Journals / International Journal of Modern Education Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

On the effectiveness and limitations of captioning in L2 listening

Pages
516–536
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the insights gained, it is concluded that the mere presence of captions does not necessarily lead to improved comprehension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Listening is often perceived to be the most challenging skill by second/foreign language (L2) learners.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to its real-time nature, L2 listeners experience several comprehension problems related to the processing of aural input.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the insights gained, it is concluded that the mere presence of captions does not necessarily lead to improved comprehension.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Captioning · L2 listening · comprehension

Abstract

Listening is often perceived to be the most challenging skill by second/foreign language (L2) learners. Due to its real-time nature, L2 listeners experience several comprehension problems related to the processing of aural input. To scaffold L2 listening, captioning is commonly used since the dual coding of aural and written stimuli is expected to make L2 input more comprehensible leading to more in-depth processing. However, a survey of the extant literature precludes us from drawing firm conclusions about the effectiveness of captioning since in some circumstances captions were found to have no significant effect on listening comprehension. So, the question of whether captions function as a comprehension aid in L2 listening remains inconclusive. Hence, adopting a narrative literature review methodology, the present study aims to contribute to this inconsistent research area by clarifying some of these issues answering the following questions: (1) Is captioning really effective in L2 listening?, (2) Does captioning always work for L2 listening?, and (3) Why is research on captioning in L2 listening still inconclusive? Based on the insights gained, it is concluded that the mere presence of captions does not necessarily lead to improved comprehension. Captioning effectiveness is influenced by learner, material, measurement, task, and L1/L2 characteristics. Implications arising are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Korucu-KIŞ, S. (2022). On the effectiveness and limitations of captioning in L2 listening. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 516–536. https://ajindex.com/articles/541428

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aldera, A. S., & Mohsen, M. A. (2013). Annotations in captioned animation: Effects on vocabulary learning and listening skills. Computers & Education, 68, 60–75. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.018
  2. Bairstow, D., & Lavaur, J. (2012). Audiovisual information processing by monolinguals and bilinguals: Effects of intralingual and interlingual subtitles. Approaches to Translation Studies, 36, 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207812_016
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
  4. Behroozizad, S., & Majidi, S. (2015). The effect of different modes of English captioning on EFL learners’ general listening comprehension: Full text vs. keyword captions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 115–121. https://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/article/view/1626
  5. Bianchi, F. & T. Ciabattoni (2008). Captions and subtitles in EFL learning: An investigative study in a comprehensive computer environment. In A. Baldry, M. Pavesi & C. Taylor Torsello (eds.), From didactas to ecolingua (pp. 69-80). Edizioni Universit`a di Trieste. Bird, S. A. & Williams, J. N. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics 23(4), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402004022
  6. Brett, P. (1995). Multimedia for listening comprehension: The design of a multimedia-based resource for developing listening skills. System, 23(1), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)00054-A
  7. Caimi, A. (2006). Audiovisual translation and language learning: The promotion of intralingual subtitles. The Journal of Specialised Translation 6, 85–98. https://www.jostrans.org/issue06/art_caimi.php
  8. Chai, J., Erlam, R., 2008. The effect and the influence of the use of video and captions on second language learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 25-44. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.997746379301329
  9. Danan, M. (2004). Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta 49(1), 67–77. http://www.erudit.org/revue/meta/2004/v49/n1/009021ar.html
  10. De Jong, N. (2005) Can second language grammar be learned through listening? An experimental study. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 205–34 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050114
  11. Diao, Y., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2007). The effect of written te