Journals / International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

An Experimental Investigation on The Effects of Waste Olive Oil Biodiesel on Combustion, Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions

Pages
103–116
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Soot emissions decreased by 37.5% compared to diesel.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the biodiesel obtained from the waste olive oil bytransesterification method has been mixed with a 30% of diesel fuel asvolume and tested with a single cylinder direct injection diesel engine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Themain purpose of this study is to obtain purer biodiesel from waste olive oilusing methyl alcohol (CH3OH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as catalyst inthe transesterification method and research performance, combustion andemission characteristics in detail in a direct injection diesel engine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Soot emissions decreased by 37.5% compared to diesel.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the biodiesel obtained from the waste olive oil bytransesterification method has been mixed with a 30% of diesel fuel asvolume and tested with a single cylinder direct injection diesel engine. Themain purpose of this study is to obtain purer biodiesel from waste olive oilusing methyl alcohol (CH3OH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as catalyst inthe transesterification method and research performance, combustion andemission characteristics in detail in a direct injection diesel engine. Thecombustion, engine performance and exhaust emission values have been alsocompared with diesel fuel. The test engine was operated at a constant speedof 2200 rpm and different engine loads such as 3.25 Nm, 7.5 Nm, 11.25 Nm,18.75 Nm. According to the experimental results, the thermal efficiency ofbiodiesel is lower by about 1% to 5% than diesel. CO is lower about 37.5 %with biodiesel than that of diesel at 18.75 Nm. CO2 is higher 41% withbiodiesel than diesel at 11.25 Nm. NOx was measured 9.5% higher than dieselfuel at 18.75 Nm. Soot emissions decreased by 37.5% compared to diesel.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, E., SOLMAZ, H., CALAM, A., AKSOY, F., AKAY, F., BAYDIR, Ş. A., UYUMAZ, A., AYDOĞAN, B. (2022). An Experimental Investigation on The Effects of Waste Olive Oil Biodiesel on Combustion, Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 103–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/540315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Hasan M.M., Rahman, M.M., ‘’Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel–diesel blend and environmental and economic impacts of biodiesel production: A review’’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 938–948, (2017)
  2. Abbaszaadeh, A. et al., ‘’Current biodiesel production technologies: A comparative review’’, Energy Conversion and Management, 63, 138–148, (2012)
  3. Karmakar, A., Karmakar, S., Mukherjee, S., ‘’Properties of various plants and animals feedstocks for biodiesel production’’, Bioresource Technology, 101(19), 7201–7210, (2010)
  4. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, A., Amin, N.A.S., Mazaheri, H., ‘’A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil’’, Applied Energy, 104, 683–710, (2013)
  5. Haşimoğlu, C., İçingür, Y., Özsert, İ., ‘’Turbo şarjlı bir dizel motorda yakıt olarak biyodizel kullanılmasının motor performans ve egzoz emisyonlarına etkisi,’’ Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Dergisi, 23(1), 207–213, (2008)
  6. Sinha, S., Agarwal, A.K., Garg, S., “Biodiesel development from rice bran oil: Transesterification process optimization and fuel characterization’’, Energy Conversion and Management, 49(5), 1248–1257, (2008)
  7. Zhang, Y., Dubé, M.A., McLean, D.D., Kates, M., ‘’Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment’’, Bioresource Technology, 89(1), 1–16, (2003)
  8. Pilar Dorado, M., Ballesteros, E., Mittelbach, M., Lopez, F.J., ‘’Kinematic Parameters Affecting the Alkali-Catalyzed Transesterfication Process of Used Oliver oil’’, Energy Fuels, 18(5), 1457-1467, (2004)
  9. Abed, K.A., El Morsi, A.K., Sayed, M.M., El Shaib, A.A., Gad, M.S., ‘’Effect of waste cooking-oil Biodiesel on Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a Diesel Engine’’, Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 28, 985-989, (2018)
  10. Gao, Y., Chen, Y., Gu, J., Xin, Z., Sun, S., ‘’Butyl-biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil: Kinetics, Fuel Properties and Emission Performance’’, Fuel, 236, 1489-1495, (2019)
  11. Shen, X., Shi, J., Cao, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Wu, H., ‘’Real-World Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Consumption for Diesel Vehicles Fueled by Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel Blends’’, Atmospheric Environment, 191, 249-257, (2018)
  12. Yesilyurt, M.K., ‘’The Effects of the Fuel Injection Pressure on The Performance and Emissions Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Fuelled with Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel-Diesel Blends’’, Renewable Energy, 132, 649-666, (2019)
  13. Akar, M.A., Kekilli, E., Bas, O., Yıldızhan, S