Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Teacher candidates' perception level of environmental pollutant and their risk factors

Pages
185–195
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This may reflect into pupils’ attitudes during teaching process in primary and secondary schools.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is generally accepted that the environmental education deals with a wide range of environmental experiences, methods and processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study has been conducted during in the fall of 2007 with a heterogeneous group of 248 teacher candidates from Education Faculty in Turkey, 82 students chosen from randomly from biology, science and 84 students from classroom teacher departments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This may reflect into pupils’ attitudes during teaching process in primary and secondary schools.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the environmental education deals with a wide range of environmental experiences, methods and processes. Teaching the subject of the environment should not be considered as an easy task. It should not only cover pure ecology education; but also include the citizenship responsibilities and the problems that are sourced from other interdisciplinary factors. Therefore teachers should have the responsibility to facilitate environmental issues. Hitherto no researcher has undertaken a comprehensive study that focuses on environmental education in teacher training programs. This study aims to detect basic environmental knowledge of Turkish teacher candidate at the onset of their studies. This study has been conducted during in the fall of 2007 with a heterogeneous group of 248 teacher candidates from Education Faculty in Turkey, 82 students chosen from randomly from biology, science and 84 students from classroom teacher departments. To detect respondents’ basic knowledge about environmental pollutants we administrated the questionnaire during the 1st month of their last academic year. The results found in this research have shown that teacher candidates possess less pro environmental knowledge. An interpretation of these results is that the teacher candidates do not fully comprehend the underlying ecological and environmental concepts related to environmental issues. Therefore, the design of pre service programs should take into account the characteristic of the student population which are the outcome of their social, cultural, and physical environments, and include all the necessary components for adequately preparing future educators to effectively address the environmental education of their future students. This may reflect into pupils’ attitudes during teaching process in primary and secondary schools.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTAŞ, F., KALIPÇI, E. (2022). Teacher candidates' perception level of environmental pollutant and their risk factors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 185–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/540888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aini, M.S., Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Laly, H.P, & Jariah, M. (2003). Environmental concerns, knowledge and practise gap among Malasian teachers, Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4, 305-313.
  2. Beyhun, N.E. Vaizoglu, S.A., Mete, A., Okur, S., Ongun, M., Orçan, S., & Güler, Ç. (2007). Hacettepe üniveritesi tip fakültesi 2005-2006 ögretim dönemi son sinif ögrencilerinde çevresel risk algilama düzeyi, TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 6, 345-350.
  3. Blum, A. (1985) What do Israeli high school students know and believe about environmental issues? The Journal of Environmental Education, 3, 338-348.
  4. Cutter, A. & Smith, R. (2001). Gauging primary school teachers’ environmental literacy: A issue of priority. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2, 45-60.
  5. Dunlap, R., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
  6. Erten, S. (2002). İlkögretimin II. Kademesindeki (6. 7. ve 8. Sınıflar) Ögrencilerde Çevreye Yararlı Davranısların Arastırılması, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi. 16-18
  7. Eylül, ODTÜ, Ankara.
  8. Erten, S. (2005). Okul öncesi ögretmen adaylarinda çevre dostu davranislarin arastirilmasi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 91-100.
  9. Eulefeld, G. Boolscho, D., Rode, H., Rost, J & Seybold, H (1993). Entwicklung der Praxs schulischer Umwelterziehung in Deutscland (Kiel, IPN). Goldman, D., Schwartz, E., Peled, O., Dunetz, D., Chen, S., Gavrieli, Y., et al., (2003). Policy towards environmental education in Israil; The place of environmental education and toward a new vision, Position paper, National Counsil for Environmental Quality, Committee for Education. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A.N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
  10. Hirsch, G. (1995). Beziehungen zwischen Umweltforschung und disziplinarer Forshung, GAIA, 4(5-6), 302-314.
  11. Hungerford, H. R & Volk, T. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education, The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8, 8-21.
  12. Kyburz-Graber, R. & Robottom, I. (2006). The OECD-ENSI project and its relevance for teacher training concepts in environmental education, In: R. Kyburz-Graber, P. Hart, P. Posch and I. Robottom (Eds), Reflective practice in teacher education: learning from case studies of environmental education, (pp. 309-333). Peter Lan