Journals / International Journal of Modern Education Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Mediating Role of the Locus of Control in the Impact of Organizational Trust on Organizational Cynicism

Pages
133–158
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it was determined that there is a negative relationship between organizational trust and organizational cynicism, and locus of control has a mediator role in the relationship between organizational trust and organizational cynicism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the mediating role of the locus of control in the effect of organizational trust on organizational cynicism in school organizations with latent variables, including all personnel who directly impact education and training in schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of the study were obtained from 385 participants who were selected by simple random sampling method among school personnel working in public schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it was determined that there is a negative relationship between organizational trust and organizational cynicism, and locus of control has a mediator role in the relationship between organizational trust and organizational cynicism.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to examine the mediating role of the locus of control in the effect of organizational trust on organizational cynicism in school organizations with latent variables, including all personnel who directly impact education and training in schools. In this study, the relational scanning model, which is one of the quantitative research methods, was used. The research started with a detailed literature review, and the information on the definitions and theories of the concepts of organizational cynicism, organizational trust, and locus of control were achieved; and a research model was created by developing hypotheses in line with this information. The data of the study were obtained from 385 participants who were selected by simple random sampling method among school personnel working in public schools. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analyses of the obtained data were performed using SPSS and AMOS statistical package programs. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that there is a negative relationship between organizational trust and organizational cynicism, and locus of control has a mediator role in the relationship between organizational trust and organizational cynicism.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHADIR, M., LEVENT, A. F. (2022). The Mediating Role of the Locus of Control in the Impact of Organizational Trust on Organizational Cynicism. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 133–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/541411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Cases and consequences. Generic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269-297.
  2. Akin, U. (2015). The relationship between organizational cynicism and trust in schools: A research on teachers. Education and Science, 40(181), 175-189.
  3. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
  4. Andersson, L. M. & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 449-469.
  5. Arsenault, A., Dolan, S. L. & Van Ameringen, M. R. (1991). Stress and mental strain in hospital work: Exploring the relationship beyond personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(6), 483-493. doi: 10.1002/job.4030120603 Arslantaş, C. & Dursun, M. (2008). The impact of ethical leadership behavior on trust in manager and psychologıcal empowerment: The mediating role of interactional justice. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 111-128.
  6. Bandalos, D. L. & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 93-114).
  7. New York, NY: Routledge. Bartlett, K. R. (2001). The relationship between training and organizational commitment: A study in the health care field. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 335-352. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1001 Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  8. Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S. (1982). Consultation: A handbook for individual and organization development. Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A. & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: longitudinal effects of transformational leader behaviors on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 733-753. doi: 10.1002/job.342 Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Daly, J., Tyler, T. & Martin, C. (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 558– 583. Brandes, P. M. (1997). “Organizational cynicism: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences”. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The University of Cincinnati, Ohio. Brandes, P., Castro, S., James, M