Journals / International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND BENCHMARKING OF THE PHYSICAL AND ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF 316L CUBIC LATTICE STRUCTURES FABRICATED BY SELECTIVE LASER MELTING

Pages
13–22
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the same volume fraction, SC lattices represent the highest relative elastic modulus while FCC lattices indicate the lowest.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate and benchmark the physical and elastic properties of strut-based lattice structures produced by selective laser melting from 316L stainless steel material, which has many uses in various sectors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the presented study, the relative density and relative elastic modulus for 27 types of strut-based lattice structures of different sizes with simple cubic (SC), body-centered cubic (BCC) and face-centered cubic (FCC) geometry were evaluated and compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the same volume fraction, SC lattices represent the highest relative elastic modulus while FCC lattices indicate the lowest.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Additive Manufacturing · Selective Laser Melting · Strut-based Lattice Structures

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate and benchmark the physical and elastic properties of strut-based lattice structures produced by selective laser melting from 316L stainless steel material, which has many uses in various sectors. Within the scope of the presented study, the relative density and relative elastic modulus for 27 types of strut-based lattice structures of different sizes with simple cubic (SC), body-centered cubic (BCC) and face-centered cubic (FCC) geometry were evaluated and compared. Numerical analyzes were utilized due to the evaluated design and dimensional configuration diversity, and consistent results were obtained with the studies published in the previous literature. The findings of the study showed that for all lattice structure types, volume fraction increases with the increasing diameter and decreases with the increasing cell size. With the utilization of same strut diameter and cell size FCC type lattice structures exhibit the highest volumetric fill while SC type lattice structures exhibit the lowest. The increase in the volume fraction increases the relative elastic modulus. For the same volume fraction, SC lattices represent the highest relative elastic modulus while FCC lattices indicate the lowest.

🔖

Cite This Article

Poyraz, Ö., Bilici, B. E., Gedik, Ş. C. (2022). NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND BENCHMARKING OF THE PHYSICAL AND ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF 316L CUBIC LATTICE STRUCTURES FABRICATED BY SELECTIVE LASER MELTING. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 13–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/539747

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Poyraz, Ö. and Kuşhan, M.C., “Investigation of the effect of different process parameters for laser additive manufacturing of metals”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 729-742, 2018
  2. Kuşhan, M. C., Poyraz, Ö., Uzunonat, Y. and Orak, S., “Systematical Review On The Numerical Simulations Of Laser Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing”, Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume 36, Issue 4, Page 1197-1214, 2018
  3. Poyraz, Ö., Bilici, B.E. and Gedik, Ş.C., “Hücresel Kafes Yapılarının Eklemeli İmalatı: Tasarım Karakteristikleri, Üretim Ve Performansı”, Selçuk 4. Uygulamalı Bilimler Kongresi, Karaman, Sayfa 14-23, 2021
  4. Hanks, B., Berthel, J., Frecker, M. and Simpson, T. W., “Mechanical properties of additively manufactured metal lattice structures: data review and design interface”, Additive Manufacturing, Volume 35, 101301, 2020
  5. Vafadar, A., Guzzomi, F., Rassau, A. and Hayward, K., “Advances in metal additive manufacturing: a review of common processes, industrial applications, and current challenges”, Applied Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 3, 1213, 2021
  6. Gürkan, D., and Sağbaş, B. “Additively Manufactured Ti6al4v Lattice Structures For Biomedical Applications”, International Journal Of 3d Printing Technologies And Digital Industry, Volume 5, Issue 2, Page 155-163, 2021
  7. Kayacan, M. C., Baykal, Y. B., Karaaslan, T., Özsoy, K., Alaca, İ., Duman, B., and Delikanlı, Y. E., “Monitoring the osseointegration process in porous Ti6Al4V implants produced by additive manufacturing: an experimental study in sheep”, Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, Volume 16, Issue 2, Page 68-75, 2018 8. Bajaj, P., Hariharan, A., Kini, A., Kürnsteiner, P., Raabe, D. and Jägle, E. A., “Steels in additive manufacturing: A review of their microstructure and properties”, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 772, 138633, 2020
  8. Alsalla, H., Hao, L. and Smith, C., “Fracture toughness and tensile strength of 316L stainless steel cellular lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique”, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 669, Page 1-6, 2016
  9. Ashouri, D., Voshage, M., Burkamp, K., Kunz, J., Bezold, A., Schleifenbaum, J. H. and Broeckmann, C., “Mechanical behaviour of additive manufactured 316L f2ccz lattice structure under static and cyclic loading”, International Journal of Fatigue, Volume 134