Journals / International Journal of Kurdish Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Unimaginative Symbols of Salim Barakat

Pages
294–308
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As usual, his extraordinarily skilled and extensive use ofdevices of repetition reflect his Kurdish heritage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kurdish poet Salim Barakat (b. 1951, Qamishli, Syria) in 1986published a philosophical poem entitled Haza‟in Manhuba (Glimpsesof Spoliation), the whole of which I have translated from the originalArabic and included as annotated appendix.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Barakat writes modernsecular poetry in a genre I describe as modern Islamic literature, a genre that findsits roots in the Turkic poetry of Shah Isma‟il I who founded the Safavid dynastyin Persia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As usual, his extraordinarily skilled and extensive use ofdevices of repetition reflect his Kurdish heritage.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Kurdish poet Salim Barakat (b. 1951, Qamishli, Syria) in 1986published a philosophical poem entitled Haza‟in Manhuba (Glimpsesof Spoliation), the whole of which I have translated from the originalArabic and included as annotated appendix. Barakat writes modernsecular poetry in a genre I describe as modern Islamic literature, a genre that findsits roots in the Turkic poetry of Shah Isma‟il I who founded the Safavid dynastyin Persia. Barakat‟s theoretical model for his philosophical poem within theaforementioned genre, and his use of meaning-making techniques of repetition isto be found in the arena of ancient Greek literature. It is, however, essentially hisconcept of history that affords him space to include these meaning-making poetictechniques as he strives to present to his readership an exact description of therevolts, uprisings and insurgencies that have been ongoing since the Abbasidcaliphate. He explains the why and how of the wrongdoing, and the consequenceson the Day of Judgment, the divine sphere of action functioning as part of hishistorical narrative. His symbols, in this particular poem, lean less on the Persianand Arabic Sufi poets. He rather creates symbols of his own, symbols that providean aura of the scientific, and are as “unimaginative” as possible – being symbolsof the most basic kind. As usual, his extraordinarily skilled and extensive use ofdevices of repetition reflect his Kurdish heritage.

🔖

Cite This Article

BUTT, A. (2022). The Unimaginative Symbols of Salim Barakat. International Journal of Kurdish Studies, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 294–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/541342

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Barakat, Salim ((2007), al-A‟mal al-Shi„riyah Salim Barakat (The Poetry Works of Salim Barakat). Beirut: al-Mu‟ssah lil-Dirasat wa-Nashr (The Foundation for Studies and Publishing). [Arabic] Khan, M.M. and Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali, M., revised edition (2011), Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur‟an. Houston Texas: Dar-us-Salam Publications. [Online] Available at: http://www.noblequran.com(Accessed 29 Jan 2018). [Arabic and English] English: Abbas, Agha Shabbir (30 Apr 2015). A Glimpse into the Relationship of Shi‟ism and Sufism; With a Special Emphasis on the Works of Mawlana Rumi. [Online] Available at: https://ahlulbaytblog.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/haydar-e-karrar.png (Accessed 2 Jan 2018). Mary Boyce (1979, 2001), Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Butt, A. (2018).
  2. Empire, Split Ethnicities, and an Explosion of Poetry. Turkey: International Journal of Kurdish Studies4 (1), 44 – 69, DOI: 10.21600/ijoks.383376[Online] www.ijoks.com (Accessed 26 Jan 2018).
  3. Daryaee, Touraj, edited by (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Iranian History. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.
  4. Galian, Lawrence (2004). The Centrality of the Divine Feminism in Sufism:Divine Feminine as Khatun-i-Qiyamat (Lady of Resurrection). In: Proceedings of the “2nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Arts and Humanities,” Honolulu Hawaii. [Online] Available at:http://www.adishakti.org/_/centrality_of_the_divine_feminine_in_sufism.htm [Accessed 10 Jan 2018].
  5. Hintze, Almut (2000).Fraso.Kereti. In: Encyclopedia Iranica, vol. X, fasc.2, pp. 190-192. [Online] Available at: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/frasokrti (updated 31 Jan 2012).
  6. Kappagoda, Astika Kautilya (July 2004). Semiosis as the Sixth Sense: Theorising the Unperceived in Ancient Greek (doctoral dissertation, 647 pp.). Sydney Australia: Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University. [Online] Available at: http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/Theses [Accessed 20 Jan 2018].
  7. Minorsky, Vladimir and Shah Isma‟il I (1942). The Poetry of Shah Isma‟il I. In: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press on behalf of School of Oriental and African Studies. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. (1970), Shi„ism and Sufism: Their Relationship in Essence and in History. In: Religious Studies, 6(3), pp. 229-242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/20004827.
  8. Stuurman, Siep (2017). The Invention o