SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Çevresel Eğilimler Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Environmental Problems, Individual and Social Values; A Strange Dilemma

Fulya Öztaş(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)
Haydar Öztaş(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
67–75
Publication Date
2024-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, it is possible to say that educators should take responsibility for the environmental behavior of individuals and societies, and that environmentally sensitive consumer characteristics, political values and all environmental behaviors should be the main element of any education to be given.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rapid population growth, the need for economic development, insatiable human needs and the increasing diversification of these needs are seen as the main sources of emerging environmental problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is known that social values make significant contributions to the understanding and solution of individual and social environmental problems, and that consumer behavior and environmental policies aimed at protecting the environment largely arise from individual behaviors, and that the attitudes and behaviors of individuals and societies towards the environment are closely related to their traditional values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, it is possible to say that educators should take responsibility for the environmental behavior of individuals and societies, and that environmentally sensitive consumer characteristics, political values and all environmental behaviors should be the main element of any education to be given.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Environmental pronlems · individuals & sociaties · ecological balance

Abstract

Rapid population growth, the need for economic development, insatiable human needs and the increasing diversification of these needs are seen as the main sources of emerging environmental problems. It is known that social values make significant contributions to the understanding and solution of individual and social environmental problems, and that consumer behavior and environmental policies aimed at protecting the environment largely arise from individual behaviors, and that the attitudes and behaviors of individuals and societies towards the environment are closely related to their traditional values. This study aims to create an environmental policy based on renewable energies that is reliable, meaningful in terms of environmental values, economically sustainable, ensuring the development and continuation of humanity and other living things, effective and capable of using as much energy as needed, for a sustainable environmental policy that can continue in future generations. and supports the view that its sustainability is essential. It is possible to argue that the essence of all environmental problems lies in the unwillingness of individuals and societies to accept a more modest lifestyle. For this reason, it is possible to say that educators should take responsibility for the environmental behavior of individuals and societies, and that environmentally sensitive consumer characteristics, political values and all environmental behaviors should be the main element of any education to be given.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztaş, F., Öztaş, H. (2024). Environmental Problems, Individual and Social Values; A Strange Dilemma. Uluslararası Çevresel Eğilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 67–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/1565897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Stern, P.C. (2002) New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2000, pp. 407–424.
  2. Deng, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Mancl, K. Biogas as a sustainable energy source in China: Regional development strategy application and decision making. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 35, 294–303.
  3. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
  4. Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effects on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111–133.
  5. Dunlap, R. E. and Kent D. Van Liere. 1978. The New Environmental Paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9, 10-19.
  6. Arons, H., Francek, M., Nelson, B., and Bisard, W. (1994) Atmospheric misconceptions, The Science Teacher, 61(1), 30-33.
  7. Boyes E., Chambers M., Stanisstreet M. (1995) Trainee primary teachers’ ideas about the 74(5): 555–569.
  8. Schultz, P. W. (2002a). Environmental attitudes and behaviors across cultures. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, & D. N. Sattler (Eds.), OnLine Readings in Psychology and Culture, Western Washington University, Department of Psychology, Center for Cross-Cultural Research Web site: (http://www.wwu.edu/~culture).
  9. Schultz, P. W. (2002b). Knowledge, education, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), Education, information, and voluntary measures in environmental protection (pp. 67-82). National Academy of Sciences.
  10. Dietz, T., A. Dan and R. Shwom (2007) Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology 72:185–214.
  11. Solomon, J. (1985) Learning and Evaluation: A Study of School Children's Views on the Social Uses of Energy, Social Studies of Science, 15 (2) 343-371.
  12. ICC, 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Callander, B.A., Harris, N., Kattenberg A., Maskell, K. (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  13. IPCC (2001), Climate Change, The Scientific Basis, Cambridge Univ. Press, 881 pp.
  14. Kalof, L, Dietz,T, Stern, P. C., and Guagnano, G.A (1999). Race, Gender and Environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Fairfax, VA 22030.
  15. Dunlap, R.E., C. Xiao and A.M. McCright (2001) Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environmental Politics 10(4):23–48.
  16. Jacques, P.J., Dunlap, E.R., Freeman, M (2008), The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks andenvironmental scepticism, Environmental Politics, 17(3):349-385.
  17. Stern, P.C (2000) Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions, Am Psychol., 55(5):523-30.
  18. Kyriakopoulos, G.; Kolovos, K.; Chalikias, M. Woodfuels Prosperity towards a More Sustainable Energy Production. In Track I: Social & Humanistic Computing for the Knowledge Society: Emerging Technologies and Systems for the Society and the Humanity, Proceedings of the 3rd World Summit on the Knowledge Society (WSKS 2010), Corfu, Greece, 22–24 September 2010; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 19–25.
  19. Kolovos, K.; Kyriakopoulos, G.; Chalikias, M. Co-evaluation of basic woodfuel types used as alternative heating sources to existing energy network. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2011, 12, 733–742.