296593
  31. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1988). İnsan ve İnsanlar [Man and People]. 9.Baskı,83-100. Evrim Publishing and Distribution.
  32. Kaner, S. (2000). Ortopedik engelli ve engelli olmayan erkek ergenlerde benlik saygısı ve beden imajı. [Self-Esteem and Body Image in Male Adolescents with Orthopedic Disabilities and Non-Disabled People]. Journal of Special Education. 2(4), 13-22.
  33. Karaca, M. A. (2018). Kaynaştırma eğitimi programının öğretmenlerin kaynaştırma uygulamalarındaki mesleki yeterliliklerine etkisi, [The effect of the inclusive education program on the professional competencies of teachers in inclusive practices], Master thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University.
  34. Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method] (9. Press.). Nobel Publications.
  35. Kargın, T., & Baydık, B. (2002). Kaynaştırma Ortamındaki İşiten Öğrencilerin İşitme Engelli Akranlarına Yönelik Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. [An Investigation of the Attitudes of Hearing Students in an Inclusion Environment toward their Hearing Impaired Peers in Terms of Various Variables] Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 3(02). https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000064
  36. Kılıç, A.F. (2011). The Effectiveness of Informing The Preschool Teachers about Inclusion Of Disabled Students Upon Changing Their Opinions Toward Inclusion Education, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Institute of Social Sciences. Master Thesis
  37. Košir, K. (2013). Socialni odnosi v šoli. Subkulturni azil Maribor.
  38. Koyuncuoğlu, E. (2016). Determination Social Acceptance Level of Disabled Peer by the Students at Primary School Second Degree and Secondary School Institutes, Yıldırım Bayezid University Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis
  39. Krahe, B. & Altwasser, C. (2006). Changing Negative Attitudes Toward Person with Physical Disabilities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 16, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.849
  40. Lee, S. H., Yoo, S. Y., & Bak, S. H. (2003). Characteristics of friendships between children with and without disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 157–166.
  41. Lorger, T., Schmidt, M., & Bakracevic Vukman, K. (2015). The social acceptance of secondary school students with learning disabilities (LD). CEPS Journal, 5(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.148
  42. Metin, N. (1992). Okul öncesi dönemde özel gereksinimli çocuklar için kaynaştırma programları, Özel Eğitim Dergisi, [Inclusion programs for children with special needs in pre-school period, Journal of Special Education] 1(2), 34-36.
  43. Turkish Ministry of National Education (2018) General Directorate of Special Education and Guidance Services Special Education Services Regulation.
  44. Nal, A. & Tüzün, I. (2011). Türkiye’de Kaynaştırma/Bütünleştirme Yoluyla Eğitimin Durumu, [Status of Education through Inclusion/Integration in Türkiye] Policy and Practice Recommendations for Increasing the Efficiency of Inclusion/Integration Project.
  45. Nal, A., & Tüzün, I. (2022). Türkiye’de kaynaştırma/bütünleştirme yoluyla eğitim: politika ve uygulama önerileri. Tohum Türkiye Autism Early Diagnosis and Education Foundation and Education Reform Initiative (ERG).
  46. Nevill R.E., & White S.W. (2011). College students' openness toward autism spectrum disorders: improving peer acceptance, Journal of Autism Development Disorders, 41(12), 1619-1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1189-x
  47. Odluyurt, S. (2018). Activities Oriented to Preparing Children with Disabilities for Preschool Inclusion. İlköğretim Online, 17(2).
  48. Odom, S. L., Zercher, C., Li, S., Marquart, J. M., Sandall, S., & Brown, W. H. (2006). Social acceptance and rejection of preschool children with disabilities: A mixed-method analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 807-823. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.807
  49. Odom, S. L., & Diamond, K. E. (1998). Inclusion of young children with special needs in early childhood education: The research base. Early Childhood Research Ouarlerly, 13(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80023-4
  50. Öncül, N. & S. Batu. (2005). Normal Gelişim Gösteren Çocuk Annelerinin Kaynaştırma Uygulamasına İlişkin Görüşleri, [Views of Mothers of Typically Developing Children on Inclusion Practice], Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 6(2), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000090
  51. Özdemir, Ş., Vatandaş, C., & Torlak, Ö. (2009). Sosyal problemleri çözmede aile yaşam döngüsünün (AYD) önemi. [The Importance of Family Life Cycle (ADD) in Solving Social Problems], Journal of Social Policy Studies,16(16), 7-18.
  52. Özgönenel, S. Ö., & Girli, A. (2016). The examination of an education program to improve peer relationships of the autistic children integrated in classrooms. İlköğretim Online, 15(1).
