Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 151 - Sayı: 151

VERTICAL AND HORIZANTAL ANALYSIS OF CRUSTAL STRUCTURE IN EASTERN ANATOLIA REGION

Pages
217–229
Publication Date
2015-12-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of derivative methods, the structure transitions were increased rather especially with Bitlis Zagros Suture Zone.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The tectonic regime of Eastern Anatolia is determined by Arabian-Eurasian continentcontinent convergence and the mechanism occurred with the convergence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results of derivative methods, the structure transitions were increased rather especially with Bitlis Zagros Suture Zone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, the geodynamical structure of the region is examined with the previous studies done in the region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eastern Anatolia · gravity · derivative methods

Abstract

The tectonic regime of Eastern Anatolia is determined by Arabian-Eurasian continentcontinent convergence and the mechanism occurred with the convergence. North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ), Eastern Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), North Eastern Anatolian Faults and Bitlis Zagros Suture Zone are formed by this convergence, represent the characteristic of lithospheric structure of the region. In the scope of this study, the gravity anomalies of Eastern Anatolia were used for investigating the lithospheric structure. Firstly, second order trend analyses were applied to gravity data for examining the characteristic of the anomaly. Later, the vertical and horizontal derivatives methods were applied to the same data. Generally, the purpose of the applying derivative methods is determining the vertical and horizontal borders of the structure. Therefore, this method gives the opinion about the characteristic of the lithospheric structure of the study region. According to the results of derivative methods, the structure transitions were increased rather especially with Bitlis Zagros Suture Zone. At the last step, the gravity studies were evaluated together with the seismic activity of the region. Consequently, the geodynamical structure of the region is examined with the previous studies done in the region.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAMUKÇU, O., GÖNENÇ, T., ÇIRMIK, A. Y., DEMİRBAŞ, Ş., TOSUN, S. (2015). VERTICAL AND HORIZANTAL ANALYSIS OF CRUSTAL STRUCTURE IN EASTERN ANATOLIA REGION. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 151 - Sayı: 151, 217–229. https://ajindex.com/articles/54024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al-Lazki, A., Seber, D., Sandvol, E., Türkelli, N., Mohamad R., Barazangi, M. 2003. Tomographic Pn ve- locity and anisotropy structure beneath the Anato- lian plateau (eastern Turkey) and the surrounding regions. Geophysical Research Letters 30, 24, 8043, doi: 10.1029/2003GL017391. Barka, A.A., Toksöz, M.N., Gülen, L., Kadinsky-Cade K. 1987. Segmentation, seismicity and earthquake po- tential of the eastern section of the North Anatoli- an Fault Zone. Yerbilimleri, Bulletin of the Earth Sciences Application and Research Centre of Ha- cettepe University 14, 337-352.
  2. Barka, A.A., Reilinger, R. 1997. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region: deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data. Annali di Geofisica XI. 587-610.
  3. Bird, P., Toksöz, M.N., Sleep, N.H. 1975. Thermal and mechanical models of continent-continent conver- gence zones, Journal of Geophysical Research, 80, 4405-4416.
  4. Blakely R. J., Simpson R. W. 1986. Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysic, 51, 7, 1494-1498.
  5. Bozkurt, E. 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14, 3-30.
  6. Butler, D., K. 1984. Microgravimetric and gravity gradient techniques for subsurface cavities. Geophysic, 49,1084-1096.
  7. Coney, P.J., Jones, D.L., Monger, J.W. 1980. Cordilleran suspect terranes. Nature 288, 329-3.
  8. Demets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F., Stein, S. 1994. Ef- fects of recent revisions to the geomagnetic rever- sal time scale on estimates of current plate moti- ons. Geophysical Research Letters 21, 2191-2194.
  9. Dewey, J.F. 1976. Seismicity of northern Anatolia. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 66, 843- 68. Dewey, J.F. 1977. Suture zone complexities: a review. Tec- tonophysics 40, 53-67.
  10. Dewey, J.F., Hempton, M.R., Kidd, W.S.F., Şaroğlu F., Şengör A.M.C. 1986. Shortening of continental lithospere: the neotectonics of eastern Anatolia- a young collision zone. Geological Society Special Publications 19, 3-36
  11. Gök, R., Sandvol, E., Türkelli, N. Seber, D., Barazangi, M. 2003. Sn attenuation in the Anatolian and Iranian plateau and surrounding regions. Geophysical Research Letters 30, 24, 8042, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018020. Gönenç, T. 2014. Investigation of distribution of embedded shallow structures using the first order vertical de- rivative of gravity data. Journal of Applied Geoph ysics, 104, 44-57.
  12. Gürsoy, H., Temiz, H., Poisson, A.M. 1992. Recent faul- ting in the Sivas area (Sivas Basin), Central Anato- lia- Turkey. Cumhuriyet University