SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Modern Education Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

An Investigation of Preservice Teachers’ Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation

Süleyman ARSLANTAŞ
Pages
146–167
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that the academic motivations of the participants revealed significant differences according to gender, year of study, academic achievement, and career expectation variables

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the academic self-efficacy and motivation levels of preservice teachers and to investigate these cognitive aspects in terms of various variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of the current study consist of 621 preservice teachers studying at Necmettin Erbakan University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education in the 2020-2021 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that the academic motivations of the participants revealed significant differences according to gender, year of study, academic achievement, and career expectation variables
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Preservice teachers · academic self-efficacy · academic motivation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the academic self-efficacy and motivation levels of preservice teachers and to investigate these cognitive aspects in terms of various variables. The participants of the current study consist of 621 preservice teachers studying at Necmettin Erbakan University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education in the 2020-2021 academic year. The study adopted a single survey model. Research data were collected using Academic Self-Efficacy Scale and Academic Motivation Scale. Independent sample T-test and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The findings of the study revealed that the academic self-efficacy and academic motivation levels of the preservice teachers were high; academic self-efficacy did not reveal any significant difference according to gender and year of study variables. It was found out that the academic motivations of the participants revealed significant differences according to gender, year of study, academic achievement, and career expectation variables

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLANTAŞ, S. (2022). An Investigation of Preservice Teachers’ Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 146–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/541425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ait Maalem Lahcen, R., & Mohapatra, R. (2020). Promoting Proactive Behavior through Motivation: Required Math Lab Hours Case. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(1), 110-119.
  2. Allen, J., Robbins, S., Casillas, A.& Oh, In-Sue. (2008). Third-year College Retention and Transfer: Effects of Academic Performance, Motivation, and Social Connectedness. Research in Higher Education. 49. 647-664. 10.1007/s11162-008-9098-3.
  3. Asigigan, S. I. & Samur, Y. (2021). The Effect of Gamified STEM Practices on Students’ Intrinsic Motivation, Critical Thinking Disposition Levels, and Perception of Problem-Solving Skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(2), 332-352.
  4. Bailey, J.G. (1999). Academics’ motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 343–359.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Worth Publisher.
  6. Bandura, A. (2000).Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 9, 75–78.
  7. Bassi, M., Steca, P., Delle Fave, A., Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. J. Youth Adolesc. 36, 301–312.
  8. Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 656–672.
  9. Chemers M. M., Hu L., Garcia B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. J. Educ. Psychol. 93, 55–64.
  10. Chen, Su-Yen & Lu, Luo. (2015). The Role of Achievement Motivations and Achievement Goals in Taiwanese College Students’ Cognitive and Psychological Outcomes. Journal of College Student Development. 56. 397-412. 10.1353/csd.2015.0040. Cook, D.A.& Artino, A.R. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Med Education, 50(10), 997–1014.
  11. Doğru, O. (2020). An investigation of pre-service visual arts teachers’ perceptions of computer self-efficacy and attitudes towards web-based instruction. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(4), 629-637. Doménech F. (2013). An instructional model for guiding reflection and research in the classroom: the educational situation quality model. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 11, 239–260. Doménech-Betoret F., Gómez-Artiga A., Lloret-Segura S. (2014). Personal variables, motivation and avoidance learning strategies in