  53. Özkan-Yaşaran, Ö. (2009). The Effectiveness of Inclusion Preparation Activities on Providing Social Acceptance of Normally Developing Students for Individuals with Exceptionalities, Master Thesis, Anadolu University Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskisehir.
  54. Özkubat, U., Sanır, H., Töret, G., & Babacan, A. (2016). Yetersizlikten etkilenmiş çocukların sosyal kabullerini sağlamada kaynaştırmaya hazırlık etkinliklerinin etkisi. [The effect of preparation activities for inclusion in ensuring the social acceptance of children with disabilities], Gazi Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 211-232.
  55. Peters, S. (2004). Inclusive education: An EFA strategy for all children. World Bank.
  56. Popp R.A., & Fu V.R.(1981). Preschool children's understanding of children with orthopedic disabilities and their expectations, The Journal of Psychology, 107,77-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1981.9915207
  57. Pijl S.J., & Frostad P.(2010). Peer acceptance and self-concept of students with disabilities in regular education, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903450947
  58. Royal, G. P. & Roberts. M.C.(1987). Students perception of and attitudes toward disabilities: A comparison of twenty conditions. Journal of Clinical Child Phychology 16(2), 122- 132. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1602_4
  59. Sarı Y.H., Bektaş M., & Altıparmak S. (2010). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin engellilere yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi, [Determination of nursing students' attitudes toward the disabled], New Medical Journal, 80-83.
  60. Scheepstra, A. J. M., Nakken, H., & Pijl, S. J. (1999). Contacts with classmates: The social position of pupils with Down’s syndrome in Dutch mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education,14,212-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0885625990140303.
  61. Siperstein. G. N. & Bak. J. J. (1985). Effects of social behavior on children's attitudes toward their mildly and moderately mentally retarded peers, American Journal of Menial Deficiency.90(3). 319-327.
  62. Sucuoğlu, B. & Kargın, T. (2006). Kaynaştırma Uygulamaları [Inclusive Education studies] Morpa Yayınları.
  63. Sucuoğlu, B. & Özokçu, O. (2005). Kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin sosyal becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi, [Evaluation of social skills of inclusive students] Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 6(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000086.
  64. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 52, 83–110. https://doi: 10.1891/194589501787383444
  65. Sünbül, A. M. & Sargın, N. (2002). Okul Öncesi Dönemde Kaynaştırma Eğitimine İlişkin Öğretmen Tutumları: Konya İli Örneği, [Attitudes of Teachers to Inclusive Education in Pre-School Period: The Case of Konya Province] Educational Sciences Congress, 23-26 October 2002. Near East University, Lefkoşa, TRNC.
  66. Şahbaz, Ü. (2007). Normal öğrencilerin kaynaştırma sınıflarına devam eden engelli öğrenciler hakkında bilgilendirilmelerinin engellilerin sosyal kabul düzeylerine etkisi.[The effect of informing typical students about disabled students attending inclusive classes on social acceptance levels of disabled students] Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (26), 199-208.
  67. Şahin, S. & Çiçek, Ç. (2008). Examination of normal and exceptional children’s perceptions of each other and themselves, Journal of Society, 19(1), 101-118.
  68. Şahin, F., & Güldenoğlu, B. (2013). Engelliler konusunda verilen eğitim programının engellilere yönelik tutumlar üzerindeki etkisi. [The effect of the educational program given on individuals with disabilities on attitudes toward people with disabilities.] Journal of Amasya University Faculty of Education, 2(1), 214-239.
  69. Townsend, M. A. R., Wilton, K. M., & Vakilirad, T. (1993). Children's attitudes toward peers with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37(4), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00883.x
  70. Turhan, C. (2007). The opinions of students with normal development in primary schools toward inclusion Master Thesis. Anadolu University Institute of Educational Sciences.
  71. Uysal, A. (2004). Kaynaştırma uygulaması yapan öğretmenlerin kaynaştırmaya ilişkin görüşleri. XIII. Ulusal Özel Eğitim Kongresi, Eskişehir.
  72. Ünal, V. (2013). The problem of divorce during the transition from extended family to nuclear family and religion. Journal of International Social Research, 6(26).
  73. Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
  74. Watson S. M. R., & Keith K. D. (2002) Comparing the quality of life of school-age children with and without disabilities. Mental Retardation 40, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040 2.0.CO;2
  75. Fırat, T., & Koyuncu, İ. (2019). Lise Öğrencilerinin Özel Gereksinimli Bireylere Yönelik Sosyal Kabul Düzeyleri. [Social Acceptance Levels of High School Pupils Toward Individuals with Special Needs] Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 39(1), 503-525. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.431264