Journals / International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik) / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

A Review of Research on Environmental Education in Non-traditional Settings in Turkey, 2000 and 2011

Pages
37–57
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The techniques and instructions used as the intervention in these selected studies were observed to contribute to development of participants' gains associated with knowledge of the environment and nature, perception of nature, environmental affect, responsible environment behaviors and conception and understanding of science.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study was to collect and analyze the research on environmental education in non-traditional settings in Turkey undertaken with various subjects (e.g. students, graduates and teachers) and published over the years of 2000-2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The close examination resulted in 11 studies reporting the effects of the interventions (e.g. hands-on practices, field trip activities) and 4 studies reporting participants' views on the effects of the interventions in general.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The techniques and instructions used as the intervention in these selected studies were observed to contribute to development of participants' gains associated with knowledge of the environment and nature, perception of nature, environmental affect, responsible environment behaviors and conception and understanding of science.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to collect and analyze the research on environmental education in non-traditional settings in Turkey undertaken with various subjects (e.g. students, graduates and teachers) and published over the years of 2000-2011. For systematic analysis, selected data-bases and journals were scrutinized across five pre-determined criteria. The close examination resulted in 11 studies reporting the effects of the interventions (e.g. hands-on practices, field trip activities) and 4 studies reporting participants' views on the effects of the interventions in general. Field trips, ecology-based nature education programs, nature camps and science education instruction in non-traditional settings were used as educational intervention in the selected studies. Later, these studies were subjected to content analysis to present the trends and to synthesize the common findings of the selected studies. The techniques and instructions used as the intervention in these selected studies were observed to contribute to development of participants' gains associated with knowledge of the environment and nature, perception of nature, environmental affect, responsible environment behaviors and conception and understanding of science.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAR, M., UŞAK, M., ERDOĞAN, M. (2022). A Review of Research on Environmental Education in Non-traditional Settings in Turkey, 2000 and 2011. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education (elektronik), Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 37–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/540779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bogner, F.X. (1998). The influence of short term outdoor ecology education on long term variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29 (4), 17- 29. Disinger, J. F. (1983). Environmental education's definitional problem. (ERIC Information Bulletin #2). Columbus, OH:ERIC, SMEAC. Dresner, M., & Gill, M. (1994). Environmental education at summer nature camp. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25 (3), 35-41
  2. Elo, S. & Kyng?s, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107-115.
  3. Erdoğan, M., Marcinkowski, T., & Ok, A. (2009). Content analysis of selected features of K - 8 environmental education research studies in Turkey, 1997-2007. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 525-548.
  4. Erdoğan, M., & Uşak, M. (2009). Curricular and extra-curricular activities for developing environmental awareness of young students: A case from Turkey, Odgojne Znanosti- Educational Sciences, 11(1), 73-85
  5. Erentay, N. & Erdoğan, M. (2009). 22 adımda doğa eğitimi. Odtü Yayıncılık: Ankara Ford, P. (1986). Outdoor education: Definition and philosophy. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools Digest, Las Cruces, NM. Frankel, J., & Wallen, N., (2000) How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Gough, A. (1997) Education and the Environment: policy, trends and the problems of marginalisation, Australian Education Review no. 39 (Melbourne, Australian Council for Educational Research). Hines, J., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A. (1986/87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
  6. Jickling, B. & Spork, (1998). Education for the Environment: a critique. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 309-327
  7. Kızılaslan, A., Sözbilir, M., & Yaşar, M.D. (2013). Inquiry-based teaching in Turkey: A content analysis of research report. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 599-617.
  8. Lewis, G.E. (1981-82). A revie classroom methodologies for environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 13(2), 12-15.
  9. Lucas, A.M. (1980-81). The role of science educaton in education for the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 12(2), 33-37
  10. Marcinkowski, T. J. (2010). Contemporary challenges and opportunities in environmental education: Whwre are we headed and what deserves our attention? Journal of Environmental Education, 41 (1), 3